openspec-apply-change
Skill968 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
147 other projects use a version of this, 140 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ValorVie/custom-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- full-stack-skills/electron-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- halo-dev/plugin-ai-foundationedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ptonlix/OneSelfedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- FuDesign2008/open-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- feimacode/open-design-agent-kitedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use openspec-update-change, openspec-verify-change and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Microsoft AzureSkillopenspec-update-change
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
Also in 89 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Also in 75 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-continue-change
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Also in 62 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-ff-change
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
Also in 58 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
Also in 55 projects that use this
goernSkilldraft-openspec-docs
Collaborative page-drafting mode for the OpenSpec docs. Builds a scratch plan inside the target page (purpose, structure, numbered draft steps), iterates on it with the user, then drafts one section per approved step and cleans up after itself. Use when a page needs a from-scratch rewrite or a new page is being shaped with the user in the loop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from microsoft
- +1 more from elastic
Other versions147 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- FuDesign2008/open-skills★ 6100% same
Edited · 140
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k32% same
- halo-dev/halo★ 40k83% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k97% same
- databasus/databasus★ 9.3k45% same
- RostislavDugin/postgresus★ 9.3k45% same
- fonoster/fonoster★ 8.2k89% same
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.2k99% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.4k95% same
- KunAgent/Kun★ 6.4k99% same
- XingYu-Zhong/DeepSeek-GUI★ 6.4k99% same
130 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 6
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.3ksame name
- henhen6/mdp★ 133same name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- beautifulSoup/speccoding-template★ 62same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 20same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- source-command-opsx-applySkill
- source-command-opsx-archiveSkill
- source-command-opsx-exploreSkill
- source-command-opsx-proposeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- gtrk-ai-dramaSkill
- gtrk-compositeSkill
- gtrk-coverSkill
- gtrk-food-recapSkill
- gtrk-live-slicingSkill
- gtrk-long2shortSkill
- gtrk-matrixSkill
- gtrk-mgSkill
- gtrk-music-visualizerSkill
- gtrk-narrationSkill
- gtrk-oralcutSkill
- gtrk-ref-readingSkill
- gtrk-splitterSkill
- gtrk-style-makerSkill
- gtrk-talking-headSkill
- gtrk-toolsSkill
- gtrk-transcriptSkill
- gtrk-travel-recapSkill
- gtrk-vlog-docuSkill
- gtrk-voiceoverSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 13 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
13
Common
Most of the 142 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 21
If a name is provided, use it.
- Very specific: line 24
If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
- Very specific: line 26
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).
- Very specific: line 49
If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change
- Very specific: line 50
If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
- Very specific: line 55
Read every file path listed under contextFiles from the apply instructions output.
- Common: line 73
Keep changes minimal and focused
- Common: line 88
If all done: suggest archive
- Common: line 89
If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
- Common: line 143
Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Common: line 144
Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- Common: line 145
If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- Common: line 146
If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Common: line 147
Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Common: line 148
Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Common: line 150
Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Common: line 156
Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Common: line 157
Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 142 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change:
<name>" and how to override (e.g.,/opsx:apply <other>).- Check status to understand the schema
Parse the JSON to understand:openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonschemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --jsonThis returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked"(missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change - If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Read context files
Read every file path listed under
contextFilesfrom the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ]→- [x] - Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task completeOutput On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
Fluid Workflow Integration
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

