agentleFS
GusevV1987GusevV1987/ai-workspace-kit/skills/retro/SKILL.md

retro

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Weekly or on-demand retrospective from git history and session logs. Analyzes what got done, work patterns, quality trends, and improvement areas.

193 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use plan-tune, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    pair-agent

    Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Saqlain-811
  • +2 more from ShreyRavi

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Look at what actually happened, not what you remember happening.

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    When you feel busy but aren't sure if you're making progress

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Before planning the next phase of work

    line 20
  4. Very specific:

    Write the retro to memory/retro-YYYY-MM-DD.md for future reference.

    line 92

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Retro

The Rule

Look at what actually happened, not what you remember happening.

When to Use

  • Weekly review ("what did we accomplish this week?")
  • End of a sprint or milestone
  • When you feel busy but aren't sure if you're making progress
  • Before planning the next phase of work

How It Works

Step 1: Gather the Data

Pull from three sources:

Git history (if available):

  • Commits in the time window
  • Files changed, lines added/removed
  • Patterns (which areas of the codebase got the most attention)

Session logs (from memory/ daily logs):

  • Sessions completed
  • Major decisions made
  • Gotchas encountered
  • Skills invoked

Step 2: Categorize the Work

Group everything into:

CategoryWhat counts
BuildingNew features, new skills, new infrastructure
FixingBug fixes, incident response, regression fixes
MaintainingUpdates, dependency bumps, config changes, cleanup
PlanningArchitecture decisions, PRDs, research sessions
LearningNew skills created, gotchas documented, process improvements

Step 3: Identify Patterns

Look for:

  • Time sinks — areas that consumed disproportionate effort
  • Repeat offenders — the same type of problem appearing multiple times
  • Unplanned work — how much of the week was reactive vs. planned
  • Momentum — which projects moved forward vs. stalled

Step 4: Produce the Report

## Retro: [Date Range]

### What Got Done
- [Bullet summary of shipped/completed work]

### Time Distribution
| Category | Approximate % |
|----------|--------------|
| Building | XX% |
| Fixing | XX% |
| Maintaining | XX% |
| Planning | XX% |
| Learning | XX% |

### Patterns
- [Observation about work patterns]
- [Recurring issues]

### What Went Well
- [Specific things that worked]

### What Could Improve
- [Specific, actionable improvements]

### Next Week Focus
- [Top 1-3 priorities based on the retro]

Step 5: Save

Write the retro to memory/retro-YYYY-MM-DD.md for future reference.

Key Principle

Retros are about patterns, not blame. The goal is to spot systemic issues and adjust — not to judge individual sessions.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.