vis
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Draw it instead of describing it — one monospace diagram in the terminal: flow, tree, layers, timeline, table, bar chart, or state machine.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jircdev/crew-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- jircdev/crew-plugin★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- 3wSkill
- catchupSkill
- clear-viewSkill
- decisionSkill
- first-principleSkill
- impactSkill
- one-lineSkill
- scopeSkill
- tldrSkill
- tradeoffSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 36
When two fit, pick the one that answers the question asked: comparison → table, order → flow or timeline, magnitude → bar, nesting → tree, …
- Distinctive: line 48
No emoji, no ANSI colour, no tabs, no mermaid, no ASCII art of pictures, logos, or faces.
- Distinctive: line 49
No file written unless the user explicitly asks for one.
- Distinctive: line 54
Run this over your own drawing.
- Very specific: line 57
Every box's │ walls line up in the same columns on every row of that box.
- Very specific: line 58
Every connecting ▶ ◀ ▲ ▼ butts against the line it leaves and the wall it points at — no space on either side.
- Very specific: line 59
Every branch has a ┬, ┴, or ┼ at the junction.
- Distinctive: line 130
Don't write "Here's a diagram showing the request flow:" above the block — the block is the answer, and the sentence makes it two answers.
- Distinctive: line 133
Don't mix forms. A flow with a comparison table under it is two drawings, and the user asked for one.
- Very specific: line 136
Don't draw a picture with /\ characters — a cat, a rocket, a logo.
- Distinctive: line 139
Don't emit a mermaid block and note that it renders on GitHub.
- Distinctive: line 141
Don't let one label push a line past 80.
- Distinctive: line 144
Don't spend 40 rows. Cut to the 5–7 things that carry the decision.
- Distinctive: line 147
Don't "save it as vis.md for you" or write an SVG.
- Very specific: line 149
If no request was supplied, visualize the current session's situation — the same subject clear-view would describe in prose.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
VIS
Goal: the user looks at one drawing and understands the structure. No sentence needed.
Text only, inside the session. No mermaid, no HTML, no SVG, no images, no file written to disk, no artifact viewer. If the subject can't be drawn in a monospace code block, say so and ask for the one part of it that is drawable.
Pick one form
Exactly one. Not a form with a table bolted on, not a hybrid.
| Form | Use when | Shape |
| flow | Steps, pipeline, cause → effect, data path | [A] ──▶ [B] ──▶ [C] |
| tree | Nesting, ownership, dir/file structure, decision paths | root ├── a └── b |
| layers | Stacked planes — architecture, protocol stack, request depth | ┌───┐ │ x │ └───┘ |
| timeline | Order over time, who talks to whom, sequence | t0 ──▶ t1 ──▶ t2 |
| table | Options × criteria, before/after, side by side | aligned grid |
| bar | Magnitudes from real numbers — counts, latency, share | ████████░░ 8/10 |
| state | States and the transitions between them | (idle) ──start──▶ [running] |
When two fit, pick the one that answers the question asked: comparison → table, order → flow or timeline, magnitude → bar, nesting → tree, behavior over time → state.
Rules
- Respond in the same language the user wrote in. If they write in Chinese, label in Chinese. Technical terms (Redis, JWT, API) stay in English.
- One fenced code block. That is the answer. Optional bold title above it, optional single bold bottom line after it — nothing else. No "here's a diagram of…", no bullets describing what it shows.
- ≤80 display columns, ≤20 rows. Count the widest line in display columns, not characters — a CJK character is 1 character but 2 columns wide, so a Chinese label eats twice the width it looks like. Don't eyeball it; the user can ask for wider or taller.
- Box drawing only:
┌ ┐ └ ┘ ─ │ ├ ┤ ┬ ┴ ┼ ▶ ◀ ▲ ▼, plus█░for bars. In a box or a vertical flow, branch with┬/┴/┼, never two arrows stacked on separate rows; a tree branches with├/└. - Alignment is the whole point. The left and right wall of a box sit in the same two columns on every row of that box. An arrow starts and ends on a wall or a line, never in air. A misaligned box is a broken drawing, not a small cosmetic issue.
- Arrow labels are verbs, conditions, or the mechanism on that edge, ≤3 words (
token ok,on 5xx,HTTPS). Node labels are nouns, ≤20 chars — break a long one onto two lines inside the box rather than widening the box. - Numbers carry their scale:
8/10,p95 120 ms,+34%. A bar with no value is decoration. - No emoji, no ANSI colour, no tabs, no mermaid, no ASCII art of pictures, logos, or faces. This draws structure, not illustrations.
- No file written unless the user explicitly asks for one.
- Nothing in the request? Visualize the current session's subject. Truly nothing? Ask
Visualize what?and stop.
Self-check before sending
Run this over your own drawing. Fix, then send.
- Widest line is ≤80 display columns — CJK counts as 2 — count it, don't guess.
- Every box's
│walls line up in the same columns on every row of that box. - Every connecting
▶ ◀ ▲ ▼butts against the line it leaves and the wall it points at — no space on either side. Shorthand inside a label (queue ▶ reconcile ▶ DLQ) is fine. - Every branch has a
┬,┴, or┼at the junction. - Bar lengths match the numbers, and the block says what one block is worth (
1 █ ≈ 20 ms) — on the title line or beside the bars. - One form, one code block, nothing outside it but the optional title and bottom line.
Output format
A bold title line (a short noun phrase, optional), then exactly one fenced code block holding the drawing, then at most one bold bottom line. Nothing else in the message.
Examples
The outer fence here is just a wrapper. In real output the title and the bottom line sit
outside the drawing's code block, where bold actually renders — put them inside it and
the user sees literal **asterisks**.
/vis request 進到 API 之後發生什麼
**Request 進到 API 之後**
┌──────────┐
│ client │
└────┬─────┘
│ HTTPS
▼
┌──────────┐
│ edge │
└────┬─────┘
│
▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ auth │───▶│ session │
└────┬─────┘ │ (redis) │
│ token ok └──────────┘
▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ handler │───▶│ postgres │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘/vis Redis 還是 Postgres 存 session
**Session 存在哪**
┌────────────┬──────────────┬──────────────┐
│ │ redis │ postgres │
├────────────┼──────────────┼──────────────┤
│ revocation │ instant │ instant │
│ latency │ <1 ms │ ~2 ms │
│ scale out │ horizontal │ vertical 1st │
│ ops burden │ high │ low │
│ durability │ lossy │ durable │
└────────────┴──────────────┴──────────────┘
**Postgres 除非你已經有 redis 在跑**/vis p95 latency 每個 endpoint
**p95 latency by endpoint** (1 block ≈ 20 ms)
/search ████████████████████ 412 ms
/checkout ██████████ 207 ms
/login ███ 61 ms
/health █ 23 msAnti-examples
Don't write "Here's a diagram showing the request flow:" above the block — the block is the answer, and the sentence makes it two answers.
Don't mix forms. A flow with a comparison table under it is two drawings, and the user asked for one.
Don't draw a picture with /\ characters — a cat, a rocket, a logo. This skill draws
structure; illustration is a different skill someone else can write.
Don't emit a mermaid block and note that it renders on GitHub. It doesn't render here.
Don't let one label push a line past 80. It wraps, the wall moves, the box breaks — shorten the label or put it on two lines.
Don't spend 40 rows. Cut to the 5–7 things that carry the decision; the rest is a second drawing nobody asked for.
Don't "save it as vis.md for you" or write an SVG. The terminal is the medium.
If no request was supplied, visualize the current session's situation — the same subject
clear-view would describe in prose.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

