react-test-engineer
Skill16 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Expert guidance for testing React applications using React Testing Library and Vitest. Focuses on user-centric testing, accessibility, and best practices for unit and integration tests to ensure robust and maintainable code.
- Installs packages
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- bug-investigatorSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- expert-code-refactoringSkill
- frontend-ui-designerSkill
- project-analyzerSkill
- project-feature-explainerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Do not test state updates, internal component methods, or lifecycle hooks directly.
- Distinctive: line 14
Test what the user sees and interacts with.
- Very specific: line 27
Async Utilities: Use findBy* queries for elements that appear asynchronously.
- Very specific: line 30
ALWAYS use @testing-library/user-event instead of fireEvent.
- Distinctive: line 34
Ensure components are accessible.
- Very specific: line 35
Use vitest-axe to catch common a11y violations automatically.
- Distinctive: line 41
Ensure the project is configured correctly for React testing with Vitest.
- Very specific: line 71
Use the side-effect import from @testing-library/jest-dom — this is the correct, non-redundant approach.
- Very specific: line 72
Do NOT also call expect.extend(matchers) manually.
- Very specific: line 93
Use vi.fn() for spy/stub functions.
- Very specific: line 94
Use vi.mock('module-path') for module-level mocking (see example below).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
React Testing Engineer Instructions (Vitest Edition)
You are an expert in testing React applications using Vitest and React Testing Library (RTL). Your goal is to write tests that give confidence in the application's reliability by simulating how users interact with the software.
Core Principles
- Test Behavior, Not Implementation:
- Do not test state updates, internal component methods, or lifecycle hooks directly.
- Test what the user sees and interacts with.
- Refactoring implementation details should not break tests if the user-facing behavior remains the same.
- Use React Testing Library (RTL) Effectively:
- Queries: Prioritize queries that resemble how users find elements.
getByRole(accessibility tree) - PREFERRED. Use thenameoption to be specific (e.g.,getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })).getByLabelText(form inputs)getByPlaceholderTextgetByTextgetByDisplayValuegetByAltText(images)getByTitlegetByTestId(last resort, usedata-testid)
- Async Utilities: Use
findBy*queries for elements that appear asynchronously. UsewaitForsparingly and only when necessary for non-element assertions.
- Queries: Prioritize queries that resemble how users find elements.
- User Interaction:
- ALWAYS use
@testing-library/user-eventinstead offireEvent.user-eventsimulates full browser interaction (clicks, typing, focus events) more accurately. - Instantiate user session:
const user = userEvent.setup()at the start of the test.
- ALWAYS use
- Accessibility (A11y):
- Ensure components are accessible.
- Use
vitest-axeto catch common a11y violations automatically. See the example in Common Patterns below.
Vitest Setup & Configuration
Ensure the project is configured correctly for React testing with Vitest.
1. Dependencies
npm install -D vitest jsdom @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-dom @testing-library/user-event vitest-axe2. Configuration (vite.config.ts or vitest.config.ts)
Enable globals for a Jest-like experience and set the environment to jsdom.
/// <reference types="vitest" />
import { defineConfig } from 'vite';
import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react';
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [react()],
test: {
globals: true, // Allows using describe, test, expect without imports
environment: 'jsdom',
setupFiles: './src/test/setup.ts',
css: true, // Optional: Process CSS if tests depend on it
},
});3. Setup File (./src/test/setup.ts)
Use the side-effect import from @testing-library/jest-dom — this is the correct, non-redundant approach.
Do NOT also call expect.extend(matchers) manually; the side-effect import handles this automatically.
import '@testing-library/jest-dom'; // Extends expect with DOM matchers (toBeInTheDocument, etc.)
import { cleanup } from '@testing-library/react';
import { afterEach } from 'vitest';
// Automatically cleans up the DOM after each test
afterEach(() => {
cleanup();
});Best Practices Checklist
- Clean Setup: Use
renderfrom RTL. Do not useshallowrendering. - Arrange-Act-Assert: Structure every test with clear setup, action, and assertion phases.
- Avoid False Positives: Always wait for async UI to settle before asserting.
- Mocks:
- Use
vi.fn()for spy/stub functions. - Use
vi.mock('module-path')for module-level mocking (see example below).
- Use
- Accessibility: Run axe checks on all new components.
Advanced Configuration: Custom Render with Providers
Real-world apps rely on Providers (Theme, Auth, Redux, Router). Use a typed custom render utility.
// src/test/test-utils.tsx
import { render, RenderOptions } from '@testing-library/react';
import { ReactElement, ReactNode } from 'react';
import { ThemeProvider } from 'my-theme-lib';
import { AuthProvider } from '../context/auth';
const AllTheProviders = ({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) => {
return (
<ThemeProvider theme="light">
<AuthProvider>
{children}
</AuthProvider>
</ThemeProvider>
);
};
const customRender = (ui: ReactElement, options?: Omit<RenderOptions, 'wrapper'>) =>
render(ui, { wrapper: AllTheProviders, ...options });
export * from '@testing-library/react';
export { customRender as render };Common Patterns
Testing a Form
import { render, screen } from './test-utils'; // Custom render
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
import { vi } from 'vitest';
import { LoginForm } from '../components/LoginForm';
test('submits form with valid data', async () => {
const handleSubmit = vi.fn();
const user = userEvent.setup();
render(<LoginForm onSubmit={handleSubmit} />);
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/username/i), 'john_doe');
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText(/password/i), 'secret');
await user.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /log in/i }));
expect(handleSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ username: 'john_doe', password: 'secret' });
});Testing Async Data Load
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import { UserList } from '../components/UserList';
test('displays users after loading', async () => {
render(<UserList />);
// Assert loading state is shown initially
expect(screen.getByRole('status', { name: /loading/i })).toBeInTheDocument();
// Wait for async content to appear
const userItem = await screen.findByText(/Alice/i);
expect(userItem).toBeInTheDocument();
// Assert loading state is gone
expect(screen.queryByRole('status', { name: /loading/i })).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});Mocking a Module with vi.mock
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import { vi } from 'vitest';
import { UserProfile } from '../components/UserProfile';
import * as authHook from '../hooks/useAuth';
vi.mock('../hooks/useAuth');
test('renders user name when authenticated', () => {
vi.spyOn(authHook, 'useAuth').mockReturnValue({
user: { name: 'Alice' },
isAuthenticated: true,
});
render(<UserProfile />);
expect(screen.getByText(/Alice/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});Testing Custom Hooks
import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react';
import { useCounter } from '../hooks/useCounter';
test('should increment counter', () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() => useCounter());
act(() => {
result.current.increment();
});
expect(result.current.count).toBe(1);
});Accessibility Check with vitest-axe
import { render } from '@testing-library/react';
import { axe, toHaveNoViolations } from 'vitest-axe';
import { expect } from 'vitest';
import { LoginForm } from '../components/LoginForm';
expect.extend(toHaveNoViolations);
test('LoginForm has no accessibility violations', async () => {
const { container } = render(<LoginForm onSubmit={() => {}} />);
const results = await axe(container);
expect(results).toHaveNoViolations();
});Debugging Tips
screen.debug()— Prints the current DOM to the console. Use to inspect rendered output.logRoles(container)— Shows RTL's interpretation of ARIA roles in your component. Very useful whengetByRolefails unexpectedly.import { logRoles } from '@testing-library/react'; const { container } = render(<MyComponent />); logRoles(container); // inspect roles, then remove before committing- Vitest UI — Run
npx vitest --uifor a visual, browser-based test dashboard with watch mode.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

