agentleFS
GustavoGutierrezGustavoGutierrez/engineering-skills/skills/prd-writer/SKILL.md

prd-writer

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

35 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use experiment-designer, user-research and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Dokkabei97Skill

    experiment-designer

    Designs A/B tests and product experiments with hypothesis structuring, sample size calculation, duration estimation, and result interpretation. Unified framework for both product and marketing experiments.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    user-research

    Plan, conduct, and synthesize user research. Trigger with "user research plan", "interview guide", "usability test", "survey design", "research questions", or when the user needs help with any aspect of understanding their users through research.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    brainstorming

    You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps.

    line 40
  3. Distinctive:

    Use concrete, measurable criteria.

    line 65
  4. Distinctive:

    Skip Discovery: Never write a PRD without asking at least 2 clarifying questions first.

    line 124
  5. Very specific:

    Hallucinate Constraints: If the user didn't specify a tech stack, ask or label it as TBD.

    line 125
  6. Distinctive:

    Benchmark: Test with 50 common domain questions.

    line 153

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Product Requirements Document (PRD)

Overview

Design comprehensive, production-grade Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) that bridge the gap between business vision and technical execution. This skill works for modern software systems, ensuring that requirements are clearly defined.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new product or feature development cycle
  • Translating a vague idea into a concrete technical specification
  • Defining requirements for AI-powered features
  • Stakeholders need a unified "source of truth" for project scope
  • User asks to "write a PRD", "document requirements", or "plan a feature"

Operational Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery (The Interview)

Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps. Do not assume context.

Ask about:

  • The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?
  • Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?
  • Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?

Phase 2: Analysis & Scoping

Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.

  • Map out the User Flow.
  • Define Non-Goals to protect the timeline.

Phase 3: Technical Drafting

Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.


PRD Quality Standards

Requirements Quality

Use concrete, measurable criteria. Avoid "fast", "easy", or "intuitive".

# Vague (BAD)
- The search should be fast and return relevant results.
- The UI must look modern and be easy to use.

# Concrete (GOOD)
+ The search must return results within 200ms for a 10k record dataset.
+ The search algorithm must achieve >= 85% Precision@10 in benchmark evals.
+ The UI must follow the project's design system and achieve 100% Lighthouse Accessibility score.

Strict PRD Schema

You MUST follow this exact structure for the output:

1. Executive Summary

  • Problem Statement: 1-2 sentences on the pain point.
  • Proposed Solution: 1-2 sentences on the fix.
  • Success Criteria: 3-5 measurable KPIs.

2. User Experience & Functionality

  • User Personas: Who is this for?
  • User Stories: As a [user], I want to [action] so that [benefit].
  • Acceptance Criteria: Bulleted list of "Done" definitions for each story.
  • Non-Goals: What are we NOT building?

3. AI System Requirements (If Applicable)

  • Tool Requirements: What tools and APIs are needed?
  • Evaluation Strategy: How to measure output quality and accuracy.

4. Technical Specifications

  • Architecture Overview: Data flow and component interaction.
  • Integration Points: APIs, DBs, and Auth.
  • Security & Privacy: Data handling and compliance.

5. Risks & Roadmap

  • Phased Rollout: MVP -> v1.1 -> v2.0.
  • Technical Risks: Latency, cost, or dependency failures.

Implementation Guidelines

DO (Always)

  • Define Testing: For AI systems, specify how to test and validate output quality.
  • Iterate: Present a draft and ask for feedback on specific sections.

DON'T (Avoid)

  • Skip Discovery: Never write a PRD without asking at least 2 clarifying questions first.
  • Hallucinate Constraints: If the user didn't specify a tech stack, ask or label it as TBD.

Example: Domain Retrieval Feature

1. Executive Summary

Problem: Users struggle to find specific information across large domain knowledge sources. Solution: A retrieval feature that provides direct answers with source citations. Success:

  • Reduce search time by 50%.
  • Citation accuracy >= 95%.

2. User Stories

  • Story: As a domain user, I want to ask natural language questions so I don't have to guess exact keywords.
  • AC:
    • Supports multi-turn clarification.
    • Returns code blocks with "Copy" button.

3. System Architecture

  • Capabilities Required: content indexing, query parsing, source retrieval, and citation rendering.

4. Evaluation

  • Benchmark: Test with 50 common domain questions.
  • Pass Rate: 90% must match expected citations.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.