agentleFS
I-OnlabsI-Onlabs/claude-code-skills/extract_from_pdfs/SKILL.md

extract-from-pdfs

Skill4 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when extracting structured data from scientific PDFs for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or database creation. Use when working with collections of research papers that need to be converted into analyzable datasets with validation metrics.

  • Reads credentials

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not use for:

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Read the setup guide for installation and configuration:

    line 39
  3. Distinctive:

    Create custom schema from template:

    line 62
  4. Very specific:

    Add domain-specific instructions for Claude

    line 71
  5. Distinctive:

    Run the 6-step pipeline (plus optional validation):

    line 80
  6. Distinctive:

    Use imperative language in instructions.

    line 185
  7. Distinctive:

    Use conservative criteria (when in doubt, include paper) to avoid false negatives.

    line 210
  8. Distinctive:

    Use abstract filtering to reduce PDF processing

    line 225
  9. Distinctive:

    Use local Ollama for filtering (free)

    line 226
  10. Distinctive:

    Run initial extraction with baseline schema

    line 251

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Extract Structured Data from Scientific PDFs

Purpose

Extract standardized, structured data from scientific PDF literature using Claude's vision capabilities. Transform PDF collections into validated databases ready for statistical analysis in Python, R, or other frameworks.

Core capabilities:

  • Organize metadata from BibTeX, RIS, directories, or DOI lists
  • Filter papers by abstract using Claude (Haiku/Sonnet) or local models (Ollama)
  • Extract structured data from PDFs with customizable schemas
  • Repair and validate JSON outputs automatically
  • Enrich with external databases (GBIF, WFO, GeoNames, PubChem, NCBI)
  • Calculate precision/recall metrics for quality assurance
  • Export to Python, R, CSV, Excel, or SQLite

When to Use This Skill

Use when:

  • Conducting systematic literature reviews requiring data extraction
  • Building databases from scientific publications
  • Converting PDF collections to structured datasets
  • Validating extraction quality with ground truth metrics
  • Comparing extraction approaches (different models, prompts)

Do not use for:

  • Single PDF summarization (use basic PDF reading instead)
  • Full-text PDF search (use document search tools)
  • PDF editing or manipulation

Getting Started

1. Initial Setup

Read the setup guide for installation and configuration:

cat references/setup_guide.md

Key setup steps:

  • Install dependencies: conda env create -f environment.yml
  • Set API keys: export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY='your-key'
  • Optional: Install Ollama for free local filtering

2. Define Extraction Requirements

Ask the user:

  • Research domain and extraction goals
  • How PDFs are organized (reference manager, directory, DOI list)
  • Approximate collection size
  • Preferred analysis environment (Python, R, etc.)

Provide 2-3 example PDFs to analyze structure and design schema.

3. Design Extraction Schema

Create custom schema from template:

cp assets/schema_template.json my_schema.json

Customize for the specific domain:

  • Set objective describing what to extract
  • Define output_schema with field types and descriptions
  • Add domain-specific instructions for Claude
  • Provide output_example showing desired format

See assets/example_flower_visitors_schema.json for real-world ecology example.

Workflow Execution

Complete Pipeline

Run the 6-step pipeline (plus optional validation):

# Step 1: Organize metadata
python scripts/01_organize_metadata.py \
  --source-type bibtex \
  --source library.bib \
  --pdf-dir pdfs/ \
  --output metadata.json

# Step 2: Filter papers (optional - recommended)
# Choose backend: anthropic-haiku (cheap), anthropic-sonnet (accurate), ollama (free)
python scripts/02_filter_abstracts.py \
  --metadata metadata.json \
  --backend anthropic-haiku \
  --use-batches \
  --output filtered_papers.json

# Step 3: Extract from PDFs
python scripts/03_extract_from_pdfs.py \
  --metadata filtered_papers.json \
  --schema my_schema.json \
  --method batches \
  --output extracted_data.json

# Step 4: Repair JSON
python scripts/04_repair_json.py \
  --input extracted_data.json \
  --schema my_schema.json \
  --output cleaned_data.json

# Step 5: Validate with APIs
python scripts/05_validate_with_apis.py \
  --input cleaned_data.json \
  --apis my_api_config.json \
  --output validated_data.json

# Step 6: Export to analysis format
python scripts/06_export_database.py \
  --input validated_data.json \
  --format python \
  --output results

Validation (Optional but Recommended)

Calculate extraction quality metrics:

# Step 7: Sample papers for annotation
python scripts/07_prepare_validation_set.py \
  --extraction-results cleaned_data.json \
  --schema my_schema.json \
  --sample-size 20 \
  --strategy stratified \
  --output validation_set.json

# Step 8: Manually annotate (edit validation_set.json)
# Fill ground_truth field for each sampled paper

# Step 9: Calculate metrics
python scripts/08_calculate_validation_metrics.py \
  --annotations validation_set.json \
  --output validation_metrics.json \
  --report validation_report.txt

Validation produces precision, recall, and F1 metrics per field and overall.

Detailed Documentation

Access comprehensive guides in the references/ directory:

Setup and installation:

cat references/setup_guide.md

Complete workflow with examples:

cat references/workflow_guide.md

Validation methodology:

cat references/validation_guide.md

API integration details:

cat references/api_reference.md

Customization

Schema Customization

Modify my_schema.json to match the research domain:

  1. Objective: Describe what data to extract
  2. Instructions: Step-by-step extraction guidance
  3. Output schema: JSON schema defining structure
  4. Important notes: Domain-specific rules
  5. Examples: Show desired output format

Use imperative language in instructions. Be specific about data types, required vs optional fields, and edge cases.

API Configuration

Configure external database validation in my_api_config.json:

Map extracted fields to validation APIs:

  • gbif_taxonomy - Biological taxonomy
  • wfo_plants - Plant names specifically
  • geonames - Geographic locations
  • geocode - Address to coordinates
  • pubchem - Chemical compounds
  • ncbi_gene - Gene identifiers

See assets/example_api_config_ecology.json for ecology-specific example.

Filtering Customization

Edit filtering criteria in scripts/02_filter_abstracts.py (line 74):

Replace TODO section with domain-specific criteria:

  • What constitutes primary data vs review?
  • What data types are relevant?
  • What scope (geographic, temporal, taxonomic) is needed?

Use conservative criteria (when in doubt, include paper) to avoid false negatives.

Cost Optimization

Backend selection for filtering (Step 2):

  • Ollama (local): $0 - Best for privacy and high volume
  • Haiku (API): ~$0.25/M tokens - Best balance of cost/quality
  • Sonnet (API): ~$3/M tokens - Best for complex filtering

Typical costs for 100 papers:

  • With filtering (Haiku + Sonnet): ~$4
  • With local Ollama + Sonnet: ~$3.75
  • Without filtering (Sonnet only): ~$7.50

Optimization strategies:

  • Use abstract filtering to reduce PDF processing
  • Use local Ollama for filtering (free)
  • Enable prompt caching with --use-caching
  • Process in batches with --use-batches

Quality Assurance

Validation workflow provides:

  • Precision: % of extracted items that are correct
  • Recall: % of true items that were extracted
  • F1 score: Harmonic mean of precision and recall
  • Per-field metrics: Identify weak fields

Use metrics to:

  • Establish baseline extraction quality
  • Compare different approaches (models, prompts, schemas)
  • Identify areas for improvement
  • Report extraction quality in publications

Recommended sample sizes:

  • Small projects (<100 papers): 10-20 papers
  • Medium projects (100-500 papers): 20-50 papers
  • Large projects (>500 papers): 50-100 papers

Iterative Improvement

  1. Run initial extraction with baseline schema
  2. Validate on sample using Steps 7-9
  3. Analyze field-level metrics and error patterns
  4. Revise schema, prompts, or model selection
  5. Re-extract and re-validate
  6. Compare metrics to verify improvement
  7. Repeat until acceptable quality achieved

See references/validation_guide.md for detailed guidance on interpreting metrics and improving extraction quality.

Available Scripts

Data organization:

  • scripts/01_organize_metadata.py - Standardize PDFs and metadata

Filtering:

  • scripts/02_filter_abstracts.py - Filter by abstract (Haiku/Sonnet/Ollama)

Extraction:

  • scripts/03_extract_from_pdfs.py - Extract from PDFs with Claude vision

Processing:

  • scripts/04_repair_json.py - Repair and validate JSON
  • scripts/05_validate_with_apis.py - Enrich with external databases
  • scripts/06_export_database.py - Export to analysis formats

Validation:

  • scripts/07_prepare_validation_set.py - Sample papers for annotation
  • scripts/08_calculate_validation_metrics.py - Calculate P/R/F1 metrics

Assets

Templates:

  • assets/schema_template.json - Blank extraction schema template
  • assets/api_config_template.json - API validation configuration template

Examples:

  • assets/example_flower_visitors_schema.json - Ecology extraction example
  • assets/example_api_config_ecology.json - Ecology API validation example

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.