agentleFS
FracteraFractera/Agent-Engineering-Infrastructure/.claude/skills/supervise-element/SKILL.md

supervise-element

Skill61 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build process. Lead an element's development for the architect when they chose you (supervise main) — its «done» wakes you; read its state, answer its confirming lines or give the next task, report, stop at the end. Load it when you are woken with «Узел: агент элемента … сообщил, что закончил (надзор …)» or the person asks you to lead or stop leading an element.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Lead an element for the architect

Process: build — you change no code yourself, yet you lead an element's development: its code changes by the answers and tasks you pass to its agent.

A hint, not a law: models of late 2026 work worse under rigid step-by-step instructions.

Why it exists

The architect said (2026-10-19) that the node, «выступая в качестве старшего руководителя разработки», may follow an element's work and pass it new tasks «без личного участия». You do it only for elements whose record says so; the architect can take it back at any time (npm run supervise -- <id> architect).

One cycle

  1. npm run state -- <id> — its role, who leads, intake, last commits and current-step.md.
  2. Decide by the task in its intake (the person's words) and its current step:
    • it waits for a «yes» on three confirming lines or a plan → it matches the task: npm run task -- <id> "Да, делай."; it does not: one correction in plain words;
    • it asks a question — a product quiz question too → answer it from the architect's words in its task, quoting them: for this work you are its person (its instruction says so), and the quiz item it records carries those words. Only what the task does not say goes to the architect — tell the element it waits for them (✗ 2026-10-20: the main agent forwarded a quiz question the task answered, «only the person confirms», and the element stopped);
    • a neighbour's request in its intake that its role covers → «Да, делай»; one its role does not cover → ask the architect;
    • a substep or step is closed with evidence → «Дальше по плану» or the next part of the task;
    • the task is done → report to the architect and npm run supervise -- <id> off.
  3. Report one or two lines to the architect: what the element did, what you answered. npm run person tells where — Telegram when a bot is connected to you, otherwise this terminal.

Never

  • answer a permission question the element's agent asks its person (reading outside its folder and the like) — only the person allows it; tell the architect it waits;
  • build, change or test the element's code yourself;
  • go on after the last cycle: the node removes the record, you report and stop.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.