paper-self-review
Skill27 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Adversarially review a paper before submission and predict exactly what reviewers will attack, using the five-category rejection checklist (contribution, writing clarity, result strength, experimental coverage, method soundness) plus a claim-to-evidence audit. Produces a findings report with a verdict per item, not vague impressions. Use whenever the user asks if a paper is ready, what reviewers will say, whether the contribution is enough, whether they will get rejected, or asks you to review someone else's submission — and run it proactively before any submission deadline, because the checklist routinely surfaces a missing ablation or an unsupported abstract claim while there is still time to fix it. Boundary: this predicts what gets attacked and produces the findings list; actually rewriting what it finds is paper-revision. 中文触发:自评审、review论文、审稿、会不会被拒、contribution够不够、投稿前检查、adversarial writing、帮我看看这篇论文。
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yvesory/academic-research-suitetheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- jiahao-shao1/sjh-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 25, 2026
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholartheir own version, first seen Apr 15, 2026
- Clay-HHK/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 5, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar★ 5.9ksame name
- jiahao-shao1/sjh-skills★ 43same name
- yvesory/academic-research-suite★ 9same name
- Clay-HHK/claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- figure-composerSkill
- figure-styleSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- paper-narrativeSkill
- paper-revisionSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- pdf-exploreSkill
- research-experimentSkill
- research-ideationSkill
- research-methodologySkill
- research-projectSkill
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

