agentleFS
Sign inStart free
GerardoRdz96GerardoRdz96/claude-skills/skills/eval/SKILL.md

eval

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use to score a code diff against Servy's audited code-review rubric (PReMISE-style, judge = Codex). Triggers - "eval this diff", "score this code", "rubric-score", "/eval score". Phase 1 = score mode; audit/repair/discover land in later phases.

41 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use docs-ci, docs-interfaces and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • jh941213Skill

    docs-ci

    문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • jh941213Skill

    docs-interfaces

    API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • open-coder-aiSkill

    policy-init

    Create conformant Chock policy from request. args(request, target_path,

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-import

    Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • diego-tobalinaSkill

    build-fix

    Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +4 more from jh941213

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 32 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read back the scorecard: per-dimension scores + weighted total + normalized %.

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    If scoring Servy's own just-written code, this satisfies the No-Self-Review step of the /build doctrine — the judge is Codex, a different …

    line 19

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 32 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/eval

Rubric-judge eval for Servy. Phase 1 ships score mode: judge a diff against references/rubrics/code-review.json using Codex (No-Self-Review Law — never Claude reviewing Claude's own code).

score

  1. Get the diff to score (a file path, or git diff piped in).
  2. Run: git diff | python3 scripts/eval_judge.py score --diff - --rubric references/rubrics/code-review.json (add --json for machine output).
  3. Read back the scorecard: per-dimension scores + weighted total + normalized %.
  4. If scoring Servy's own just-written code, this satisfies the No-Self-Review step of the /build doctrine — the judge is Codex, a different lineage.

The deterministic scoring logic is covered by tests/eval/test_eval_judge.py (stdlib unittest — python3 tests/eval/test_eval_judge.py). The only model call is the Codex judge.

Audit / repair / discover modes (PReMISE rubric auditing) are Phase 2-4. Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-01-rubric-judge-eval-design.md. Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-01-rubric-judge-eval-p1.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free