agentleFS
JaxsonmanJaxsonman/Crucible/skills/mine/SKILL.md

mine

Skill0 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Mine the repo's merged PRs (or local commits) into verified Crucible benchmark tasks. The CLI lists, verifies, scaffolds and proves; this skill only writes each task's prose and picks its kind. Spends usage, so it confirms first.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions4 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 4

    1. ohad6k/emulo★ 292same name
    2. dcbruck/claude-skills★ 1same name
    3. hurleywgly/skills★ 1same name
    4. wulfmeister/nookplot-bot★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Very specific:

    Run crucible mine calibrate --json <list flags> (add --suite NAME for one suite, --candidates N for a bigger sample, default 3).

    line 68
  2. Very specific:

    Run crucible mine --json <list flags>.

    line 87
  3. Very specific:

    Run crucible mine --verify <ids...> <list flags>.

    line 99
  4. Distinctive:

    Do nothing further until the user says yes.

    line 116
  5. Very specific:

    Leave repo, ref, source, check and the other front matter alone.

    line 141
  6. Very specific:

    No secrets, and nothing copied from non_test_diff.

    line 142
  7. Very specific:

    Run crucible mine leakcheck .crucible/tasks/<slug> (add --json to read flags programmatically).

    line 146
  8. Very specific:

    If either fails, show the error, remove that task directory (rm -r .crucible/tasks/<slug>) and report why.

    line 162

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Mine tasks from merged PRs

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS. They are passed through to crucible mine and its subcommands as --limit, --local and --max-lines (call them the list flags). Every deterministic step is a crucible command (on PATH while the plugin is enabled); run them all from the repo root. Your only jobs are the prose of each task and its kind. Never start a benchmark run and never commit.

0. Home and config

  • No .crucible/ directory: run crucible init (needs a git repo).
  • No .crucible/mine.yaml: run crucible mine. It writes a commented mine.yaml (suites auto-detected from the repo, or an empty template) and exits 0. Read the file, show the detected suites (name, test paths, cwd, setup, test command), and ask the user to confirm or edit it before going on (it is a guess; steps 1 and 2 correct it). With no suites detected, help fill one in: test_paths, cwd, setup, and a test_command ({tests} with optional |filters, or no placeholder to run the whole suite; see docs/design.md, "Placeholders"). Use only dummy values in env. If crucible mine prints config errors (exit 1), fix the file and rerun.

1. Discover how this repo runs tests

The detected suites are only a guess from marker files. Before trusting them, read what the repo really does (CI is the strongest signal) and list the files you read:

  • CI: .github/workflows/*, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile, .circleci/config.yml, azure-pipelines.yml, bitbucket-pipelines.yml.
  • Task runners: Makefile, justfile, Taskfile.yml, package.json scripts, tox.ini, noxfile.py.
  • Build files (pom.xml, build.gradle*, Cargo.toml, go.mod, *.csproj, mix.exs, Gemfile, composer.json), README / CONTRIBUTING, Dockerfile*, docker-compose*.yml and test containers.

Compare with the suites in .crucible/mine.yaml and correct them from what CI runs: cwd, setup (install and build steps), test_command, test_paths, runnable (which changed files are passed to the runner), env, timeout / setup_timeout. If the runner can't take a file list directly, write a wrapper under .crucible/scripts/; crucible exports it as $CRUCIBLE_SCRIPTS and gives it the PR's runnable test files in $CRUCIBLE_TEST_FILES (newline-separated, repo-relative; $CRUCIBLE_TEST_FILES_CWD is relative to the suite cwd):

# .crucible/scripts/run-tests.sh   (mine.yaml: test_command: bash "$CRUCIBLE_SCRIPTS/run-tests.sh")
set -euo pipefail
files=()
while IFS= read -r f; do [ -n "$f" ] && files+=("$f"); done <<< "$CRUCIBLE_TEST_FILES_CWD"
[ "${#files[@]}" -gt 0 ] || { echo "no test files" >&2; exit 2; }   # never pass an empty argument
exec ./tools/run_tests --only "${files[@]}"

setup runs before the PR's test files are copied in, so it must not need them (compile main code only: Maven compile, Gradle classes). If the toolchain is not installed on this machine (a JDK of another version, Go, an old Ruby), run it in a container from a wrapper script and note that the task then needs Docker wherever it runs. Tested recipes (Go via Docker, Gradle with JDK toolchains, Maven with JAVA_HOME, Ruby with vendor/bundle) are in docs/mining-recipes.md.

Rules: use only dummy values in env, never real secrets; prefer the repo's own test setup (for a database or queue, start the compose service in setup); keep every command non-interactive; touch nothing but .crucible/ (never edit tracked repo files). Show the user what you changed.

2. Calibrate

Run crucible mine calibrate --json <list flags> (add --suite NAME for one suite, --candidates N for a bigger sample, default 3). It runs setup at HEAD and verifies the newest candidates per suite, and takes minutes (use run_in_background: true). Output: {"ok", "suites": [{"name", "status", "detail", "setup": {"ok", "seconds", "log", "tail"}, "samples": [{"id", "outcome", "reason", "tail", "logs"}], "hints": [{"id", "hint"}]}]}. Status is ok, no-candidates (nothing to sample: not a failure, but tell the user that suite is untested), or a failure: setup-failed, no-tests-ran, not-selective, failing, timeout, mixed. For each failing suite read its status, hints (each names the mine.yaml field to change) and the log tails (open the log files for more), fix .crucible/mine.yaml or the wrapper script, and rerun. At most 5 rounds. If a suite still fails, stop and ask the user, quoting the suite name, status, hint and the last 20 log lines. Continue to step 3 once every suite is ok or no-candidates; with no-candidates only, calibration proved nothing yet, so say so and offer to continue anyway.

Per-candidate progress lines go to stderr as each finishes. If the list looks short, the walk may have been cut by --limit (the CLI hints when so); raise it.

3. List candidates

Run crucible mine --json <list flags>. Output is {"candidates": [...], "excluded": [...]}; each candidate has id, title, suites (several for a full-stack PR; it is verified across all of them), suggested_kind, lines_changed, test_files, other_files, source. (With a GitHub remote and a working gh it lists merged PRs, otherwise local commits; a gh source unavailable line on stderr is normal. --local forces local git.)

Show a short table: id, title, suggested kind, lines changed, test files. Say how many candidates were excluded and why in one line (run crucible mine --json --show-excluded only if the user asks for the list). Let the user pick: default is all, capped at 50; they may drop ids or change kinds. No candidates: say so and stop.

4. Verify

Run crucible mine --verify <ids...> <list flags>. It runs the repo's own tests at each candidate's base (must fail) and merge (must pass) and may take minutes per candidate. With more than about 5 ids use the Bash tool's run_in_background: true and wait for the notification instead of polling. Add --timeout S only if the user says tests are slow, --force only to ignore cached results. Then run crucible mine --json <list flags> again; each candidate's verified field is yes, no: <reason>, or null. Report verified vs rejected with reasons (for example passes at base, fails at merge, setup failed at base, no runnable tests); each rejection prints its log path and, when a diagnostics row matches, a hint. A rejection is a normal outcome, not an error. A verified candidate may carry warnings (skipped tests in the changed test files, or a base failure that is only a compile/type error): prefer candidates without warnings and tell the user which ones have them. If scaffold later says config changed since verification, rerun the verify. If nothing verified, stop and say what to fix (usually mine.yaml).

5. Confirm the cost

Writing prose is the only model cost. Say roughly how many tasks you will write (the verified count) and that each takes a few tool calls and a short write-up, then ask whether to continue. Do nothing further until the user says yes; offer to do a subset.

6. Scaffold and write each verified candidate

For each verified id:

  1. crucible mine scaffold <id> <list flags> (add --task-id <slug> or --kind <kind> only when needed; it warns when the task needs Docker on the machine that runs it, recorded as requires in .mine.json: tell the user). It writes .crucible/tasks/<slug>/ with task.md, check.sh, hidden_tests/ and .mine.json; note the printed path. It exits 1 with the reason if the candidate is not verified or already mined; report that and move on.
  2. crucible mine show <id> --json <list flags>: gives title, body, labels, branch, issues (linked issue title and body), test_files, other_files, test_diff and non_test_diff.
  3. Edit .crucible/tasks/<slug>/task.md and replace every _(...)_ placeholder:
    • What: the problem or feature to deliver, in the PR title, body and linked issue's own terms.
    • Why: the motivation from the PR body or issue.
    • Acceptance criteria: one observable bullet each, covering the behaviour the hidden tests check (read test_diff for what they assert). Describe the symptom and the expected behaviour. Never describe the implementation: do not quote the fix, name new functions, classes, variables or files the PR introduced, or say which file to change. The same text goes to every model config.
    • kind (front matter): keep the suggested kind unless labels, branch name and title clearly say otherwise (feature, bugfix, refactor, docs, test, or an existing kind). Leave repo, ref, source, check and the other front matter alone.
    • No secrets, and nothing copied from non_test_diff.

7. Leak check

Run crucible mine leakcheck .crucible/tasks/<slug> (add --json to read flags programmatically). clean: <slug> means done. Otherwise it exits 1 listing flags with kind (quoted-code, new-identifier, file-instruction), span, section and reason: rewrite the flagged text to describe behaviour instead (remove the identifier or file instruction, put the requirement in user-visible terms) and rerun. At most 3 tries; if still flagged, delete the task directory (rm -r .crucible/tasks/<slug>, only that path), leave it out and say so.

8. Validate and prove

Both must pass for each task:

  • crucible task validate .crucible/tasks/<slug> prints ok: <slug>.
  • crucible mine prove .crucible/tasks/<slug> runs the task's check.sh at ref (must fail) and at the merge commit (must pass) and checks for leaks; prints proven: <slug>. Use --timeout S if the user raised it in step 4. Never use --allow-leaks.

If either fails, show the error, remove that task directory (rm -r .crucible/tasks/<slug>) and report why. Do not retry beyond the leak rewrites above.

9. Summary

Report: tasks written, grouped by kind (ids and slugs); candidates rejected at verification, left out after leak rewrites, or removed after validate/prove, each with its reason. Remind the user the new tasks are uncommitted files in .crucible/tasks/ (you did not commit). Give the next command, with a real slug: /crucible:run <slug> --matrix default --repeat 3 (it asks before spending anything). Never start a run yourself.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.