agentleFS
JunfengRanJunfengRan/dev-env/skills/vue-best-practices/SKILL.md

vue-best-practices

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

MUST be used for Vue.js tasks. Strongly recommends Composition API with `<script setup>` and TypeScript as the standard approach. Covers Vue 3, SSR, Volar, vue-tsc. Load for any Vue, .vue files, Vue Router, Pinia, or Vite with Vue work. ALWAYS use Composition API unless the project explicitly requires Options API.

30 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 0 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Surging: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 1 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use nitro, using-superpowers and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SentrySkill

    nitro

    Build and deploy universal JavaScript servers with Nitro v3. Use when working with nitro.config.ts, defineNitroConfig, defineHandler, defineConfig, server.ts entry, filesystem routing, route rules, useStorage, defineCachedHandler, useDatabase, definePlugin, runtime hooks, Vercel/Cloudflare deployment, or migrating from Nitro v2/nitropack.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    using-superpowers

    Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    finishing-a-development-branch

    Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • CloudflareSkill

    receiving-code-review

    Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from openai

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

32 rules. 12 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.

  • 12

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 13

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Use this skill as an instruction set.

    line 12
  2. Common:

    Avoid unnecessary re-renders: use computed properties and watchers wisely.

    line 18
  3. Common:

    Readability counts: write clear, self-documenting code.

    line 19
  4. Very specific:

    Default stack: Vue 3 + Composition API + <script setup lang="ts">.

    line 23
  5. Very specific:

    If the project explicitly uses Options API, load vue-options-api-best-practices skill if available.

    line 24
  6. Very specific:

    If the project explicitly uses JSX, load vue-jsx-best-practices skill if available.

    line 25
  7. Common:

    Before implementing any Vue task, make sure to read and apply these core references:

    line 29
  8. Common:

    Keep these references in active working context for the entire task, not only when a specific issue appears.

    line 34
  9. Distinctive:

    Create a brief component map before implementation for any non-trivial feature.

    line 38
  10. Distinctive:

    Keep entry/root and route-level view components as composition surfaces by default.

    line 41
  11. Very specific:

    Prefer a feature folder layout (components/<feature>/..., composables/use<Feature>.ts) when adding more than one component.

    line 44
  12. Very specific:

    Must-read reference from 1.1: reactivity

    line 52
  13. Very specific:

    Keep source state minimal (ref/reactive), derive everything possible with computed.

    line 53
  14. Common:

    Use watchers for side effects if needed.

    line 54
  15. Common:

    Avoid recomputing expensive logic in templates.

    line 55
  16. Very specific:

    Must-read reference from 1.1: sfc

    line 59
  17. Very specific:

    Keep SFC sections in this order: <script> → <template> → <style>.

    line 60
  18. Distinctive:

    Keep SFC responsibilities focused.

    line 61
  19. Common:

    Keep templates declarative.

    line 62
  20. Distinctive:

    Prefer smaller components + composables over one “mega component”

    line 69
  21. Distinctive:

    Keep entry/root and route view components thin: app shell/layout, provider wiring, and feature composition.

    line 81
  22. Very specific:

    Do not place full feature implementations in entry/root/view components when those features contain independent parts.

    line 82
  23. Very specific:

    Must-read reference from 1.1: component-data-flow

    line 92
  24. Common:

    Use props down, events up as the primary model.

    line 93
  25. Very specific:

    Use v-model only for true two-way component contracts.

    line 94
  26. Distinctive:

    Use provide/inject only for deep-tree dependencies or shared context.

    line 95
  27. Very specific:

    Keep contracts explicit and typed with defineProps, defineEmits, and InjectionKey as needed.

    line 96
  28. Very specific:

    Must-read reference from 1.1: composables

    line 100
  29. Distinctive:

    Keep composable APIs small, typed, and predictable.

    line 102
  30. Common:

    Do not add these by default.

    line 109
  31. Common:

    Use these only when there is explicit product or technical need.

    line 124
  32. Common:

    All must-read references were read and applied.

    line 144

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Vue Best Practices Workflow

Use this skill as an instruction set. Follow the workflow in order unless the user explicitly asks for a different order.

Core Principles

  • Keep state predictable: one source of truth, derive everything else.
  • Make data flow explicit: Props down, Events up for most cases.
  • Favor small, focused components: easier to test, reuse, and maintain.
  • Avoid unnecessary re-renders: use computed properties and watchers wisely.
  • Readability counts: write clear, self-documenting code.

1) Confirm architecture before coding (required)

  • Default stack: Vue 3 + Composition API + <script setup lang="ts">.
  • If the project explicitly uses Options API, load vue-options-api-best-practices skill if available.
  • If the project explicitly uses JSX, load vue-jsx-best-practices skill if available.

1.1 Must-read core references (required)

  • Before implementing any Vue task, make sure to read and apply these core references:
    • references/reactivity.md
    • references/sfc.md
    • references/component-data-flow.md
    • references/composables.md
  • Keep these references in active working context for the entire task, not only when a specific issue appears.

1.2 Plan component boundaries before coding (required)

Create a brief component map before implementation for any non-trivial feature.

  • Define each component's single responsibility in one sentence.
  • Keep entry/root and route-level view components as composition surfaces by default.
  • Move feature UI and feature logic out of entry/root/view components unless the task is intentionally a tiny single-file demo.
  • Define props/emits contracts for each child component in the map.
  • Prefer a feature folder layout (components/<feature>/..., composables/use<Feature>.ts) when adding more than one component.

2) Apply essential Vue foundations (required)

These are essential, must-know foundations. Apply all of them in every Vue task using the core references already loaded in section 1.1.

Reactivity

  • Must-read reference from 1.1: reactivity
  • Keep source state minimal (ref/reactive), derive everything possible with computed.
  • Use watchers for side effects if needed.
  • Avoid recomputing expensive logic in templates.

SFC structure and template safety

  • Must-read reference from 1.1: sfc
  • Keep SFC sections in this order: <script> → <template> → <style>.
  • Keep SFC responsibilities focused; split large components.
  • Keep templates declarative; move branching/derivation to script.
  • Apply Vue template safety rules (v-html, list rendering, conditional rendering choices).

Keep components focused

Split a component when it has more than one clear responsibility (e.g. data orchestration + UI, or multiple independent UI sections).

  • Prefer smaller components + composables over one “mega component”
  • Move UI sections into child components (props in, events out).
  • Move state/side effects into composables (useXxx()).

Apply objective split triggers. Split the component if any condition is true:

  • It owns both orchestration/state and substantial presentational markup for multiple sections.
  • It has 3+ distinct UI sections (for example: form, filters, list, footer/status).
  • A template block is repeated or could become reusable (item rows, cards, list entries).

Entry/root and route view rule:

  • Keep entry/root and route view components thin: app shell/layout, provider wiring, and feature composition.
  • Do not place full feature implementations in entry/root/view components when those features contain independent parts.
  • For CRUD/list features (todo, table, catalog, inbox), split at least into:
    • feature container component
    • input/form component
    • list (and/or item) component
    • footer/actions or filter/status component
  • Allow a single-file implementation only for very small throwaway demos; if chosen, explicitly justify why splitting is unnecessary.

Component data flow

  • Must-read reference from 1.1: component-data-flow
  • Use props down, events up as the primary model.
  • Use v-model only for true two-way component contracts.
  • Use provide/inject only for deep-tree dependencies or shared context.
  • Keep contracts explicit and typed with defineProps, defineEmits, and InjectionKey as needed.

Composables

  • Must-read reference from 1.1: composables
  • Extract logic into composables when it is reused, stateful, or side-effect heavy.
  • Keep composable APIs small, typed, and predictable.
  • Separate feature logic from presentational components.

3) Consider optional features only when requirements call for them

3.1 Standard optional features

Do not add these by default. Load the matching reference only when the requirement exists.

  • Slots: parent needs to control child content/layout -> component-slots
  • Fallthrough attributes: wrapper/base components must forward attrs/events safely -> component-fallthrough-attrs
  • Built-in component <KeepAlive> for stateful view caching -> component-keep-alive
  • Built-in component <Teleport> for overlays/portals -> component-teleport
  • Built-in component <Suspense> for async subtree fallback boundaries -> component-suspense
  • Animation-related features: pick the simplest approach that matches the required motion behavior.
    • Built-in component <Transition> for enter/leave effects -> transition
    • Built-in component <TransitionGroup> for animated list mutations -> transition-group
    • Class-based animation for non-enter/leave effects -> animation-class-based-technique
    • State-driven animation for user-input-driven animation -> animation-state-driven-technique

3.2 Less-common optional features

Use these only when there is explicit product or technical need.

  • Directives: behavior is DOM-specific and not a good composable/component fit -> directives
  • Async components: heavy/rarely-used UI should be lazy loaded -> component-async
  • Render functions only when templates cannot express the requirement -> render-functions
  • Plugins when behavior must be installed app-wide -> plugins
  • State management patterns: app-wide shared state crosses feature boundaries -> state-management

4) Run performance optimization after behavior is correct

Performance work is a post-functionality pass. Do not optimize before core behavior is implemented and verified.

  • Large list rendering bottlenecks -> perf-virtualize-large-lists
  • Static subtrees re-rendering unnecessarily -> perf-v-once-v-memo-directives
  • Over-abstraction in hot list paths -> perf-avoid-component-abstraction-in-lists
  • Expensive updates triggered too often -> updated-hook-performance

5) Final self-check before finishing

  • Core behavior works and matches requirements.
  • All must-read references were read and applied.
  • Reactivity model is minimal and predictable.
  • SFC structure and template rules are followed.
  • Components are focused and well-factored, splitting when needed.
  • Entry/root and route view components remain composition surfaces unless there is an explicit small-demo exception.
  • Component split decisions are explicit and defensible (responsibility boundaries are clear).
  • Data flow contracts are explicit and typed.
  • Composables are used where reuse/complexity justifies them.
  • Moved state/side effects into composables if applicable
  • Optional features are used only when requirements demand them.
  • Performance changes were applied only after functionality was complete.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.