review-checkpoint
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Run blocker-only branch reviews through a native read-only reviewer subagent. Direct review requests are read-only; explicit fix loops and coordinating workflows may apply deterministic in-scope fixes.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-aeoSkill
- agent-memorySkill
- beanquerySkill
- ci-repairbaySkill
- delegated-developmentSkill
- ghSkill
- issue-blueprintSkill
- issue-workbenchSkill
- minifluxSkill
- og-imageSkill
- opSkill
- pencil-to-figma-migrationSkill
- pr-comment-sweepSkill
- pr-launchpadSkill
- repo-surveyorSkill
- review-repairbaySkill
- shipyardSkill
- skill-optimizerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Use one native read-only reviewer subagent as the branch-diff gate.
- Very specific: line 28
Stop when the budget is spent, a finding repeats after its targeted fix, or a later finding contradicts an accepted one.
- Very specific: line 42
No actionable blocker -> PASS.
- Very specific: line 46
When manifest_path is set, record pass, blocker, or tooling-failure events through:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Review Checkpoint
Use one native read-only reviewer subagent as the branch-diff gate. Review is read-only unless fix_loop is explicitly authorized or selected by a coordinating workflow.
Inputs
mode:review_only(direct default) orfix_loop(explicit fix/coordinator default).max_iterations: default3.review_base: optional caller-provided base ref.manifest_path: optional and only for Shipyard's integration review; child reviews keep isolated state in their handoffs.
Memory
Direct invocation owns $agent-memory; nested Workbench or Shipyard invocation
defers it to the caller. Capture only accepted durable review rules or reusable
root causes.
Findings and authorization
- Classify findings as
spec_blocker(acceptance or unrequested behavior),standards_blocker(repository rules),safety_blocker(data, secrets, security, or forbidden paths),test_blocker(missing or misleading validation), ornon_actionable. - A blocker is actionable only when deterministic, in scope, and fixable without a product decision. Cosmetic, speculative, stale, broad, unclear, contradictory, or out-of-scope findings are
non_actionable. review_onlynever edits.fix_loopfixes only actionable findings and each iteration must reduce that set. Do not loop on non-actionable findings.- Stop when the budget is spent, a finding repeats after its targeted fix, or a later finding contradicts an accepted one. Record contradictions as
non_actionable: contradictory semantics.
Review loop
- Require a clean worktree except local
.context/progress.mdand a named local branch. Resolvereview_base,base_sha, andhead_sha; the reviewed branch does not need an upstream. - For the current
(base_sha, head_sha), spawn exactly one native read-only reviewer subagent withfork_turns=none, choosing the least-cost sufficient reviewer role under repository instructions. Do not use an external review service or substitute a local self-review. - Give the reviewer the absolute worktree, branch, base and head SHAs, reproducible diff refs, task requirements, repository instructions, and validation evidence. Require it to inspect the actual diff and relevant callers/tests, make no edits or state changes, and return only
PASSor blocker findings with taxonomy, file/line evidence, impact, and the smallest credible fix. - Validate each finding against scope and current
HEAD; reclassify unsupported findings asnon_actionable. - The final gate is the latest completed subagent review with no later commit. If no reviewer subagent is available or it fails without a result, return
BLOCKEDwith the tooling failure.
Append compact review history to .context/review-events.jsonl; do not create per-review folders.
Complete or fix
- No actionable blocker ->
PASS. - Actionable blockers in
review_only->BLOCKEDwith findings and no edits. - In
fix_loop, apply the smallest fix, inspect the diff, run the smallest relevant check, commit inspected files, and return to Step 1 for the newHEAD.
When manifest_path is set, record pass, blocker, or tooling-failure events through:
python3 <shipyard_dir>/scripts/manifest.py --manifest <manifest_path> set-review --file <event_file>A passing integration event must contain status:"PASS", current branch, base_sha, and exact reviewed head_sha; return PASS only after the manifest accepts it.
Output
Return PASS or BLOCKED with mode, reviewer role, reviewed base/head SHAs, checks, and unresolved actionable blockers.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

