agentleFS
JunfengRanJunfengRan/dev-env/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md

deep-research

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

按 spec/research-workflow.yaml 编排多角度深度研究:状态机、ContextPack、subagent barrier、gate 放行。 触发:深入分析、技术选型、竞品对比、源码验证、决策文档、deep research。

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-paper-reviewer

    Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-pipeline

    Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • stophobiaSkill

    surprise-me

    Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +4 more from nicepkg
  • +1 more from W-Moorer

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read Spec + 当前 state.json 的 currentState(也可用 node scripts/research-cli.mjs status)

    line 30

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Deep Research(薄编排层)

阶段定义不在本 SKILL — 唯一真相源是 spec/research-workflow.yaml。

启发式补充(非 Spec 阶段)

研究问题或选型边界仍模糊时,可先用 brainstorm 做几轮澄清与方案对比,再把结论写进 research-brief.json。

  • brainstorm 不是 Spec state,不经 gate / reducer
  • 用户已明确读者、scope、evidenceTargets 时可跳过
  • 交接模板见 brainstorm/references/handoff-templates.md

启动 / 恢复 Run

  1. 用 CLI 新建 run(推荐)或恢复已有目录(见 spec/run-directory.md):
node scripts/research-cli.mjs init <run-id> --slug <slug>
# 或: npm run research -- init <run-id> --slug <slug>
  1. 确认 run-meta.json、state.json、context-pack.json、observations.jsonl、replay-chain.json 已生成
  2. Read Spec + 当前 state.json 的 currentState(也可用 node scripts/research-cli.mjs status)

每轮循环

读 Spec 当前 state → 按 contextSlice 组装 ContextPack 注入
→ 执行(agent / skill / parallel_subagents)
→ 写 artifacts → research-cli advance(gate + reducer + bump)
→ 写 observation(subagent 用 after-subagent-complete)

状态类型

kind行为
agent主 deep-research agent 执行
parallel_subagentsdispatch codebase-verifier;barrier 同步
skill调用 interpret-tech-notes 或 write-idea-docs
terminal结束

禁止

  • 未跑 gate / 未 advance 就宣称 phase 完成
  • 跳过 Spec 未定义的 transition
  • 子 agent 结论只写 chat 不写 observations.jsonl
  • 手改 state.json barrier(应走 reducer / CLI / after-subagent-complete)

References

  • read-spec-guide.md
  • context-pack-guide.md
  • subagent-dispatch-guide.md
  • replay-guide.md
  • plan-critique-playbook.md
  • depth-checklist-decision.md

工具命令

node scripts/research-cli.mjs init <run-id> --slug <slug>
node scripts/research-cli.mjs status [run-dir]
node scripts/research-cli.mjs advance [run-dir]
node scripts/research-cli.mjs verify [run-dir]
node scripts/research-cli.mjs apply <run-dir> '<event-json>'
node scripts/gates/<gate>.mjs .research/<run-id>
node plugins/deep-research-gates/scripts/after-subagent-complete.mjs .research/<run-id> <subagentId> <artifact>
node plugins/deep-research-gates/scripts/bump-context-pack.mjs .research/<run-id> <phase>
npm run validate:research-spec

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.