ads-meta
Skill102 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Meta Ads deep analysis covering Facebook and Instagram advertising. Evaluates 50 checks across Pixel/CAPI health, creative diversity and fatigue, account structure, and audience targeting. Includes Advantage+ assessment. Use when user says Meta Ads, Facebook Ads, Instagram Ads, Advantage+, or Meta campaign.
- Reads credentials
12 other projects use a version of this, 8 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- oivanfelipe/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- itsryanarmani/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pooriaarab/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- AgriciDaniel/claude-adstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- hackjpn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- chriswestt/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ads-apple, ads-amazon and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
chriswesttSkillads-apple
Apple Ads (formerly Apple Search Ads) deep analysis for mobile app advertisers. Evaluates campaign structure, bid health, Custom Product Pages (CPPs), MMP attribution, budget pacing, TAP coverage (Today/Search/Product Pages), Maximize Conversions bidding, and goal CPA benchmarks by country. Use when user says Apple Ads, Apple Search Ads, ASA, App Store ads, Apple ads, Search Ads, or is advertising a mobile app on iOS.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AgriciDanielSkillads-amazon
Audit Amazon Ads profiles, regions, Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, Sponsored Display, DSP, portfolios, targeting, search terms, retail readiness, creative, budgets, ACOS, TACOS, reporting, and policy. Use for Amazon Ads, sponsored ads, Amazon PPC, ACOS, TACOS, ASIN advertising, Amazon DSP, or retail-media optimization.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AgriciDanielSkillads-reddit
Audit Reddit Ads measurement, campaign structure, community and interest targeting, creative-native fit, catalog advertising, budgets, brand safety, and reporting. Use for Reddit Ads, conversation ads, community targeting, Reddit Pixel, Reddit Conversions API, or Reddit dynamic product ads.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillgsap
GSAP animation reference for HyperFrames. Covers gsap.to(), from(), fromTo(), easing, stagger, defaults, timelines (gsap.timeline(), position parameter, labels, nesting, playback), and performance (transforms, will-change, quickTo). Use when writing GSAP animations in HyperFrames compositions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillhyperframes-cli
HyperFrames CLI tool — hyperframes init, lint, inspect, preview, render, transcribe, tts, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, compositions, docs, benchmark. Use when scaffolding a project, linting, validating, inspecting visual layout in compositions, previewing in the studio, rendering to video, transcribing audio, generating TTS, or troubleshooting the HyperFrames environment.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from AgriciDaniel
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 8
- coopersimson96/ai-content-system★ 1761% same
- megastep/codex-skills★ 484% same
- Maxymize/maxym-ai-ads★ 291% same
- get-proofpilot/claude-skills-catalog★ 184% same
- Biznomad/claude-skills★ 066% same
- chriswestt/claude-skills★ 091% same
- hackjpn/claude-skills★ 084% same
- oivanfelipe/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- AgriciDaniel/claude-ads★ 10ksame name
- giovani-junior-dev/trafego-pack★ 1same name
- itsryanarmani/skills★ 1same name
- pooriaarab/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adsSkill
- ads-auditSkill
- ads-budgetSkill
- ads-competitorSkill
- ads-concienciaSkill
- ads-createSkill
- ads-creativeSkill
- ads-dnaSkill
- ads-generateSkill
- ads-googleSkill
- ads-landingSkill
- ads-mathSkill
- ads-nextSkill
- ads-photoshootSkill
- ads-planSkill
- ads-publishSkill
- ads-startSkill
- ads-testSkill
- ads-tiktokSkill
- ads-updateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 3 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 43
All standard events configured (ViewContent, AddToCart, Purchase, Lead)
- Common: line 82
If Advantage+ features are in use:
- Common: line 91
If ads are in restricted categories:
- Very specific: line 95
Read ads/references/compliance.md for full requirements
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Portions Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) - see LICENSE for original authors · tododeia.com · id er-fd4fa55b -->Meta Ads Deep Analysis
Andromeda AI Engine
Meta's Andromeda AI engine (Oct 2025) filters ads using 10,000x more complex models. Creative diversity is now the #1 performance lever. Ads with Similarity Score >60% get retrieval suppression. The algorithm clusters near-identical creatives and limits their delivery. 100 minor variations perform no better than 10. Prioritize genuinely distinct concepts, angles, and formats over volume of similar variants.
Data Collection (3-tier free-first)
- Capa 1 — MCP (preferred when available): if the user supplies an
ad_account_id(formatact_<digits>) and the claude.ai Facebook MCP is connected, call the Meta MCP tools listed inads/references/mcp-meta-integration.md. Most M01-M40 checks become live data lookups.mcp__claude_ai_Facebook__ads_get_dataset_quality→ M02-M04 (EMQ, CAPI, dedup)mcp__claude_ai_Facebook__ads_get_ad_entities→ M11-M40 (structure, learning phase, placements)mcp__claude_ai_Facebook__ads_catalog_get_diagnostics→ Advantage+ Shopping healthmcp__claude_ai_Facebook__ads_insights_performance_trend→ M28 (creative fatigue)mcp__claude_ai_Facebook__ads_insights_industry_benchmark→ live benchmarks (overridebenchmarks.mdwhen present)
- Capa 2 — Direct API (also free; OAuth setup once): if a
meta-data.jsonfile is present in the cwd, read it as the data source. The user generates it ahead of audit time with:
Full setup inexport META_ACCESS_TOKEN='...' python3 scripts/api/meta_fetch.py --account-id act_<id> -o meta-data.jsonscripts/api/README.md. Setdata_source: "direct_api"in the JSON output. - Capa 3 — Manual fallback (always works, no setup): Ads Manager CSV export + Events Manager screenshot + EMQ scores. Mark unevaluable checks
"result": "N/A"in the JSON output.
Then follow the standard 7-step audit process in ads/references/audit-methodology.md using meta-audit.md as the check list. Emit dual output (meta-audit-results.json against audit-output-schema.json, plus meta-audit-results.md).
What to Analyze
Pixel / CAPI Health (30% weight)
- Meta Pixel installed and firing on all pages
- Conversions API (CAPI) active (30-40% data loss without it post-iOS 14.5)
- Event deduplication configured (event_id matching, ≥90% dedup rate)
- Event Match Quality (EMQ) ≥8.0 for Purchase event
- All standard events configured (ViewContent, AddToCart, Purchase, Lead)
- Custom conversions created for non-standard events
- Aggregated Event Measurement (AEM) configured for iOS
- Domain verification completed
- Server-side events include customer_information parameters
- Pixel fires with correct currency and value parameters
Creative (30% weight)
- ≥3 creative formats active (image, video, carousel, collection)
- ≥5 creatives per ad set (Meta recommendation)
- Creative fatigue detection: CTR drop >20% over 14 days = FAIL
- Video creative: 15s max for Stories/Reels, 30s max for Feed
- UGC/testimonial creative tested
- Dynamic Creative Optimization (DCO) tested
- Ad copy: headline under 40 chars, primary text under 125 chars
- Creative refresh cadence: every 2-4 weeks for high-spend
Account Structure (20% weight)
- Campaign Budget Optimization (CBO) vs Ad Set Budget (ABO) intentional
- Campaign consolidation: 1-3 campaigns total recommended
- Learning phase health: <30% ad sets in "Learning Limited" (FAIL >50%)
- Budget per ad set: ≥5x target CPA (minimum for learning phase exit)
- Ad set audience overlap <30% (Audience Overlap tool)
- Campaign naming conventions consistent and descriptive
- Advantage+ Sales Campaigns active for e-commerce
- Simplified campaign structure: 1-3 campaigns total (fewer, larger ad sets preferred)
Audience & Targeting (20% weight)
- Prospecting frequency (7-day): <3.0 (WARNING 3-5, FAIL >5)
- Retargeting frequency (7-day): <8.0 (WARNING 8-12, FAIL >12)
- Custom Audiences: website visitors, customer lists, engagement
- Lookalike Audiences: multiple seed sizes tested (1%, 3%, 5%)
- Advantage+ Audience tested vs manual targeting
- Interest targeting: broad enough for algorithm optimization
- Exclusions: purchasers excluded from prospecting, overlap managed
- Location targeting reviewed for relevance
Advantage+ Assessment
If Advantage+ features are in use:
- Advantage+ Sales Campaigns: catalog connected, existing customer cap set
- Advantage+ Audience: performance vs manual audience compared
- Advantage+ Creative: enhancements enabled (text, brightness, music)
- Advantage+ Placements: enabled (let Meta optimize placement mix)
- Budget allocation: Advantage+ campaigns getting fair test budget
Special Ad Categories
If ads are in restricted categories:
- Special Ad Category declared before campaign creation
- Targeting restrictions verified (no ZIP, age 18-65+ only, no Lookalike)
- Creative compliance with category-specific policies
- Read
ads/references/compliance.mdfor full requirements
EMQ Optimization Guide
| EMQ Score | Status | Action |
| 8.0-10.0 | Excellent | Maintain current setup |
| 6.0-7.9 | Good | Add more customer_information parameters |
| 4.0-5.9 | Fair | Implement CAPI, improve data quality |
| <4.0 | Poor | Critical: CAPI + Enhanced Matching required |
Key parameters to maximize EMQ:
em(email): highest match rate signalph(phone): second highest match signalfn,ln(first/last name): improves match accuracyct,st,zp(city, state, zip): geographic matchingexternal_id: CRM/user ID for cross-device matching
Key Thresholds
| Metric | Pass | Warning | Fail |
| EMQ (Purchase) | ≥8.0 | 6.0-7.9 | <6.0 |
| Dedup rate | ≥90% | 70-90% | <70% |
| CTR | ≥1.0% | 0.5-1.0% | <0.5% |
| Creative formats | ≥3 | 2 | 1 |
| Creatives per ad set | ≥5 | 3-4 | <3 |
| Learning Limited | <30% | 30-50% | >50% |
| Budget per ad set | ≥5x CPA | 2-5x CPA | <2x CPA |
Output
Meta Ads Health Score
Meta Ads Health Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)
Pixel / CAPI Health: XX/100 ████████░░ (30%)
Creative: XX/100 ██████████ (30%)
Account Structure: XX/100 ███████░░░ (20%)
Audience: XX/100 █████░░░░░ (20%)Deliverables
META-ADS-REPORT.md: Full 50-check findings with pass/warning/fail- EMQ improvement roadmap
- Creative fatigue alerts (any creative with CTR declining >20%)
- Quick Wins sorted by impact
- Advantage+ adoption recommendations
Threads Placement
Threads placement GA Jan 2026, 400M+ MAU. Lower CPMs than Feed/Stories. Currently ~0.04% of total spend. Emerging channel. Evaluate:
- Is Threads placement enabled in Advantage+ Placements?
- Monitor CPM and engagement vs other placements
- Early-mover advantage for brands with active Threads presence
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

