agentleFS
JustineDevsJustineDevs/meta-architect/skills/flow/SKILL.md

flow

Skill5 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user wants logic validation: states, transitions, invariants, edge cases, dead ends, and blockers before implementation.

33 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use grill, implement and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • renatorozasSkill

    grill

    Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Hugging FaceSkill

    implement

    Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    status

    Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    ship

    Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 26 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill inside Codex to pressure-test how the system behaves, not just how it is structured.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer simple state models over sprawling branching logic.

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    Every transition has a precondition, action, resulting state, and failure outcome.

    line 46

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 26 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Flow

Use this skill inside Codex to pressure-test how the system behaves, not just how it is structured.

Output

Produce:

  • decision, status, evidence, blockers, next_allowed_triggers
  • key actors and system states
  • state map and failure flows
  • main flows and failure flows
  • invariants and state transitions
  • race conditions, dead ends, and consistency risks
  • missing requirements or ambiguous behavior
  • exact next trigger, usually $vet

Rules

  • Focus on behavior, not UI polish or low-level code details.
  • Surface ambiguity aggressively when it affects correctness.
  • Prefer simple state models over sprawling branching logic.

Procedure

  1. List actors, inputs, persistent state, external boundaries, and terminal outcomes.
  2. Draw the happy path and at least one failure, retry, cancellation, and partial-completion path.
  3. State invariants that must remain true across transitions and retries.
  4. Identify races, stale reads, duplicate actions, and irreversible edges.
  5. Return the smallest state-model correction and route implementation to $vet.

Default evidence dossier

Use docs/reference/reliability-and-recovery.md when the task includes retries, recovery, partial completion, concurrency, or operational failure. Apply its review fields to the concrete state model and cite the pinned source in the receipt. The dossier is guidance, not proof that the implementation is reliable; tests and runtime evidence remain required.

Quality bar

  • Every transition has a precondition, action, resulting state, and failure outcome.
  • Retries are idempotent or explicitly bounded.
  • The model distinguishes user intent, system observation, and external side effects.

Example

For a deployment flow, model draft, build, verification, publish, failure, and rollback states instead of treating a successful CLI request as proof that production is ready.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.