pr-launchpad
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Create or publish a GitHub or GitLab pull request when asked to open or create a PR. Use when must inspect the actual diff, commit pending work with Conventional Commits, push the current branch, and create a PR with a Conventional Commit title and fixed body template.
- Commits and pushes
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-aeoSkill
- agent-memorySkill
- beanquerySkill
- ci-repairbaySkill
- delegated-developmentSkill
- ghSkill
- issue-blueprintSkill
- issue-workbenchSkill
- minifluxSkill
- og-imageSkill
- opSkill
- pencil-to-figma-migrationSkill
- pr-comment-sweepSkill
- repo-surveyorSkill
- review-checkpointSkill
- review-repairbaySkill
- shipyardSkill
- skill-optimizerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 40
Write the multiline body to a temporary file or heredoc.
- Very specific: line 47
After create or reuse, when shipyard_manifest is present, require:
- Distinctive: line 72
Use one closure bullet per clearly resolved issue.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
pr-launchpad
Publish the current branch as a pull request.
Inputs and Memory
base_branchdefaults to the repository default branch.issue_numberorissue_numbersmay come from input, branch, or title.validated_headplus non-emptyvalidationcommands/results may come from nestedissue-workbench.shipyard_manifestsupplies only close targets, child heads, checks/skips, and review status.
Direct invocation owns $agent-memory; nested invocation defers it to
issue-workbench or shipyard.
Procedure
- Resolve the base, preferring its remote-tracking ref. Inspect
git status --short,git log --oneline <base>...HEAD, the committed branch diff, and staged and unstaged diffs. Do not commit.context/,.agents/, or local progress. Stop when unrelated changes make intended scope ambiguous; otherwise make the focused Conventional Commit. - Reuse HEAD-bound validation before running a check. With a manifest, first
run
python3 <shipyard_dir>/scripts/manifest.py --manifest <shipyard_manifest> can-reuse $(git rev-parse HEAD)and reuse recorded evidence only on success. Without a manifest, reuse nested Workbench evidence only whenvalidated_headequals currentHEADand validation is non-empty. Otherwise run the smallest relevant non-destructive validation; state honestly when no relevant check exists. - Derive a Conventional Commit PR title and the fixed body below from the live diff and validation. Manifest evidence never overrides git.
- Resolve the upstream and its SHA. Push with
git push --set-upstream origin HEADwhen absent,git pushwhen its SHA differs fromHEAD, and do not push when they already match. - Write the multiline body to a temporary file or heredoc. Before creating,
query open PRs/MRs whose source is the current branch (
gh pr list --head <branch>or theglabequivalent). Reuse exactly one only when its source branch, resolved base, and issue/diff scope match; refresh its title/body to the fixed values when needed. If multiple candidates exist, or a same-branch request has a different base or scope, stop instead of creating a duplicate. Otherwise create against the resolved base. After create or reuse, when
shipyard_manifestis present, require:python3 <shipyard_dir>/scripts/manifest.py --manifest <shipyard_manifest> set-pr <url>An explicitly waived or replaced unavailable external review check is recorded as
Pending external unavailable check: <check>in caller/progress context, not routed to repair skills.- Compact
.context/progress.mdwithout suppressing a created or reused PR URL.
## Summary
- <2 to 4 bullets covering the main changes>
## Testing
- <commands actually run or an honest reason none applied>
## Close Issue
- Closes #<issue_number>Use one closure bullet per clearly resolved issue; otherwise omit the section. Reply with only the PR URL.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

