pentest
Skill44 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Security audit a subsystem by writing failing RSpec request specs that demonstrate vulnerabilities.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- victorbeppler/claude-bootstraptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- julianosirtori/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LuisSambrano/antigravity-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- g-cqd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- greglas75/zuvotheir own version, first seen Oct 16, 2026
- harshitsharma0701/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- zakirkun/deep-eye★ 2.3ksame name
- Strategic-Automation/violin★ 159same name
- us/shannon-on-claude-code★ 15same name
- ariadoss/superskills★ 12same name
- LuisSambrano/antigravity-config★ 8same name
- greglas75/zuvo★ 7same name
- gonimar/claude-web-studio★ 4same name
- g-cqd/skills★ 2same name
- Digital-Frontier-LDA/shannon-claude-code★ 1same name
- leonardoaraujosantos/my_ai_skills★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- commit-messagesSkill
- defragSkill
- diff-explainerSkill
- hierarchical-documentationSkill
- method-reviewSkill
- retroSkill
- structural-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Read the relevant source code first.
- Distinctive: line 17
Consider two categories of vector:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pentest
Security-audit a user-specified scope by acting as a malicious insider with full source code access.
Approach
Read the relevant source code first. Plan attacks before writing any tests. Think like an attacker who has read every line of the implementation and is looking for gaps between intent and behavior.
Consider two categories of vector:
Active attacks — crafted requests designed to extract data or perform actions beyond the caller's permissions. Examples: parameter manipulation, filter/sort injection, oracle attacks, IDOR, privilege escalation through endpoint misuse.
Passive vectors — data shapes that accidentally expose information without any malicious request. The system must be correct for every possible data topology, not just the happy path. Examples: graph/hierarchy edge cases, transitive visibility through deep nesting, role combinations that widen access unexpectedly, race conditions in ownership changes.
Constraints
You do not have access to a browser. RSpec request specs are your lab — use them to test every hypothesis. Request specs exercise the full stack (routing, authentication, authorization, scoping, serialization, database).
Deliverables
- Failing spec file — RSpec request specs where each test asserts the correct, secure behavior. A vulnerability causes a test failure. The spec file should be red (or partially red) when vulnerabilities exist, green when the system is secure.
- Report — an HTML report explaining what was verified as secure, confirmed vulnerabilities with root cause and severity, and suggested fix directions. Include additional helpful context and visuals where helpful. Add a disclaimer that these are not exhaustive, we just showed that you were not vulnerable in these particular ways.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

