security-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Deep OWASP security audit with exploit scenarios and CWE references. Use when user says 'security audit', 'OWASP check', 'guvenlik denetimi', 'penetration test', 'deep security scan', 'OWASP analiz'.
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- argos-ci/argostheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- classroomio/classroomiotheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dio-az/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roke22/Squadratheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- qwwiwi/agentos-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- craigcossairt/trellistheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +7 more from lilangMax
- +1 more from nicepkg
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 192
- ruvnet/claude-flow★ 80ksame name
- ruvnet/ruflo★ 79ksame name
- PostHog/posthog★ 40ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- cloudflare/security-audit-skill★ 18ksame name
- rommapp/romm★ 14ksame name
- kubeshark/kubeshark★ 12ksame name
- maximhq/bifrost★ 9.4ksame name
- mono/SkiaSharp★ 5.6ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
182 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 173 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Use Glob and Read to determine the project type:
- Distinctive: line 30
If multiple types are detected, audit all applicable frameworks.
- Distinctive: line 105
After the report, suggest:
- Distinctive: line 112
Always check for false positives by reading full context around grep matches.
- Distinctive: line 113
If a finding matches multiple OWASP items, list it under the most relevant one and cross-reference.
- Distinctive: line 114
Do not report findings for test files unless they indicate a pattern used in production.
- Distinctive: line 115
Consider the project's framework when evaluating findings (e.g., React auto-escapes JSX, Django auto-escapes templates).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 173 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Nazar Security Audit Skill
You are performing a deep OWASP-based security audit. Follow these instructions systematically.
Step 1: Detect Project Type
Use Glob and Read to determine the project type:
Web Application Indicators:
package.jsonwith express/next/nuxt/react/angular/vue/django/flask/rails- Files:
*.html,*.ejs,*.jsx,*.tsx,*.vue,*.svelte - Directories:
pages/,views/,templates/,public/
Mobile Application Indicators:
android/directory,AndroidManifest.xml,build.gradleios/directory,Info.plist,Podfileapp.jsonwith expo config,react-native.config.jspubspec.yaml(Flutter),capacitor.config.ts
API Indicators:
package.jsonwith express/fastify/koa/nest (without frontend)requirements.txtwith flask/fastapi/django-rest-framework- Files:
routes/,controllers/,resolvers/,schema.graphql - OpenAPI/Swagger spec files
If multiple types are detected, audit all applicable frameworks.
Step 2: Load the Relevant OWASP Framework
Based on the detected project type, read the corresponding framework file:
- Web: Read
skills/security-audit/frameworks/owasp-web.md - Mobile: Read
skills/security-audit/frameworks/owasp-mobile.md - API: Read
skills/security-audit/frameworks/owasp-api.md
Step 3: Systematic Audit
For each of the 10 items in the loaded framework:
- Run all grep patterns from the framework item against the project codebase using the Grep tool.
- For each match, use Read to examine the surrounding code (at least 20 lines of context).
- Apply context analysis instructions from the framework to determine if the match is a real finding or false positive.
- Classify findings by severity:
- CRITICAL: Exploitable with high impact (data breach, RCE, privilege escalation)
- HIGH: Exploitable with moderate impact or requires some conditions
- MEDIUM: Vulnerability exists but exploitation is limited
- LOW: Best practice violation, defense-in-depth improvement
- INFO: Informational finding, no direct vulnerability
Step 4: Generate Report
Present findings in this format:
## OWASP Security Audit Report
**Project Type:** [Web/Mobile/API]
**Framework:** OWASP [Top 10 2021 / Mobile Top 10 2024 / API Security Top 10 2023]
**Scan Date:** [current date]
### Executive Summary
- Total Findings: X
- Critical: X | High: X | Medium: X | Low: X | Info: X
---
### [A01/M01/API1] - [Item Name]
**Status:** [PASS / FINDINGS DETECTED]
#### Finding 1: [Short description]
- **Severity:** CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO
- **CWE:** CWE-XXX
- **File:** `path/to/file.ts:42`
- **Evidence:** [relevant code snippet]
- **Exploit Scenario:** [how an attacker could exploit this]
- **Remediation:** [specific fix with code example]
- **Priority:** P1/P2/P3/P4
[Repeat for each finding under this item]
---
[Repeat for each of the 10 OWASP items]
### Remediation Priority Matrix
| Priority | Finding | File | Effort |
|----------|---------|------|--------|
| P1 | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |
| P2 | ... | ... | Low/Med/High |
### Recommendations
1. [Top priority recommendation]
2. [Second priority recommendation]
...Step 5: Offer Next Steps
After the report, suggest:
- "Use
/nazar:fixto auto-fix applicable findings" - "Use
/nazar:complianceto check regulatory compliance" - "Run
npm audit/pip-auditfor dependency vulnerability details"
Important Notes
- Always check for false positives by reading full context around grep matches.
- If a finding matches multiple OWASP items, list it under the most relevant one and cross-reference.
- Do not report findings for test files unless they indicate a pattern used in production.
- Consider the project's framework when evaluating findings (e.g., React auto-escapes JSX, Django auto-escapes templates).
- Be specific in remediation: provide code examples tailored to the project's stack.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

