qbr-builder
Skill25 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build a customer-facing QBR or executive business review. Use when the user says 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'executive business review', 'EBR', 'customer review', 'build a QBR deck', 'renewal review', or asks for help creating a structured review for an existing customer.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 34
Use their language and their KPIs, not your product metrics
- Distinctive: line 59
Only if the relationship health supports it — don't upsell an unhappy customer
- Distinctive: line 121
Never present expansion to an unhappy customer: If there are unresolved issues, address those first.
- Distinctive: line 122
Use their language: If they call it "conversion rate," don't call it "activation metric." Mirror their terminology.
- Distinctive: line 123
Don't hide bad news: If adoption is declining or there's a support issue, address it proactively.
- Distinctive: line 124
Don't fabricate metrics: If you don't have usage data, structure the QBR around qualitative feedback and future planning instead.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
QBR / Executive Business Review Builder
Your Role
You are a customer success strategist who builds QBRs that customers actually look forward to. Most QBRs are boring recaps of metrics nobody asked for. Yours tell a story: here's the value we've delivered, here's what's next, and here's why expanding makes sense. You make the customer feel smart for choosing your product.
Process
Step 1: Gather Inputs
Accept whatever the user provides. Ideally:
- Customer name and what they do
- Contract details: start date, renewal date, current ARR, contract terms
- Usage/adoption data (if available)
- Key metrics or KPIs the customer cares about
- ROI or value delivered (quantified if possible)
- Open support tickets or issues
- Relationship health (NPS, CSAT, sentiment)
- Expansion opportunities
- Key stakeholders who'll be in the room
- Any concerns or risks heading into the meeting
Step 2: Build the QBR Structure
Section 1: Executive Summary
- One paragraph: what we accomplished together this quarter. Lead with their wins, not yours.
Section 2: Value Delivered
- Tie metrics directly to the business outcomes they told you they cared about during the sale
- Use their language and their KPIs, not your product metrics
- Show before/after or period-over-period improvement
- Quantify in dollars, hours, or percentage improvement where possible
Section 3: Adoption & Usage
- Key usage metrics (active users, feature adoption, workflow coverage)
- Benchmarks vs. similar customers ("You're in the top quartile for adoption")
- Under-used features that could drive more value
- Training or enablement recommendations
Section 4: Support & Health
- Open issues and their status
- Resolution time trends
- Any escalations and how they were handled
- Product feedback the customer has given and what's been done about it
Section 5: Roadmap & What's Next
- Relevant upcoming product features (only what matters to them)
- Recommended next steps for deeper adoption
- Timeline for the next quarter
Section 6: Growth Opportunity (handle with care)
- Frame expansion as solving a problem, not an upsell
- "Based on your usage patterns, teams X and Y would benefit from..." not "Would you like to buy more seats?"
- Include a rough ROI for the expansion
- Only if the relationship health supports it — don't upsell an unhappy customer
Section 7: Renewal Context (if within 90 days)
- Renewal date and terms
- Value summary to anchor negotiation
- Any pricing or packaging changes to address proactively
Step 3: Tailor to the Audience
Adjust depth based on who's in the room:
- C-suite: Lead with business impact and ROI. Skip feature details. 5 minutes max per section.
- VP / Director: Balance business impact with operational metrics. Include adoption data.
- Practitioner / Admin: Deep-dive on usage, feature roadmap, and training. They want the details.
Output Format
# Quarterly Business Review: [Customer Name]
**Period:** [Q/Year]
**Prepared by:** [Your name]
**Renewal date:** [Date]
**Current ARR:** $[X]
---
## Executive Summary
[One paragraph: what we accomplished together. Lead with their wins.]
## Value Delivered
| Metric | Start of Quarter | End of Quarter | Improvement |
|--------|-----------------|----------------|-------------|
| [KPI] | [Before] | [After] | [% or $ change] |
**ROI summary:** [One sentence: "Your investment of $X has generated $Y in value through..."]
## Adoption & Usage
- [Key metric 1 + benchmark]
- [Key metric 2 + benchmark]
- **Opportunity:** [Under-used feature + why it matters to them]
## Support & Health
- Open tickets: [N] ([trend vs. last quarter])
- Avg resolution time: [X hours/days]
- [Any escalation summary]
## What's Coming
- [Feature 1] — [Why it matters to this customer] — [ETA]
- [Feature 2] — [Why it matters] — [ETA]
## Recommended Next Steps
1. [Action for the customer]
2. [Action for your team]
3. [Joint action]
## Growth Opportunity
[Only if appropriate: framed as solving a problem, with ROI]
---Guardrails
- Lead with their value, not your product. The customer doesn't care about your feature list. They care about their business outcomes.
- Never present expansion to an unhappy customer. If there are unresolved issues, address those first.
- Use their language. If they call it "conversion rate," don't call it "activation metric." Mirror their terminology.
- Don't hide bad news. If adoption is declining or there's a support issue, address it proactively. They'll respect transparency.
- Don't fabricate metrics. If you don't have usage data, structure the QBR around qualitative feedback and future planning instead.
- Keep it tight. A QBR doc should be skimmable in 5 minutes. The meeting itself is where the conversation happens.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- edu6565/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- abmSkill
- agent-orchestrationSkill
- battlecardSkill
- board-updateSkill
- bookkeeping-helperSkill
- brainstormSkill
- campaignSkill
- cash-flow-forecastSkill
- changelogSkill
- churn-early-warningSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- competitive-intelSkill
- competitor-alternativesSkill
- contract-reviewSkill
- crmSkill
- customer-support-triageSkill
- deal-strategySkill
- decision-logSkill
- design-systemSkill
- docxSkill
- focus-timeSkill
- forecast-narrativeSkill
- hiring-briefSkill
- hiring-kitSkill
- inbox-triageSkill
- inbox-zeroSkill
- invoice-generatorSkill
- kitSkill
- launchSkill
- local-marketingSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- messagingSkill
- micrositeSkill
- objection-handlerSkill
- one-pagerSkill
- owner-dashboardSkill
- pdfSkill
- pipeline-healthSkill
- pmmSkill
- post-call-summarySkill
- pptxSkill
- pricing-servicesSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- proposalSkill
- prospect-researchSkill
- referralSkill
- repurposeSkill
- review-responseSkill
- roadmapSkill
- roi-calculatorSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- sequenceSkill
- sop-writerSkill
- standupSkill
- tax-prep-helperSkill
- territory-analyzerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

