executive-dashboard
Skill41 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Executive KPI generation including MTTR, MTBF, resolution rates, and report data aggregation
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- teachskillofskills-ai/DigitalMarketingPro-techshutheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-protheir own version, first seen Feb 12, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-team★ 1same name
- teachskillofskills-ai/DigitalMarketingPro-techshu★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository184 other files it gives its agents.
- happy-platform-skillsSkill
- application-scopeSkill
- batch-operationsSkill
- configuration-validationSkill
- deployment-workflowSkill
- generic-crud-operationsSkill
- instance-managementSkill
- schema-discoverySkill
- script-executionSkill
- script-syncSkill
- smart-assessmentSkill
- task-analysisSkill
- task-summarizationSkill
- update-set-managementSkill
- user-provisioningSkill
- workflow-creationSkill
- workspace-insightsSkill
- approval-summarizationSkill
- approval-workflowsSkill
- catalog-builder-aiSkill
- catalog-item-generationSkill
- item-creationSkill
- multi-turn-orderingSkill
- request-fulfillmentSkill
- ui-policiesSkill
- variable-managementSkill
- ci-discoverySkill
- cmdb-search-analysisSkill
- data-qualitySkill
- impact-analysisSkill
- relationship-mappingSkill
- service-graph-diagnosisSkill
- activity-responseSkill
- csm-case-summarizationSkill
- chat-recommendationSkill
- email-recommendationSkill
- csm-kb-generationSkill
- resolution-notesSkill
- csm-sentiment-analysisSkill
- csm-sidebar-summarizationSkill
- csm-suggested-stepsSkill
- trending-topicsSkill
- automated-testingSkill
- business-rulesSkill
- client-scriptsSkill
- code-assistSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- data-importSkill
- debugging-techniquesSkill
- fluent-sdkSkill
- glide-api-referenceSkill
- mcp-server-installationSkill
- mcp-serverSkill
- notificationsSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- scheduled-jobsSkill
- scripted-rest-apisSkill
- script-includesSkill
- servicenow-docs-mcpSkill
- test-generationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 41
Access: Read access to incident, problem, change_request, and task tables
- Distinctive: line 236
If using ServiceNow survey:
- Distinctive: line 302
Consistent Time Windows: Always use the same time period for comparisons (30 days recommended)
- Distinctive: line 314
Solution: Use business_duration field if available, or filter by business schedule
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Executive Dashboard
Overview
This skill generates executive-level ITSM KPIs and dashboard data for ServiceNow. It enables you to:
- Calculate MTTR (Mean Time to Resolve) and MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures)
- Generate incident resolution and first contact resolution rates
- Aggregate data for executive dashboards
- Compare performance across time periods
- Identify trends requiring executive attention
When to use: For preparing executive briefings, board reports, monthly IT performance reviews, or automated dashboard data generation.
Prerequisites
- Roles:
report_admin,itil, oranalytics_admin - Access: Read access to incident, problem, change_request, and task tables
- Knowledge: Understanding of ITSM KPI definitions and organizational targets
- Data: Minimum 30 days of historical data for meaningful metrics
Procedure
Step 1: Calculate Mean Time to Resolve (MTTR)
MTTR measures the average time from incident creation to resolution.
Using MCP (Claude Code/Desktop):
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: state=6^resolved_atISNOTEMPTY^resolved_atONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,number,sys_created_on,resolved_at,priority,category
limit: 1000Using REST API:
GET /api/now/table/incident?sysparm_query=state=6^resolved_atISNOTEMPTY^resolved_atONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)&sysparm_fields=sys_id,number,sys_created_on,resolved_at,priority,category&sysparm_limit=1000Calculate MTTR:
// For each incident:
// Resolution Time = resolved_at - sys_created_on
// MTTR = Sum of all Resolution Times / Count of Resolved Incidents
// Example calculation (in hours):
Total Resolution Time: 2,400 hours
Resolved Incidents: 150
MTTR = 2,400 / 150 = 16 hoursMTTR by Priority (Target Benchmarks):
| Priority | Target MTTR | Industry Benchmark |
| P1 - Critical | < 4 hours | 2-4 hours |
| P2 - High | < 8 hours | 4-8 hours |
| P3 - Moderate | < 24 hours | 8-24 hours |
| P4 - Low | < 72 hours | 24-72 hours |
Step 2: Calculate Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)
MTBF measures reliability - average time between recurring incidents for the same CI or service.
Query CI-Related Incidents:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: cmdb_ciISNOTEMPTY^sys_created_onONLast 90 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(90)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,number,cmdb_ci,sys_created_on,category
limit: 2000
order_by: cmdb_ci,sys_created_onCalculate MTBF per CI:
// Group incidents by CI
// For CIs with multiple incidents:
// MTBF = Total operating time / (Number of failures - 1)
// Example for Server-001:
// Incident 1: Jan 5
// Incident 2: Jan 20
// Incident 3: Feb 10
// Time between: 15 days + 21 days = 36 days / 2 = 18 days MTBFMTBF Target Benchmarks:
| Service Tier | Target MTBF |
| Tier 1 (Critical) | > 30 days |
| Tier 2 (Important) | > 14 days |
| Tier 3 (Standard) | > 7 days |
Step 3: Calculate Resolution Rates
First Contact Resolution (FCR) Rate:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: state=6^resolved_atONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)^reassignment_count=0
fields: sys_id,number
limit: 1000Total Resolved (Last 30 Days): Query count of all resolved incidents
FCR Count: Query count with reassignment_count=0
FCR Rate = (FCR Count / Total Resolved) * 100Reopen Rate:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: reopen_count>0^sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,number,reopen_count
limit: 500Reopen Rate = (Incidents with reopen_count > 0 / Total Resolved) * 100
Target: < 5%Step 4: Incident Volume Metrics
Total Incident Volume:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,priority,category,state
limit: 5000Volume by Priority: Process results to count by priority field.
Backlog Analysis:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: active=true^state!=6^state!=7
fields: sys_id,priority,sys_created_on,assigned_to
limit: 1000Backlog Metrics:
- Total Open: Count of active incidents
- Aging > 7 days: Filter by sys_created_on
- Unassigned: Filter by assigned_toISEMPTYStep 5: Change Success Rate
Query Completed Changes:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: change_request
query: state=3^closed_atONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,number,close_code,type
limit: 500Close Code Analysis:
| Close Code | Category |
| successful | Success |
| successful_issues | Success with Issues |
| unsuccessful | Failure |
| cancelled | Cancelled |
Change Success Rate = (Successful + Successful with Issues) / (Total - Cancelled) * 100
Target: > 95%Step 6: Problem Management Metrics
Problems Created vs. Resolved:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: problem
query: sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,number,state,known_error,first_reported_by_task
limit: 200Known Error Database (KEDB) Growth:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: problem
query: known_error=true
fields: sys_id,number,sys_created_on
limit: 500Step 7: Customer Satisfaction (CSAT)
If using ServiceNow survey:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: asmt_assessment_instance
query: metric_type.nameSTARTSWITHIncident^sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,state,percent_answered
limit: 500Step 8: Generate Aggregated Report Data
Using GlideAggregate Pattern (via Background Script):
Tool: SN-Execute-Background-Script
Parameters:
script: |
var ga = new GlideAggregate('incident');
ga.addQuery('sys_created_on', '>=', gs.daysAgo(30));
ga.addAggregate('COUNT');
ga.addAggregate('COUNT', 'priority');
ga.groupBy('priority');
ga.query();
var results = [];
while (ga.next()) {
results.push({
priority: ga.getValue('priority'),
count: ga.getAggregate('COUNT')
});
}
gs.info('Priority Distribution: ' + JSON.stringify(results));
description: Aggregate incident counts by priorityTool Usage
MCP Tools Reference
| Tool | When to Use |
SN-Query-Table | Primary tool for querying metrics data |
SN-Natural-Language-Search | Natural language queries for quick insights |
SN-Execute-Background-Script | Complex aggregations using GlideAggregate |
REST API Reference
| Endpoint | Method | Purpose |
/api/now/table/incident | GET | Query incident data |
/api/now/table/change_request | GET | Query change data |
/api/now/table/problem | GET | Query problem data |
/api/now/stats/{table} | GET | Aggregate statistics |
Key Fields for Metrics
| Metric | Source Table | Key Fields |
| MTTR | incident | sys_created_on, resolved_at |
| FCR | incident | reassignment_count |
| Reopen Rate | incident | reopen_count |
| Change Success | change_request | close_code, state |
| MTBF | incident | cmdb_ci, sys_created_on |
Best Practices
- Consistent Time Windows: Always use the same time period for comparisons (30 days recommended)
- Business Calendar: Exclude weekends/holidays if measuring business time
- Baseline First: Establish baselines before setting targets
- Segment Data: Break down by priority, category, and team for actionable insights
- Automate Collection: Schedule regular data pulls for dashboard refresh
- ITIL Alignment: Align KPIs with ITIL Continual Service Improvement (CSI)
Troubleshooting
"MTTR seems too high"
Cause: Including paused time or non-business hours Solution: Use business_duration field if available, or filter by business schedule
"Resolution counts don't match reports"
Cause: Different date fields being used (resolved_at vs closed_at vs sys_updated_on) Solution: Standardize on resolved_at for resolution metrics
"MTBF calculation returning errors"
Cause: CIs with single incident cannot calculate MTBF Solution: Filter to CIs with 2+ incidents; use "N/A" for single-incident CIs
"Change success rate very low"
Cause: Cancelled changes being counted as failures Solution: Exclude state=cancelled from total; only count closed changes
Examples
Example 1: Weekly Executive Summary
Objective: Generate weekly IT performance summary
Queries to Execute:
- Incident Volume:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: sys_created_onONLast 7 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(7)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,priority
limit: 500- Resolved Incidents:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: resolved_atONLast 7 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(7)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,sys_created_on,resolved_at,priority
limit: 500- Current Backlog:
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: active=true
fields: sys_id,priority,sys_created_on
limit: 500Output Report:
=== WEEKLY IT PERFORMANCE SUMMARY ===
Week Ending: [Date]
INCIDENT MANAGEMENT:
| Metric | This Week | Last Week | Change |
|--------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Created | 145 | 132 | +10% |
| Resolved | 152 | 140 | +9% |
| Backlog | 48 | 55 | -13% |
| MTTR (hours) | 14.2 | 15.8 | -10% |
PRIORITY BREAKDOWN:
| Priority | Created | Resolved | Backlog |
|----------|---------|----------|---------|
| P1 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| P2 | 22 | 25 | 8 |
| P3 | 78 | 80 | 25 |
| P4 | 42 | 43 | 14 |
KEY HIGHLIGHTS:
- MTTR improved by 10% (14.2 hours vs 15.8 hours)
- Backlog reduced by 13% (48 vs 55)
- P1 incidents: 3 created, all resolved or in progress
ITEMS REQUIRING ATTENTION:
- None - all metrics within targetExample 2: Monthly KPI Dashboard Data
Objective: Generate all KPIs for monthly dashboard
Execute All Queries in Parallel:
// Query 1: Total Incidents
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: incident
query: sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,priority,category,state,reassignment_count,reopen_count,sys_created_on,resolved_at
limit: 2000
// Query 2: Changes
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: change_request
query: sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,type,close_code,state
limit: 500
// Query 3: Problems
Tool: SN-Query-Table
Parameters:
table_name: problem
query: sys_created_onONLast 30 days@javascript:gs.daysAgoStart(30)@javascript:gs.daysAgoEnd(0)
fields: sys_id,state,known_error
limit: 200Calculated Dashboard Data:
{
"period": "2024-01-01 to 2024-01-31",
"incident_management": {
"total_created": 612,
"total_resolved": 598,
"mttr_hours": 14.5,
"mttr_by_priority": {
"P1": 3.2,
"P2": 7.8,
"P3": 18.4,
"P4": 48.2
},
"fcr_rate": 72.5,
"reopen_rate": 3.2,
"backlog": 52
},
"change_management": {
"total_changes": 89,
"success_rate": 97.8,
"by_type": {
"standard": 45,
"normal": 38,
"emergency": 6
}
},
"problem_management": {
"problems_created": 12,
"problems_resolved": 8,
"known_errors_added": 5
},
"trends": {
"incident_volume_change": "+5%",
"mttr_change": "-8%",
"backlog_change": "-12%"
}
}Example 3: Board-Level Summary
Objective: High-level summary for board presentation
=== IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT - BOARD SUMMARY ===
Period: Q4 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
IT Service Management delivered 97% SLA compliance in Q4,
exceeding the 95% target. Major incident count reduced by
25% compared to Q3.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS:
Q4 2024 Q3 2024 Target Status
Service Availability 99.8% 99.5% 99.5% PASS
SLA Compliance 97.0% 94.2% 95.0% PASS
MTTR (hours) 12.4 15.2 16.0 PASS
Change Success Rate 98.2% 96.8% 95.0% PASS
Customer Satisfaction 4.2/5 4.0/5 4.0/5 PASS
Major Incidents 3 4 <5 PASS
YEAR-OVER-YEAR COMPARISON:
| Metric | 2024 | 2023 | Improvement |
|--------|------|------|-------------|
| Total Incidents | 7,245 | 8,102 | -11% |
| MTTR | 13.2 hrs | 18.4 hrs | -28% |
| SLA Compliance | 96.5% | 92.1% | +4.4% |
INVESTMENTS & OUTCOMES:
- AI-powered triage: 15% reduction in assignment time
- Self-service portal: 22% ticket deflection
- Automation: 400+ hours saved monthly
RISKS & MITIGATIONS:
- Aging infrastructure causing 30% of P1 incidents
Mitigation: Data center refresh approved for Q2 2025Related Skills
reporting/sla-analysis- Detailed SLA performance trackingreporting/trend-analysis- Incident trends and patternsitsm/incident-lifecycle- Full incident managementitsm/problem-analysis- Problem management metrics
References
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

