follow-up
Skill33 starsChanged 11 days agoMITView on GitHub
Follow-Up. Keeps following up until a call is booked, then stops. Every morning it reads closer/pipeline.json and says who is due a follow-up today, who replied and is waiting on you, who booked, and who is stopped and why. Drafts each follow-up (a bump, then something useful, then a polite last note), waits for your yes, logs it, and stops at the first "no", the moment a call is booked, after 3 follow-ups or 30 days. Use when the user says "follow up", "who do I need to follow up with", "they haven't replied", "chase", "nudge", "bump this", "they replied", or every morning.
23 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Jakeschincariol/whale-skilledited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Celorus/celorus-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- digitalgym/aipathway-standardstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- burnoutscript/sales-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- aya-taleb/biz-boost-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- connectmachine/claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use call-prep and mock-interview.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillcall-prep
Prepare for a customer or prospect call using Common Room signals. Triggers on 'prep me for my call with [company]', 'prepare for a meeting with [company]', 'what should I know before talking to [company]', or any call preparation request.
Also in 3 projects that use this
aslavchevSkillmock-interview
Simulate a real job interview for any role. Use when user says "mock interview", "interview me", "interview prep", "practice interview", or wants to rehearse for a specific company or position. Adapts rounds and questions to the role — technical, managerial, creative, or any other.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- Jakeschincariol/whale-skill★ 1555% same
Wrote their own version · 22
- n24q02m/better-email-mcp★ 37same name
- n24q02m/email★ 37same name
- etrebels/claude-code-growth-os★ 21same name
- alejopijuan/Claude-Code-Agency-Co-Founder★ 19same name
- zime-skills/global★ 8same name
- zime-skills/zime-skills★ 8same name
- noticedso/skills★ 2same name
- palashjain95/jobhunter★ 2same name
- s1vanov/follow-up★ 2same name
- siemendev/release-process★ 2same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- contract-writerSkill
- forecasterSkill
- pipelineSkill
- proposal-writerSkill
- prospectorSkill
- record-keeperSkill
- researcherSkill
- sales-coachSkill
- schedulerSkill
- win-backSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 39
At most 3 follow-ups: after the opening, and the third one says it is the last.
- Distinctive: line 46
Follow-up 1 is two days after the opening, follow-up 2 two days after that, follow-up 3 four days after that.
- Very specific: line 57
Run /record-keeper sync first so replies are on the board.
- Distinctive: line 79
Never sends, and never records a message that did not go out.
- Distinctive: line 80
Never follows up after a no, after a booking, after 3 follow-ups or after 30 days.
- Distinctive: line 81
Never uses guilt, fake urgency, a fake "Re:" or a made-up reason to write.
- Distinctive: line 88
Stop at the first "no" or any sign of disinterest.
- Distinctive: line 89
Every email keeps the opt-out line from the opening thread.
- Distinctive: line 90
Never invent a number, a result, a client, a review or a deadline.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
follow-up
Most deals are lost to silence, not to "no". This skill makes sure nobody is forgotten and nobody is pestered. It drafts; it never sends by itself.
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} below is this skill's folder (where this SKILL.md lives).
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/followup.py" due --today 2026-10-21
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/followup.py" draft --contact dana-harbor-lane --today 2026-10-21
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/followup.py" draft --contact dana-harbor-lane --today 2026-10-23 \
--hook "here's a 1-minute mockup of what online booking could look like for Harbor Lane."
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/followup.py" record --contact dana-harbor-lane --text-file /tmp/f.txt \
--approval "yes" --at 2026-10-21T09:00
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/followup.py" reply --contact dana-harbor-lane \
--text "Sorry, crazy week! Thursday at 2 works." --at 2026-10-27T11:48
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/followup.py" stop --contact <id> --said "Please remove me from your list."The rules (per person, across every channel)
- Stop at the first "no" or any sign of disinterest ("not interested", "no thanks", "we're all set", "please remove me"). An unsubscribe goes on the suppression list, and no skill emails them again.
- Stop the moment a call is booked. That is the job.
/schedulerand/sales-coachtake over. - A reply is your turn. Answering them is a conversation, never a "follow-up".
- At most 3 follow-ups after the opening, and the third one says it is the last.
- Nothing after 30 days from the opening without a reply.
/win-backmay try once, much later.
draft refuses to draft and record refuses to log anything that breaks a rule.
The cadence
Follow-up 1 is two days after the opening, follow-up 2 two days after that, follow-up 3 four days after that. A date on a weekend moves to Monday. The reel's thread: Mon Oct 19 (opening), Wed Oct 21, Fri Oct 23, Tue Oct 27.
- Follow-up 1, the bump. One line: "just bumping this up in case it got buried."
- Follow-up 2, give something. A mockup, a number, a short idea for them.
--hookis that one new, true, specific thing. Without a hook there is no follow-up 2. - Follow-up 3, the last note. Offer a day for a call and say it is the last email. Either answer is fine.
Steps, every morning
- Run
/record-keepersync first so replies are on the board. followup.py due. Read it to the user grouped as it prints: DUE NOW, YOUR TURN, WAITING, BOOKED, STOPPED.- For each DUE NOW,
followup.py draft. Fill every[fill: ...]. Show it: "Send this follow-up to Dana? Reply yes or no." One message per question. - On a yes: a Gmail draft in the same thread from the user's account, which the user sends (or sent through
the Gmail connector right after that yes). Then
followup.py record --approval "<their yes, word for word>". - For each YOUR TURN: when they gave a time, hand it to
/scheduler(slots.py parse), confirm with theconfirm-timetemplate, and book. When they said no,followup.py replywith their words: it stops everything and marks the deal lost.
A scheduled morning run may list and draft. It never sends: nobody is there to say yes.
Example from the reel
Dana Ortiz never answered the opening. Follow-up 1 on Wed Oct 21: "just bumping this up in case it got
buried." Follow-up 2 on Fri Oct 23: the 1-minute mockup. Follow-up 3 on Tue Oct 27: "should I close the loop
on this, or is Thursday good for a quick call?" At 11:48 AM she replied, "Sorry, crazy week! Thursday at 2
works." reply moved her to YOUR TURN; the call was booked, and from then on she got no more follow-ups.
(Illustrative: Dana and Harbor Lane Dental are fictional.)
What it never does
- Never sends, and never records a message that did not go out.
- Never follows up after a no, after a booking, after 3 follow-ups or after 30 days.
- Never uses guilt, fake urgency, a fake "Re:" or a made-up reason to write.
Consent and truth
- Nothing is sent, booked or signed without the user's explicit yes for that exact message, invite or document. Claude drafts, the user says "yes", then it goes out from the user's own accounts. One yes per message. Never "yes to all".
- Stop at the first "no" or any sign of disinterest. A request to stop is honoured forever, across every skill.
- Every email keeps the opt-out line from the opening thread. Opt-outs are honoured forever.
- Never invent a number, a result, a client, a review or a deadline.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

