catchup
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Quick status brief so the user can pick up where things left off — what changed, what state it's in, what's next.
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- shortcuts/dotfilestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blamechris/chroxytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LilMGenius/paperthintheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- saksham10arora-dotcom/everything-claude-codextheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Avijit07x/claude-dbtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- poshan0126/dotclaudetheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use wrapup, explain and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Skeln-ioSkillwrapup
End-of-session closeout — commit, push, and optionally post a Slack summary. Use when you say "wrap up", "done for now", "save everything", or similar.
Also in 3 projects that use this
sunnyclinches44Skillexplain
Explains code using real-world analogies and ASCII diagrams
Also in 3 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 4 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillpr-review
Verify the technical accuracy of a vscode-docs pull request against the VS Code source code in microsoft/vscode. Use when reviewing a docs PR for factual correctness: setting names, command IDs, default values, API shapes, keybindings, versioned availability, and described behavior.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 26
- LilMGenius/paperthin★ 1.4ksame name
- poshan0126/dotclaude★ 871same name
- getsentry/sentry-wizard★ 296same name
- Avijit07x/claude-db★ 233same name
- DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra★ 199same name
- wilbeibi/catchup★ 81same name
- saksham10arora-dotcom/everything-claude-codex★ 74same name
- shortcuts/dotfiles★ 18same name
- blamechris/chroxy★ 8same name
- iopsystems/skills-mcp★ 6same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- 3wSkill
- clear-viewSkill
- decisionSkill
- first-principleSkill
- impactSkill
- one-lineSkill
- scopeSkill
- tldrSkill
- tradeoffSkill
- visSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
If there's no git repo or no meaningful history, say so directly rather than padding the response.
- Distinctive: line 58
Don't summarize commits into a theme ("various skill improvements").
- Distinctive: line 61
Don't report "Current state: clean" when there's untracked work sitting there.
- Distinctive: line 64
Don't turn the next step into a roadmap.
- Distinctive: line 67
If a branch, date, or "since <commit>" was supplied, scope the git history to that instead of just recent commits.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Catch Up
Goal: user reads this once and knows exactly what happened, what state things are in, and what to do next — no need to dig through git log themselves.
Rules
- Respond in the same language the user wrote in. If they write in Chinese, reply in Chinese. Technical terms (JWT, Redis, API…) stay in English.
- Max 12 lines. Hard limit.
- Ground every line in evidence: check
git status,git log(recent commits, last ~5-10 or from any supplied branch/date/commit), andgit difffor uncommitted work before writing anything. Never guess at what changed. - "Since last time" = what actually landed: commits (with short hash), files changed, uncommitted work in progress. Cite specifics, not "some fixes were made".
- "Current state" = is it clean, mid-change, broken, blocked? Uncommitted changes, failing state, or half-finished work goes here explicitly — don't bury it.
- "Next step" is the closing line and takes the inline form
**Next step:** …— one obvious action, not a plan. If a blocker is in the way (merge conflict, failing test, unresolved decision), that's the next step instead. - If there's no git repo or no meaningful history, say so directly rather than padding the response.
- No emoji.
Output format
**Since last time**
- `[hash]` [commit subject]
- Uncommitted: [file] ([new / +N lines / deleted])
**Current state**
[clean / mid-change / blocked — one line, concrete]
**Next step:** [the one obvious action, or the blocker in the way]Example
/catchup
**Since last time**
- `6efbe87` Add clear-view and doubt skills, reviewer agent
- `e6fd00f` Bump version to 1.4.0
- Uncommitted: `skills/one-line/SKILL.md` (new, untracked), `README.md` (+12 lines)
**Current state**
Mid-change — new skill written and documented, nothing committed yet; no tests in this repo to run
**Next step:** commit the one-line skill plus the README and version bump as one changeAnti-examples
Don't summarize commits into a theme ("various skill improvements"). The subject lines are already short — quote them.
Don't report "Current state: clean" when there's untracked work sitting there. Untracked counts.
Don't turn the next step into a roadmap. One action. If the user needs the plan, they'll ask for it.
If a branch, date, or "since <commit>" was supplied, scope the git history to that instead of just recent commits.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

