agentleFS
JihaoXinJihaoXin/paper-machine/skills/page-fitting/SKILL.md

page-fitting

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Fit a paper to a venue page limit without gutting it, or expand a thin draft to fill the space. Use when the paper is over or under the limit, or when preparing a camera-ready. Covers what actually counts against the limit and which compressions are safe.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Resize figures: Only down to the point where labels stay readable, and never below the point in figure-integrity.

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    delete the limitations section

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    remove citations to fit, which changes the scholarship to fit the layout

    line 41
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not pad with restatement.

    line 53
  5. Distinctive:

    Off: Do not adjust. Use when the content is still moving.

    line 63

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Page Fitting

Count the right pages

Most venues limit body pages. References usually do not count, and appendices often do not either. Before compressing anything, find out what the call for papers actually says, then measure the body, not the file.

A 10-page PDF against a 4-page limit may already comply if five of those pages are references. Compressing it would destroy a paper that was fine.

To measure the body, find the page where the bibliography starts and count up to there.

Over the limit

Apply in this order. The early moves cost nothing, the later ones cost content.

  1. Tighten prose. Cut hedging, repetition, and sentences that restate the previous one. This alone often reclaims half a page and improves the paper.
  2. Move detail to the appendix. Hyperparameter tables, extra ablations, proofs, dataset statistics.
  3. Resize figures. Only down to the point where labels stay readable, and never below the point in figure-integrity.
  4. Merge tables. Two small tables with a shared column often become one.
  5. Cut the weakest experiment. Painful, and better than a rejection for length.

Never do these:

  • shrink the font or margins below what the template sets, which most venues check and desk-reject
  • delete the limitations section
  • remove citations to fit, which changes the scholarship to fit the layout

Under the limit

An under-length paper wastes the space you were given, and reviewers read whitespace as thin work. Expand with substance:

  • a related-work paragraph that actually engages with the closest paper
  • a limitations section
  • an ablation you ran but did not report
  • a worked example or a clearer figure

Do not pad with restatement. Do not add an experiment you did not run.

Fitting modes

Pick a mode and hold to it:

  • Strict. Fill the budget closely, for example 3.85 to 4.0 pages of a 4-page limit. Use for camera-ready, where whitespace is wasted space.
  • Balanced. Stay under the limit, do not chase the last line. Use for drafts under review.
  • Off. Do not adjust. Use when the content is still moving.

Strict mode is iterative: compile, measure body pages, adjust, repeat. Cap the iterations. If several passes have not converged, the content is genuinely too large and something has to move to the appendix.

After any adjustment

Recompile the full chain and re-check. Page fitting often runs a bare pdflatex, which can strand ? citations that were resolved before the adjustment. Verify the delivered PDF, not the one from two steps ago.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.