compliance
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Check regulatory compliance (GDPR, SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA). Use when user says 'compliance check', 'GDPR kontrol', 'KVKK', 'SOC 2', 'PCI-DSS', 'HIPAA', 'uyumluluk kontrol', 'regulatory check'.
14 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kortix-ai/CompanyOStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- anthropics/claude-for-financial-advisorstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- kortix-ai/sunatheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nitinjain999/platform-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- edu6565/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions14 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 14
- kortix-ai/suna★ 21ksame name
- kortix-ai/CompanyOS★ 21ksame name
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills★ 455same name
- anthropics/claude-for-financial-advisors★ 131same name
- nitinjain999/platform-skills★ 71same name
- autosendhq/email-skills★ 18same name
- insight68/Skills★ 5same name
- Lukasbrujula/claude-code-framework★ 4same name
- Percival-Labs/engram★ 3same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
4 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
If the user explicitly mentions GDPR, KVKK, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, or HIPAA, use that framework.
- Distinctive: line 15
If the user says "compliance check" without specifying, detect the relevant framework:
- Distinctive: line 45
If multiple frameworks are relevant, ask the user which to prioritize or offer to run all applicable frameworks.
- Distinctive: line 49
Read the corresponding framework file:
- Very specific: line 51
GDPR/KVKK: Read skills/compliance/frameworks/gdpr.md
- Distinctive: line 64
COMPLIANT: All criteria met
- Distinctive: line 67
NOT APPLICABLE: Check does not apply to this project
- Distinctive: line 134
After the report, suggest:
- Distinctive: line 143
Consider the project's deployment environment (cloud provider, region) for compliance context.
- Distinctive: line 146
Do not report compliance for items you cannot verify from code alone.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Nazar Compliance Check Skill
You are performing a regulatory compliance audit at the code level. Follow these instructions systematically.
Step 1: Determine Compliance Framework
Option A: User specifies a framework If the user explicitly mentions GDPR, KVKK, SOC 2, PCI-DSS, or HIPAA, use that framework.
Option B: Auto-detect from project context If the user says "compliance check" without specifying, detect the relevant framework:
- GDPR/KVKK indicators:
- European user base (
.eu,.de,.fr,.trdomains) - Cookie consent implementation
- Privacy policy references
- Data export/deletion features
- Turkish language content (KVKK)
- EU/TR payment processors
- European user base (
- SOC 2 indicators:
- SaaS application
- Multi-tenant architecture
- Enterprise customer features
- Audit logging
- SSO/RBAC implementation
- PCI-DSS indicators:
- Payment processing (Stripe, Braintree, PayPal)
- Credit card data handling
- E-commerce functionality
- Card number fields/patterns
- HIPAA indicators:
- Health/medical data fields
- Patient records
- HL7/FHIR references
- Healthcare terminology
- PHI/ePHI references
If multiple frameworks are relevant, ask the user which to prioritize or offer to run all applicable frameworks.
Step 2: Load the Framework Reference
Read the corresponding framework file:
- GDPR/KVKK: Read
skills/compliance/frameworks/gdpr.md - SOC 2: Read
skills/compliance/frameworks/soc2.md - PCI-DSS: Read
skills/compliance/frameworks/pci-dss.md - HIPAA: Read
skills/compliance/frameworks/hipaa.md
Step 3: Systematic Compliance Check
For each check item in the loaded framework:
- Run all grep patterns from the framework item against the project codebase using the Grep tool.
- For each match, use Read to examine context (at least 15 lines).
- Apply pass/fail criteria from the framework to determine compliance status.
- Classify each item:
- COMPLIANT: All criteria met
- PARTIAL: Some criteria met, gaps identified
- NON-COMPLIANT: Criteria not met, significant gaps
- NOT APPLICABLE: Check does not apply to this project
Step 4: Generate Compliance Report
Present findings in this format:
## Compliance Audit Report
**Framework:** [GDPR/KVKK | SOC 2 Type II | PCI-DSS v4.0 | HIPAA]
**Project:** [project name]
**Audit Date:** [current date]
### Compliance Summary
| # | Check Item | Status | Risk Level |
|---|-----------|--------|------------|
| 1 | [item name] | COMPLIANT/PARTIAL/NON-COMPLIANT/N/A | HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW |
| 2 | ... | ... | ... |
**Overall Score:** X/Y checks compliant (Z%)
---
### Detailed Findings
#### 1. [Check Item Name]
**Status:** COMPLIANT / PARTIAL / NON-COMPLIANT / NOT APPLICABLE
**Evidence Found:**
- [What was found in the codebase, with file:line references]
**Gaps Identified:**
- [What is missing or insufficient]
**Risk Assessment:**
- Likelihood: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
- Impact: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
- Risk Level: [CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
**Remediation:**
- [Specific steps to close the gap]
- [Code example if applicable]
**Priority:** P1/P2/P3/P4
---
[Repeat for each check item]
### Compliance Gap Analysis
| Gap | Risk | Remediation | Effort | Priority |
|-----|------|-------------|--------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | Low/Med/High | P1-P4 |
### Recommendations
1. **Immediate (P1):** [Critical gaps that must be addressed now]
2. **Short-term (P2):** [High-risk gaps for next sprint]
3. **Medium-term (P3):** [Medium-risk improvements]
4. **Long-term (P4):** [Best practice enhancements]Step 5: Offer Next Steps
After the report, suggest:
- "Use
/nazar:security-auditfor a deeper OWASP security analysis" - "Use
/nazar:fixto auto-fix applicable compliance gaps" - Specific third-party tools for advanced compliance testing
Important Notes
- Compliance is not just a code-level concern. Note when organizational/process controls are needed beyond code.
- Be specific about what constitutes compliance vs. non-compliance for each check.
- Consider the project's deployment environment (cloud provider, region) for compliance context.
- For GDPR/KVKK: consider both the technical implementation and the legal requirements.
- For HIPAA: clearly distinguish between Required and Addressable specifications.
- Do not report compliance for items you cannot verify from code alone; note them as "Requires organizational verification".
- Provide actionable, specific remediation steps with code examples where possible.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

