root-cause-tracing
Skill4 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior
- Reads credentials
15 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kazemcodes/skill-treetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ZacheryGlass/.claudeedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- OpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- PracticalSwan/agent-skillsedited, first seen Oct 19, 2026
- allanninal/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use condition-based-waiting.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
kntismSkillcondition-based-waiting
Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- OpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skills★ 4100% same
- kntism/skills★ 1100% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 7
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9k97% same
- ZacheryGlass/.claude★ 59937% same
- fimoklei/pm-ai-playbook★ 4297% same
- PracticalSwan/agent-skills★ 2266% same
- Crumbgrabber/llm_system_template_agents_skills_patterns_tools_prompts★ 396% same
- susomejias/skills★ 1100% same
- talhaMah56/claude_skills★ 086% same
Wrote their own version · 5
- withzombies/hyperpowers★ 80same name
- allanninal/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- kazemcodes/skill-tree★ 1same name
- liujiarui0918/claude-code-codex-strongest★ 1same name
- matthewharrilal/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository169 other files it gives its agents.
- epub-skill/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- linear-cli-skill/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- AgentDB Advanced FeaturesSkill
- AgentDB Learning PluginsSkill
- AgentDB Memory PatternsSkill
- AgentDB Performance OptimizationSkill
- AgentDB Vector SearchSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- agentic-jujutsuSkill
- agile-product-ownerSkill
- ai-tool-pickerSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- api-connectorSkill
- api-design-patternsSkill
- architecture-diagram-creatorSkill
- article-extractorSkill
- aws-agentic-aiSkill
- aws-cdk-developmentSkill
- aws-cost-operationsSkill
- aws-serverless-edaSkill
- biogeobearsSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- capa-officerSkill
- ceo-advisorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- code-auditorSkill
- codebase-documenterSkill
- code-executionSkill
- code-explainerSkill
- code-refactorSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-transferSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- content-research-writerSkill
- conversation-analyzerSkill
- csv-data-summarizerSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- d3-vizSkill
- dashboard-creatorSkill
- defense-in-depthSkill
- deploy-itSkill
- developer-growth-analysisSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docxSkill
- domain-name-brainstormerSkill
- dwa-councilSkill
- error-fixerSkill
- escalation-reasoningSkill
- evaluator-optimizerSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- extract-from-pdfsSkill
- fda-consultant-specialistSkill
- feature-planningSkill
- file-operationsSkill
- file-organizerSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- firebase-buddySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 2 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 73
When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation:
- Very specific: line 90
Critical: Use console.error() in tests (not logger - may not show)
- Distinctive: line 98
Look for test file names
- Common: line 104
If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
- Very specific: line 106
Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh
- Very specific: line 122
Test accessed context.tempDir before beforeEach
- Very specific: line 163
In tests: Use console.error() not logger - logger may be suppressed
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Root Cause Tracing
Overview
Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.
Core principle: Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.
When to Use
digraph when_to_use {
"Bug appears deep in stack?" [shape=diamond];
"Can trace backwards?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix at symptom point" [shape=box];
"Trace to original trigger" [shape=box];
"BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth" [shape=box];
"Bug appears deep in stack?" -> "Can trace backwards?" [label="yes"];
"Can trace backwards?" -> "Trace to original trigger" [label="yes"];
"Can trace backwards?" -> "Fix at symptom point" [label="no - dead end"];
"Trace to original trigger" -> "BETTER: Also add defense-in-depth";
}Use when:
- Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
- Stack trace shows long call chain
- Unclear where invalid data originated
- Need to find which test/code triggers the problem
The Tracing Process
1. Observe the Symptom
Error: git init failed in /Users/jesse/project/packages/core2. Find Immediate Cause
What code directly causes this?
await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: projectDir });3. Ask: What Called This?
WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir, sessionId)
→ called by Session.initializeWorkspace()
→ called by Session.create()
→ called by test at Project.create()4. Keep Tracing Up
What value was passed?
projectDir = ''(empty string!)- Empty string as
cwdresolves toprocess.cwd() - That's the source code directory!
5. Find Original Trigger
Where did empty string come from?
const context = setupCoreTest(); // Returns { tempDir: '' }
Project.create('name', context.tempDir); // Accessed before beforeEach!Adding Stack Traces
When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation:
// Before the problematic operation
async function gitInit(directory: string) {
const stack = new Error().stack;
console.error('DEBUG git init:', {
directory,
cwd: process.cwd(),
nodeEnv: process.env.NODE_ENV,
stack,
});
await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], { cwd: directory });
}Critical: Use console.error() in tests (not logger - may not show)
Run and capture:
npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG git init'Analyze stack traces:
- Look for test file names
- Find the line number triggering the call
- Identify the pattern (same test? same parameter?)
Finding Which Test Causes Pollution
If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:
Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh
./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.
Real Example: Empty projectDir
Symptom: .git created in packages/core/ (source code)
Trace chain:
git initruns inprocess.cwd()← empty cwd parameter- WorktreeManager called with empty projectDir
- Session.create() passed empty string
- Test accessed
context.tempDirbefore beforeEach - setupCoreTest() returns
{ tempDir: '' }initially
Root cause: Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value
Fix: Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach
Also added defense-in-depth:
- Layer 1: Project.create() validates directory
- Layer 2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty
- Layer 3: NODE_ENV guard refuses git init outside tmpdir
- Layer 4: Stack trace logging before git init
Key Principle
digraph principle {
"Found immediate cause" [shape=ellipse];
"Can trace one level up?" [shape=diamond];
"Trace backwards" [shape=box];
"Is this the source?" [shape=diamond];
"Fix at source" [shape=box];
"Add validation at each layer" [shape=box];
"Bug impossible" [shape=doublecircle];
"NEVER fix just the symptom" [shape=octagon, style=filled, fillcolor=red, fontcolor=white];
"Found immediate cause" -> "Can trace one level up?";
"Can trace one level up?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="yes"];
"Can trace one level up?" -> "NEVER fix just the symptom" [label="no"];
"Trace backwards" -> "Is this the source?";
"Is this the source?" -> "Trace backwards" [label="no - keeps going"];
"Is this the source?" -> "Fix at source" [label="yes"];
"Fix at source" -> "Add validation at each layer";
"Add validation at each layer" -> "Bug impossible";
}NEVER fix just where the error appears. Trace back to find the original trigger.
Stack Trace Tips
In tests: Use console.error() not logger - logger may be suppressed
Before operation: Log before the dangerous operation, not after it fails
Include context: Directory, cwd, environment variables, timestamps
Capture stack: new Error().stack shows complete call chain
Real-World Impact
From debugging session (2025-10-03):
- Found root cause through 5-level trace
- Fixed at source (getter validation)
- Added 4 layers of defense
- 1847 tests passed, zero pollution
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

