vet
Skill5 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants a security and trust-boundary review of the current design before implementation or release.
9 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- LeonardiFranco/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dtiger1889-ops/claude-harness-toolboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- atilladeniz/Kubelitheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- catcatcatstudio/cat-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 27, 2026
- tokyubevoxelverse/vettheir own version, first seen Jul 22, 2026
- evist0/okf-matt-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use teach.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillteach
Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- JustineDevs/premortem★ 286% same
Wrote their own version · 8
- imbue-ai/vet★ 518same name
- atilladeniz/Kubeli★ 387same name
- dtiger1889-ops/claude-harness-toolbox★ 31same name
- Sanexxxx777/curated-claude-code★ 16same name
- evist0/okf-matt-skills★ 13same name
- catcatcatstudio/cat-skills★ 3same name
- LeonardiFranco/skills★ 1same name
- tokyubevoxelverse/vet★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use this skill inside Codex to review security posture before the build lane.
- Very specific: line 26
Use references/security-playbooks.md when you need the native security playbook set for common trust-boundary reviews.
- Distinctive: line 27
Keep security guidance product-owned and lane-aware.
- Distinctive: line 28
Call out missing assumptions that affect security posture.
- Distinctive: line 35
Test abuse cases such as confused deputy behavior, injection, replay, overbroad access, and failure disclosure.
- Distinctive: line 44
Use the SLSA source for build and release supply-chain findings.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Vet
Use this skill inside Codex to review security posture before the build lane. $vet remains the sole security gate even as Meta-Architect ships deeper native security playbooks.
Output
Produce:
decision,status,evidence,blockers,next_allowed_triggers- trust boundaries
- authn/authz expectations
- sensitive data paths
- abuse cases and likely failure modes
- concrete mitigations
- accepted risks
- release blockers vs acceptable risks
- exact next trigger, usually
$vibe
Rules
- Prioritize material risks over exhaustive but low-value checklists.
- Use
references/security-playbooks.mdwhen you need the native security playbook set for common trust-boundary reviews. - Keep security guidance product-owned and lane-aware. Do not introduce a second umbrella or a separate security release gate.
- Call out missing assumptions that affect security posture.
- Distinguish between must-fix blockers and documented accepted risk.
Procedure
- Enumerate assets, actors, trust boundaries, permissions, and external dependencies.
- Trace sensitive inputs from entry to storage, logs, tools, and outbound responses.
- Test abuse cases such as confused deputy behavior, injection, replay, overbroad access, and failure disclosure.
- Propose least-privilege mitigations with owner, verification, and residual risk.
- Route approved remediation to
$vibeand keep security gate ownership explicit.
Default evidence dossier
Use docs/reference/security-verification.md
as the default OWASP ASVS cross-check for web, API, plugin, and hosted MCP
surfaces. Map each material finding to a control and verification artifact.
Use the SLSA source for build and release supply-chain findings. Neither source
replaces the product threat model, and no standard claim is valid without
version-pinned evidence.
Quality bar
- Findings are tied to a concrete attack path and impact.
- “Read-only” claims are verified against actual tools, routes, and deployment behavior.
- Accepted risks include rationale, scope, and a future review trigger.
Example
For a hosted plugin, verify domain ownership, endpoint authentication, tool annotations, skill provenance, secret handling, and whether any route can cause an unapproved side effect.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

