agentleFS
FreddyPolyFreddyPoly/claude-skills/polish/SKILL.md

polish

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Refine one already-built, already-qc-passed aspect of a project at a time — visual/UX details, layout, positioning, fonts, icons, animation timing, interaction feel, swapping in a finished art asset, or kicking off production of a not-yet-made one (pinning down format/dimensions/file paths/generation pipeline, then handing off to doc-to-issues for a per-variant owner:user + owner:agent issue split) — through the same relentless, multi-round interview style as the `interview` skill, but scoped to a single named aspect instead of a whole new feature. Always launches the running app first (via the `run` skill and any debug/fast-forward tools the project has) and looks at its live current state before asking anything, since visual/UX/feel decisions can't be judged from code alone. Stops at a numbered "Shared Understanding" summary and waits for explicit approval before writing anything. Once approved, updates the relevant existing SPEC.md section in place with the validated decision — no new section, no separate changelog file — then stops and points to `doc-to-issues` to sync the concrete issue; its existing rerun logic already reopens the affected done issue and flips that feature back to not-ready, so this skill never touches issues/INDEX.md or issues/FEATURES.md itself. Refuses a target that isn't an already-built, already-qc-passed aspect and redirects to `interview` instead — this skill is for refining what exists, not designing something new, and stays out of raw numeric/balance tuning (costs, growth rates, thresholds), which belongs to a separate deferred pass. Use whenever the user wants to polish, refine, nail down visual/UX/asset details for, or tune the feel of a specific already-built part of a project — "make the kill counter feel right," "let's polish the login button," "the queueing feels weird, can we fix that" — or invokes /polish explicitly. Requires an existing SPEC.md and issues/ (from doc-to-issues) — if neither exists, point to doc-to-issues (or interview first) instead.

70 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use layout, shape and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • owshq-mecSkill

    layout

    Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • HAR5HA-7663Skill

    shape

    Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.

    Also in 13 projects that use this

  • PeterCangSkill

    tokens

    Count all historical Claude Code token usage across all local projects, broken down by model, project, date, and week. Includes cost estimation based on official Anthropic pricing.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • arjunkshahSkill

    redesign

    Redesign existing interfaces to premium quality while preserving product goals and functional behavior.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • leonaaardobSkill

    motion

    Complete Motion.dev documentation - modern animation library for React, JavaScript, and Vue (formerly Framer Motion)

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    review-loop

    Iterative review loop using any lens agent against any target (plan, code, design). Use when you want to run a focused review cycle: spawn a fresh reviewer subagent with a specific lens, present findings and remediation to the user, apply fixes with user guidance, and repeat until clean.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 62 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 62 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.