agentleFS
JayuanlabJayuanlab/zhiyu/skills/ai-knowledge-creator/SKILL.md

ai-knowledge-creator

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Research, verify, produce, and review source-backed AI knowledge content for a recurring creator workflow. Use for AI topic discovery, short-video scripting, publishing drafts, and post-publication learning; do not use for unsourced trend summaries or unreviewed public posting.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Search a bounded recent window and record each source's publisher, URL, publication time, observation time, and source type.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer primary evidence: official announcements and documentation, original papers, model cards, release notes, and source repositories.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Write for spoken Chinese: lead with the practical consequence, explain what changed, show who it matters to, and close with a concrete …

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    Create a vertical-video production package with title, description, topics, concise captions, narration, scene plan, source list, and …

    line 17
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep upload and public publishing behind owner review.

    line 20
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not present a repost, rumor, benchmark screenshot, or unattributed social post as confirmed fact.

    line 24
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not copy long passages or reuse third-party video, music, images, logos, or voices without confirmed permission.

    line 25
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not expose API keys, private messages, personal data, unpublished project information, or paid content.

    line 26
  9. Distinctive:

    If no candidate clears the evidence and novelty threshold, report that outcome and skip production.

    line 27
  10. Distinctive:

    Treat earlier runtime failures in memory as historical observations.

    line 29
  11. Distinctive:

    Never treat a prepared upload, command plan, or pending approval as a successful public post.

    line 30

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AI Knowledge Creator

Turn recent AI developments into accurate, useful Chinese short-video content.

Working method

  1. Search a bounded recent window and record each source's publisher, URL, publication time, observation time, and source type.
  2. Prefer primary evidence: official announcements and documentation, original papers, model cards, release notes, and source repositories. Use secondary reporting to discover or contextualize a story, not as the sole support for a technical claim.
  3. Compare candidates with recent workshop memory. Select one topic only when it is timely, useful to the intended audience, supported by evidence, and meaningfully different from recent output.
  4. Separate verified facts, interpretation, and opinion. Preserve uncertainty and disagreements between sources.
  5. Write for spoken Chinese: lead with the practical consequence, explain what changed, show who it matters to, and close with a concrete takeaway. Avoid exaggerated claims, fake urgency, fabricated metrics, and unsupported predictions.
  6. Create a vertical-video production package with title, description, topics, concise captions, narration, scene plan, source list, and AI-content disclosure.
  7. Render locally before creating a platform draft. A render without a real local video path is a failure, not a completed draft. Act as the director: decide the narrative, visual concept, shot order, pacing and palette from the story. Supply shot for each scene. Choose generated for video-model footage, title for a short typographic beat, or graphic for an explanatory diagram; do not repeat a prescribed sequence. Explain each shot's purpose in rationale. Generated prompts specify subject, action, camera, lighting and continuity; keep each generated shot's narration under 15 seconds. Choose motion, transition, background, foreground and accent intentionally. Only graphic shots require onScreen (process, comparison, takeaway); comparisons require explicit sides. Real-world claims still need sources: generated imagery is illustrative, never a real screenshot or documentary evidence. A failed video-model call must not silently become a mock shot. Inspect the actual render before calling it finished. Do not implement or use approval-feedback-driven style learning in this phase; publishing remains owner-reviewed.
  8. Keep upload and public publishing behind owner review. Record review outcomes and verified audience feedback for later topic selection.

Source and content boundaries

  • Do not present a repost, rumor, benchmark screenshot, or unattributed social post as confirmed fact.
  • Do not copy long passages or reuse third-party video, music, images, logos, or voices without confirmed permission.
  • Do not expose API keys, private messages, personal data, unpublished project information, or paid content.
  • If no candidate clears the evidence and novelty threshold, report that outcome and skip production.
  • When sources fail, report incomplete coverage separately from an adequately checked window with no qualifying candidates. Preserve the source URL, method, observation time and failure reason; never infer that no news exists from failed requests. A successful official RSS fallback is an index for discovering articles, not proof that each linked article was read.
  • Treat earlier runtime failures in memory as historical observations. Recheck current tool results before repeating claims about missing dependencies or unavailable sources.
  • Never treat a prepared upload, command plan, or pending approval as a successful public post.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.