use-testing
Skill61 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build process. How work is PROVEN here — before you say «done», «it works», «ready to check». Load it when you are about to report a result, when a gate goes green and you feel finished, when something must be verified on the node, and when the owner asks for proof («show me the proof», «докажи»). The rule that changes behaviour: two proofs from DIFFERENT planes, one of them with a negative control, and a build log is never one of them — it reads the same whether the capability works or not.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Fractera/Agentic-Engineering-Infrastructureword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Fractera/Agentic-Engineering-Infrastructure★ 61100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository88 other files it gives its agents.
- app/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adopt-suggested-skillSkill
- ai-elementsSkill
- ai-sdkSkill
- answer-elementSkill
- ask-elementSkill
- audit-broken-charactersSkill
- blocks-of-the-nodeSkill
- build-product-with-ownerSkill
- content-factorySkill
- core-build-returnSkill
- core-scheduleSkill
- create-elementSkill
- create-multilingual-content-entrySkill
- design-and-settings-of-elementsSkill
- element-powerSkill
- expand-site-languageSkill
- explain-this-projectSkill
- extract-design-systemSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- handle-block-requestSkill
- handle-needSkill
- help-in-browserSkill
- humanizerSkill
- integratorSkill
- know-the-architectSkill
- manage-app-settingsSkill
- node-typeSkill
- own-agentsSkill
- persist-env-var-with-rebuildSkill
- place-page-in-menuSkill
- provider-rulesSkill
- release-templateSkill
- review-pageSkill
- route-to-elementSkill
- self-reviewSkill
- shadcnSkill
- shape-the-needSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- study-for-elementSkill
- supervise-elementSkill
- translate-pendingSkill
- ultracode-sessionSkill
- use-agentic-ragSkill
- use-ai-generationSkill
- use-aioSkill
- use-app-configSkill
- use-auth-providersSkill
- use-authSkill
- use-browserSkill
- use-channelsSkill
- use-chatSkill
- use-code-shapeSkill
- use-databaseSkill
- use-dataSkill
- use-deep-memorySkill
- use-deploySkill
- use-designSkill
- use-development-stepsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Every guard passed before you touched anything.
- Distinctive: line 59
No key, the owner's session, a phone, a Telegram account — name the missing proof in the report, in the same message, and do not replace it …
- Distinctive: line 91
If point 1 cannot be filled, the work is not finished: it is unmeasured.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
use-testing
Process: build. A hint, not a law, in HOW you prove: know a better way for the case in front of you — use it and say so.
1. Two proofs, from different planes
A step or a substep closes on two proofs from different planes — otherwise the same thing was measured twice.
| Plane | Answers |
| the tree | is the code well-formed — guards, types, structure |
| the wire | what the node actually answers — status, headers, body of a door or a page |
| the eye | what a person sees — a real browser, both themes, a narrow screen, a real mouse |
| the data | what was written — a row, a file, a commit, a tag on GitHub |
| the story | is this the thing that was ASKED for — the owner's word |
A proof has four fields: what was run · the verbatim output · what it proves · how it would look without the change. The last field separates a proof from a ritual. A build log is never one of the two: «it compiles», «200», «RC=0» say nothing of the capability.
2. Green was green BEFORE your change — so one proof carries a negative control
Every guard passed before you touched anything. So one proof breaks the thing on purpose, sees it fail, and puts it back: spoil the input
(a wrong name, a missing section, a returned row), remove the fix (old code, same probe), or ask about something known to be absent. A
guard that stays green on a spoiled input is blind — and that is a finding, not a pass. When the live data cannot be changed without the
owner (a published element, a person's records), spoil the input on the way instead: a copy in a temporary folder, or the door's answer
replaced inside the browser (CDP Fetch.fulfillRequest).
3. The defects no guard catches
Markup can be correct and wrong: a page that reads like another site, blocks that do not tell a story, a section repeated in another guise. The proof is comparison — the page and its neighbour side by side — and the owner's eye. Scrolling, timing, anything a page does by itself is proven in a real browser with a person's timing, not by a fixed pause.
4. Measurements that lied here — each looked like success
/api/health→commitis the commit the process started on;builtAtis the build. After a rebuild also count the page's/_next/static/*files that do not answer 200.npm run build | tailprints tail's exit code, always 0. Log to a file,RC=$?right after npm, require a marker.- pm2
onlinefor a process in an endless restart loop: watch the restart count, uptime GROWING between two samples, and who holds the port. - A page whose data an island fetches after load has none of that data in its server HTML — a
curlfinds nothing even when it works. Prove it in a browser, or ask the door the island asks. - A search over a whole page finds the navigation: menus, crumbs and footers print every page's title. Address the element that
belongs to this page (
<h1>, adata-*mark); the same check on ANOTHER page must answer differently. git statusundercore.autocrlfshows «M» for a file rewritten with the same text; askgit diff --cached HEADaftergit add.- Search by meaning always returns the nearest neighbour — «nothing found» needs a threshold or a filter.
grepin Git Bash:-Pfails on the locale and reads as 0,-idoes not fold Cyrillic,-c $'\r'counts every line. Zero is not «not there» until a known-present item gives one.- The service worker serves yesterday's build in today's browser: unregister it AND clear
caches. - A hidden browser tab reports width 0; check
document.visibilityStatebefore trusting an automated measurement.
5. What cannot be proven — say it, never substitute
No key, the owner's session, a phone, a Telegram account — name the missing proof in the report, in the same message, and do not replace it with something easy to obtain. Never simulate what the owner does in five seconds (a voice note, a sign-in, a payment): the simulation checks another path. When the proof needs a live run of an agent with a model, it runs only by the owner's word, with its price named.
6. The form — and the owner's command
The owner may ask for proof at any moment («show me the proof», «докажи», «покажи доказательства» — one request). Answer with what is done by that minute, in this form — an empty field is visible, prose hides it:
PROOF 1 — plane <which>
ran: <command / request / action>
output: <verbatim>
proves: <which line means it works>
without it: <how the same output would look without the change>
PROOF 2 — plane <another>
…
NEGATIVE CONTROL
case: <the input whose answer must differ>
answer: <and it differed — like this>
DELIVERY (not a proof)
build / release / restart: <exit codes, hashes, tags>
NOT PROVEN
<what needs the owner or is out of reach, and why>7. Before you say «done»
- Name the two planes and paste the verbatim output of each.
- Say what would have looked different without the change.
- Say what remains unproven — plainly, in the same message.
If point 1 cannot be filled, the work is not finished: it is unmeasured.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

