paper-revision
Skill27 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Revise paper text in response to criticism — your own, an advisor's, or a reviewer's. Two halves that share one discipline: (1) fixing prose by encoding it back into a high-level outline, locating where the logic is missing or jumps, fixing it there, then decoding to English again, plus the sentence-flow test and paragraph-clarity checks; (2) writing a rebuttal, which first answers why each reviewer gave that score, classifies every concern into answerable-from-existing-content / needs-new-experiment / misunderstanding / genuine-limitation, then drafts per reviewer section in their own question order. Use whenever the user pastes text to improve, says the writing is unclear or doesn't flow, is working through comments on a draft, mentions receiving reviews or scores, or asks how to answer a weakness — and resist polishing sentences directly, because smooth prose over a broken outline is the hardest failure to detect later. Boundary: this fixes text that exists; if the question is whether the paper will survive review at all rather than whether a passage is clear, that is paper-self-review. 中文触发:改论文、改写作、这段写得清楚吗、句子不通顺、flow、润色、逻辑不连贯、reverse outline、rebuttal、回复审稿意见、收到review了、weakness怎么答、提分。
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TerryFYL/ai-research-armytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- willlee1995/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- parkjui92/socsci-paper-kittheir own version, first seen Sep 26, 2026
- dongzhigang13305312738-art/paper-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 21, 2026
- sergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026their own version, first seen May 13, 2026
- lingzhi227/agent-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 20, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- lingzhi227/agent-research-skills★ 350same name
- sergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026★ 9same name
- TerryFYL/ai-research-army★ 9same name
- parkjui92/socsci-paper-kit★ 5same name
- dongzhigang13305312738-art/paper-skills★ 1same name
- willlee1995/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- figure-composerSkill
- figure-styleSkill
- literature-reviewSkill
- paper-narrativeSkill
- paper-self-reviewSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- pdf-exploreSkill
- research-experimentSkill
- research-ideationSkill
- research-methodologySkill
- research-projectSkill
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

