mcp-supabase
Skill337 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute database operations via Supabase MCP (query/write/migration/logs/type generation). Triggers: query/statistics/export/insert/update/delete/fix/backfill/migrate/logs/alerts/type generation. Does not trigger for: pure architecture discussion or code planning. Write operations require confirmation; UPDATE/DELETE without WHERE is refused.
In this repository40 other files it gives its agents.
- review-clean-codeSkill
- review-doc-consistencySkill
- review-merge-readinessSkill
- workflow-execute-plansSkill
- workflow-template-extractorSkill
- workflow-template-seederSkill
- cloudflareSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- mcp-cloudflareSkill
- mcp-stripeSkill
- publish-x-articleSkill
- review-clean-codeSkill
- review-doc-consistencySkill
- review-merge-readinessSkill
- review-qualitySkill
- review-react-best-practicesSkill
- review-seo-auditSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-evolutionSkill
- skill-improverSkill
- stripeSkill
- supabaseSkill
- tool-ast-grep-rulesSkill
- tool-better-authSkill
- tool-design-style-selectorSkill
- tool-hooks-doctorSkill
- tool-openclawSkill
- tool-programmatic-seoSkill
- tool-schema-markupSkill
- tool-systematic-debuggingSkill
- tool-ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- tool-x-article-publisherSkill
- workflow-brainstormSkill
- workflow-creatorSkill
- workflow-execute-plansSkill
- workflow-feature-shipperSkill
- workflow-project-intakeSkill
- workflow-ship-fasterSkill
- workflow-template-extractorSkill
- workflow-template-seederSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
When proposing changes, cite the relevant rule file path (for example: …
- Distinctive: line 38
When integrating database operations into multi-step workflows, persist all context and artifacts to disk, passing only paths between …
- Distinctive: line 67
Read first: Always check schema before any operation
- Very specific: line 68
Default LIMIT 50: All SELECT queries default to LIMIT 50, unless user explicitly requests more
- Distinctive: line 73
No bare writes: UPDATE/DELETE without WHERE condition → refuse directly, do not execute
- Distinctive: line 76
Production environment: Write disabled by default.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Supabase MCP Skill
Interact with Supabase database via MCP tools, execute queries, writes, migrations, and diagnostics.
Scope
Applies to:
- Need to perform "database actions" on Supabase: query/statistics/export, write (after confirmation), migration (DDL), type generation, query logs/advisors
Does not apply to:
- Need to complete "integration implementation" in Next.js project (env/client code/minimal data access layer/project structure)
→ Useworkflow-ship-faster(Step 6: Supabase integration) for project-side setup; this skill only handles DB-side actions and gates
Called by:
workflow-ship-fasteruses this skill as DB operation foundation;workflow-ship-fasterhandles project-side integration, this skill handles DB-side actions and security gates
Postgres Best Practices (Bundled)
Ship Faster vendors Supabase's Postgres best practices inside the supabase skill (install supabase alongside this skill if you want these references available locally):
- Full guide:
supabase/references/postgres-best-practices/AGENTS.md - Individual rules:
supabase/references/postgres-best-practices/rules/*.md
Consult it when:
- Writing/reviewing/optimizing SQL queries
- Designing indexes, schema changes, or RLS policies
- Diagnosing performance, locking, or connection issues
When proposing changes, cite the relevant rule file path (for example: supabase/references/postgres-best-practices/rules/query-missing-indexes.md) and keep changes minimal.
File-based Pipeline (Pass Paths Only)
When integrating database operations into multi-step workflows, persist all context and artifacts to disk, passing only paths between agents/sub-agents.
Recommended directory structure (within project): runs/<workflow>/active/<run_id>/
- Input:
01-input/goal.md(requirements),01-input/context.json(known tables/fields/IDs) - Plan:
03-plans/sql.md(SQL to execute; write operations must be written here before confirmation) - Output:
05-final/result.md(conclusion + key numbers + SQL + truncated results) - Logs:
logs/events.jsonl(summary of each tool call; do not log sensitive field values)
Tool Reference
| Tool | Parameters | Purpose |
list_tables | {"schemas":["public"]} | List all tables in specified schema |
execute_sql | {"query":"SELECT ..."} | Execute SQL (query or DML) |
apply_migration | {"name":"snake_case_name","query":"-- DDL"} | Apply database migration |
list_migrations | {} | View existing migrations |
generate_typescript_types | {} | Generate TypeScript type definitions |
get_project_url | {} | Get project URL |
get_publishable_keys | {} | Get public API keys |
get_logs | {"service":"postgres|api|auth|storage|realtime|edge-function|branch-action"} | Query service logs |
get_advisors | {"type":"security|performance"} | Get security/performance recommendations |
Optional tools (if enabled):
- Edge Functions:
list_edge_functions,get_edge_function,deploy_edge_function - Branching:
create_branch,list_branches,merge_branch,reset_branch,rebase_branch,delete_branch
Security Rules (Must Follow)
- Read first: Always check schema before any operation
- Default LIMIT 50: All SELECT queries default to
LIMIT 50, unless user explicitly requests more - Write operation confirmation: INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE must before execution:
- Display the SQL to be executed
- State expected number of affected rows
- Await explicit user confirmation
- No bare writes: UPDATE/DELETE without WHERE condition → refuse directly, do not execute
- Batch threshold: Affecting > 100 rows → force double confirmation + suggest
SELECT count(*)first - DDL via migration: Schema changes must use
apply_migration,execute_sqlcannot run DDL directly - Production environment: Write disabled by default; only allow when user explicitly says "execute on prod" and double confirms
- Sensitive fields: email/phone/token/password are masked or not returned by default, unless user explicitly requests
Operation Flow
1. Parse requirements → restate objective
2. Unsure about tables/fields → first list_tables or execute_sql to query information_schema
3. Plan SQL → present to user
4. Read-only → execute directly
5. Write operation → confirm before execution → verify affected rows → report resultOutput Format
- Language: English
- Structure: Conclusion → Key numbers → Executed SQL → Result table (max 50 rows)
- Overflow handling: Truncate + show total count + optional export/pagination
Example output:
✅ Query complete: 142 new users in the last 7 days
Executed SQL:
SELECT DATE(created_at) as date, COUNT(*) as count
FROM user_profiles
WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days'
GROUP BY DATE(created_at) ORDER BY date DESC;
| date | count |
|------------|-------|
| 2025-01-09 | 23 |
| 2025-01-08 | 31 |
| ... | ... |Error Handling
| Situation | Action |
| SQL syntax error | Return error summary + fix suggestions |
| Insufficient permissions | Explain required permissions + alternatives |
| No data returned | Explain possible reasons (conditions too strict? data doesn't exist?) |
| RLS blocked | Suggest checking RLS policy or using service_role |
Example Dialogues
Read: Simple Query
User: Get registered user count for the last 7 days, by day
Execution:
1. Confirm table user_profiles, field created_at
2. Execute aggregation SQL
3. Return: conclusion + numbers + SQL + tableRead: Complex Query
User: Find projects that have runs but all failed
Execution:
1. Confirm projects, runs tables and status field
2. Present JOIN + aggregation SQL
3. Execute and return results (mask email)Write: Insert
User: Create a new run for project xxx
Execution:
1. First check if project exists
2. Present INSERT SQL + expected impact: 1 row
3. Await confirmation → execute → return new record idWrite: Update
User: Change run abc's status to completed
Execution:
1. First SELECT to verify current state
2. Present UPDATE SQL + WHERE id = 'abc'
3. Confirm → execute → SELECT again to verifyDangerous: Delete
User: Delete all runs where status = 'failed'
Execution:
1. First SELECT count(*) WHERE status = 'failed'
2. Present count + DELETE SQL
3. If > 100 rows, force double confirmation
4. After confirmation execute → report deleted row countDangerous: DELETE without WHERE
User: Clear the runs table
Execution:
❌ Refuse to execute
→ Prompt: DELETE without WHERE condition, this will delete all data
→ Suggest: Use TRUNCATE (requires migration) or add explicit conditionSchema Reference
Get latest schema at runtime:
-- List all tables
SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables
WHERE table_schema = 'public';
-- View table structure
SELECT column_name, data_type, is_nullable
FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name = '<table_name>';For project-specific schema (may be outdated), see schema.md. Default to information_schema / generate_typescript_types as source of truth.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

