run
Skill0 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run a Crucible benchmark for a task against a matrix of model configurations, in the background, then summarise the results. Spends usage, so it confirms first.
45 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- stunt-double/stuntdouble-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chryzxc/cpipetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jorgenschaefer/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ccomkhj/product-demotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Zmoki/zmoki-astro-startertheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- phnx-labs/agi-clitheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use doctor, plan and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkilldoctor
Diagnose an Amplifier CLI environment through the CLI doctor agent. USE WHEN a user requests CLI runtime, settings or missing-capability inspection. DO NOT USE for project bugs or other hosts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
VercelSkillsetup
Set up Vercel CLI and project configuration. Use when the user says "set up Vercel", "configure Vercel", "link to Vercel", or "vercel init".
Also in 5 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillimplement
Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillverify
End-to-end app testing pipeline for browser-based web apps on cloud browsers via Azure Playwright Workspaces: verify the live app, author tests for working flows, heal failing tests, then re-run with video and produce one consolidated report. Three phases (app verification, test authoring, test healing) plus a scoped final sanity run; each phase emits a sub-report. Use when asked to "verify my app", "make sure my app works and has good test coverage", "do a full QA pass", "add tests where I'm missing coverage", "fix failing tests and add new ones", "smoke test before deploy", "QA my deployment", or any combined verify-and-test ask. Requires Azure CLI (`az login`) and a Playwright Workspace resource ID — bootstraps configs on first invocation. Browser-based web apps with Playwright only — not for unit/API tests, native mobile/desktop, load/perf, or full accessibility audits.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions45 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 45
- perber/leafwiki★ 1.2ksame name
- NVIDIA/nvcf★ 261same name
- jjanczur/tyran★ 81same name
- Decentralized-LM/delm-agent-plugin★ 47same name
- microsoft/Employee-Self-Service-Agent-Developer-Kit★ 29same name
- phnx-labs/agi-cli★ 26same name
- doem97/cvsm★ 23same name
- JinukMoon/oh-my-mlip★ 20same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- Aloim/phaneslightplugin★ 5same name
35 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- create-taskSkill
- initSkill
- mineSkill
- reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Preview: Run the same command plus --dry-run (it costs nothing).
- Very specific: line 23
When the task has a check and --judge is on, say that the judge is advisory: the check decides success and the report shows judge …
- Distinctive: line 27
Confirm: Ask the user whether to start.
- Very specific: line 29
Run in the background: Run the real command (without --dry-run) with the Bash tool's run_in_background: true, from the repo root.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Run a benchmark
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS. The first word is the task id (a directory under .crucible/tasks/);
the rest are crucible run flags. The CLI is the only thing that runs attempts; never run
attempts yourself.
- Resolve the command. Build
crucible run .crucible/tasks/<id> <flags>. If the user gave neither--matrixnor--configs, use--matrix default. Pass--repeat,--judge-configand--max-budget-usdthrough only if the user gave them. Never raise--max-budget-usdon your own. Do not add--judgeyet; step 2 decides. - Preview. Run the same command plus
--dry-run(it costs nothing). Itscheck:line says whether the task has a check. Add--judgeonly when it sayscheck: noneor the user asked for judging, and if you add it, run the dry run again with it. Show the planned attempts and their count. Each attempt is a realclauderun, and--judgeadds a judge run per attempt. When the task has a check and--judgeis on, say that the judge is advisory: the check decides success and the report shows judge disagreements beside it. State the per-attempt budget cap from the dry run'smax budget per attemptline (the flag, else the task'smax_budget_usd, else 5.0) so the user sees the worst case. - Confirm. Ask the user whether to start. Do not run anything paid until they say yes. If they decline or change flags, redo step 2.
- Run in the background. Run the real command (without
--dry-run) with the Bash tool'srun_in_background: true, from the repo root. Tell the user it started and that they can keep working; do not wait or poll in a loop. - When it finishes (you are notified), read its output. If it exited non-zero, show the
error and stop. Otherwise run
crucible report <id>and summarise: which configurations passed, their time and cost, and the recommendation if there is one. Say plainly when the evidence is thin (few attempts, unknown results).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

