agentleFS
JuankCadavidJuankCadavid/akili-specs/.claude/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

brainstorming

Skill10 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation. In AKILI-SPECS projects, follow the AKILI-SPECS Integration section first.

190 other projects use a version of this, 104 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    addskill

    Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    apply-firmware

    Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +6 more from ryanportfolio

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 14

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When this skill is loaded inside the AKILI-SPECS methodology, this section overrides the generic flow below:

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea.

    line 36
  3. Distinctive:

    Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a …

    line 39
  4. Distinctive:

    The terminal state is invoking writing-plans: Do NOT invoke frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill.

    line 79
  5. Distinctive:

    Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)

    line 84
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea

    line 85
  7. Distinctive:

    Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too

    line 86
  8. Distinctive:

    Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions

    line 87
  9. Distinctive:

    Ask after each section whether it looks right so far

    line 98
  10. Very specific:

    Write the validated design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md

    line 105
  11. Distinctive:

    Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available

    line 106
  12. Distinctive:

    Commit the design document to git

    line 107
  13. Distinctive:

    Do NOT invoke any other skill.

    line 111
  14. Distinctive:

    One question at a time: - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions

    line 115
  15. Distinctive:

    YAGNI ruthlessly: - Remove unnecessary features from all designs

    line 117
  16. Distinctive:

    Explore alternatives: - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling

    line 118

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AKILI-SPECS Integration

When this skill is loaded inside the AKILI-SPECS methodology, this section overrides the generic flow below:

AKILI momentHow to use this skill
/akili-constitution Step 0Ask the new-vs-existing project question and clarify seed intent
/akili-proposeExplore intent, scope, options, and trade-offs before writing proposal.md
/akili-specify Phases 1–3Clarify problem/actors (requirements), explore trade-offs (design), sequence work (tasks)

Adaptation rules:

  • Artifacts land in AKILI documents — proposal.md, requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md under docs/specs/. Do NOT write docs/plans/*-design.md.
  • The terminal state is the AKILI phase you are in, not the writing-plans skill (it is not packaged here). After approval, continue the active AKILI command's next step.
  • The HARD-GATE still applies: no implementation before the user approves the design.

Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Overview

Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.

Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.

<HARD-GATE> Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity. </HARD-GATE>

Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"

Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.

Checklist

You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:

  1. Explore project context — check files, docs, recent commits
  2. Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
  3. Propose 2-3 approaches — with trade-offs and your recommendation
  4. Present design — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
  5. Write design doc — save to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md and commit
  6. Transition to implementation — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan

Process Flow

digraph brainstorming {
    "Explore project context" [shape=box];
    "Ask clarifying questions" [shape=box];
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" [shape=box];
    "Present design sections" [shape=box];
    "User approves design?" [shape=diamond];
    "Write design doc" [shape=box];
    "Invoke writing-plans skill" [shape=doublecircle];

    "Explore project context" -> "Ask clarifying questions";
    "Ask clarifying questions" -> "Propose 2-3 approaches";
    "Propose 2-3 approaches" -> "Present design sections";
    "Present design sections" -> "User approves design?";
    "User approves design?" -> "Present design sections" [label="no, revise"];
    "User approves design?" -> "Write design doc" [label="yes"];
    "Write design doc" -> "Invoke writing-plans skill";
}

The terminal state is invoking writing-plans. Do NOT invoke frontend-design, mcp-builder, or any other implementation skill. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.

The Process

Understanding the idea:

  • Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
  • Ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
  • Prefer multiple choice questions when possible, but open-ended is fine too
  • Only one question per message - if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
  • Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria

Exploring approaches:

  • Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
  • Present options conversationally with your recommendation and reasoning
  • Lead with your recommended option and explain why

Presenting the design:

  • Once you believe you understand what you're building, present the design
  • Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
  • Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
  • Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
  • Be ready to go back and clarify if something doesn't make sense

After the Design

Documentation:

  • Write the validated design to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md
  • Use elements-of-style:writing-clearly-and-concisely skill if available
  • Commit the design document to git

Implementation:

  • Invoke the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan
  • Do NOT invoke any other skill. writing-plans is the next step.

Key Principles

  • One question at a time - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
  • Multiple choice preferred - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
  • YAGNI ruthlessly - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
  • Explore alternatives - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
  • Incremental validation - Present design, get approval before moving on
  • Be flexible - Go back and clarify when something doesn't make sense

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.