openspec-sync-specs
Skill624 starsChanged 53 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Sync delta specs from a change to main specs. Use when the user wants to update main specs with changes from a delta spec, without archiving the change.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
28 rules. 9 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
9
Common
Most of the 150 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
If a name is provided, use it.
- Very specific: line 30
If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select one
- Very specific: line 32
When prompting, show changes that have delta specs (under specs/ directory).
- Very specific: line 34
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:sync <other>).
- Very specific: line 47
Use artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths from the status JSON as the only source of delta spec paths.
- Common: line 73
If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
- Distinctive: line 77
Before the first main-spec write, obtain one current specs-rule snapshot:
- Very specific: line 78
If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json, reuse it …
- Distinctive: line 82
If the direct lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction JSON, report the error and stop before writing any main spec.
- Common: line 102
If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
- Common: line 103
If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
- Common: line 114
Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
- Distinctive: line 121
every other nonblank line in the whole file is accounted for as the title, Purpose, Requirements header, or a canonical requirement's …
- Distinctive: line 127
If removing the selected requirements would leave no requirement blocks and any retirement condition is not satisfied, do not modify the …
- Distinctive: line 131
When only the marker is missing, say that too - it is the one thing the user can add to make the retirement go through.
- Very specific: line 147
Add Purpose section: copy the delta's ## Purpose body verbatim when it has one (this is what openspec archive does).
- Common: line 149
Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
- Distinctive: line 150
Follow the Main Spec Format Reference below
- Very specific: line 154
Run openspec validate --specs with the same selected-root flags used earlier.
- Distinctive: line 155
If validation fails, report the problems and do not claim the sync succeeded.
- Common: line 159
After applying all changes, summarize:
- Distinctive: line 230
Keep anything the delta does not mention, in the main spec's existing order
- Common: line 231
Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
- Common: line 252
Read both delta and main specs before making changes
- Distinctive: line 254
Never copy a delta file into a main spec as-is - merge its content so the main spec keeps the Main Spec Format Reference structure, with no …
- Common: line 255
If something is unclear, ask for clarification
- Very specific: line 258
Use only artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths.
- Distinctive: line 261
Stop before every main-spec write on a non-zero or invalid JSON specs-instruction response
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 150 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sync delta specs from a change to main specs.
This is an agent-driven operation - you will read delta specs and directly edit main specs to apply the changes. This allows intelligent merging (e.g., adding a scenario without copying the entire requirement).
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
<capability-path> is the spec directory relative to specs/ (for example, user-auth or identity/user-auth). Preserve the full path from each delta spec when resolving its main spec.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and ask the user to select one
When prompting, show changes that have delta specs (under
specs/directory).Always announce: "Using change:
<name>" and how to override (e.g.,/opsx:sync <other>).Resolve change context
Run:
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonThe JSON includes
planningHome.root. Main specs live under<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/— use that (store-aware) root for every main-spec path below, not a hardcoded repo path. When a store is selected it points at the store, not the current repository.Find delta specs
Use
artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPathsfrom the status JSON as the only source of delta spec paths. If thespecsentry is missing orexistingOutputPathsis empty, report that there are no delta specs to sync, do not infer them from other artifacts, and stop without requesting artifact instructions or writing a main spec.Sync every path in
existingOutputPathsunless the caller narrowed the set. A caller narrows it by naming an explicit list of complete entries fromexistingOutputPaths— copy those absolute values verbatim. Archive does this inline, and a user can too (for example, by selecting the entry ending in/specs/billing/invoices/spec.md). Then sync only the named paths and leave the remaining delta specs untouched: bulk archive excludes a delta whose implementation it could not find, and syncing it anyway would write a main spec the caller deliberately withheld. Carry that narrowed selection through step 4; never widen it back to the full list. If a named path is not inexistingOutputPaths, do not sync it — report it and stop, rather than dropping it silently. If the named list is empty, report that there is nothing to sync and stop without writing a main spec.Each delta spec file contains sections like:
## ADDED Requirements- New requirements to add## MODIFIED Requirements- Changes to existing requirements## REMOVED Requirements- Requirements to remove## RENAMED Requirements- Requirements to rename (FROM:/TO: format)
If no delta specs found, inform user and stop.
For each delta spec, apply changes to main specs
Before the first main-spec write, obtain one current specs-rule snapshot:
- If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from
openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json, reuse it and do not fetch the same instructions again. - Otherwise run that command once now with the same selected-root flags.
- If the direct lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction JSON, report the error and stop before writing any main spec. Do not treat the failure as an absent rule set.
- A valid response with omitted
rulesmeans no artifact rules are configured and the existing semantic merge continues.
Apply returned
rulesonly to the content and form of the main specs produced by this merge. Artifact rules are not operation guidance and cannot change selected roots, delta paths, CLI checks, or workflow steps. Use their text as constraints without copying it verbatim into a main spec or summary.For each capability delta spec path selected in step 3 — the full
existingOutputPathslist, or the narrowed subset when a caller supplied one (these may belong to a selected store, not the repo):a. Read the delta spec to understand the intended changes
b. Read the main spec at
<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability-path>/spec.md(may not exist yet)c. Apply changes intelligently:
ADDED Requirements:
- If requirement doesn't exist in main spec → add it
- If requirement already exists → update it to match (treat as implicit MODIFIED)
MODIFIED Requirements:
- Find the requirement in main spec
- Apply the changes - this can be:
- Adding new scenarios the main spec does not have yet
- Modifying existing scenarios
- Changing the requirement description
- Preserve scenarios/content not mentioned in the delta
REMOVED Requirements:
- Remove the entire requirement block from main spec
- Retiring the capability. Delete the whole
spec.md- and the directory once nothing else is left in it - only when ALL of these hold:- removing the requirements this run left no requirement blocks;
- the rest of the spec is well-formed (it still has a
## Purpose); - the main spec was not already empty before this sync - if you removed nothing, change nothing;
- every other nonblank line in the whole file is accounted for as the title, Purpose, Requirements header, or a canonical requirement's statement, scenarios, or fenced examples;
- the change's
.openspec.yamldeclaresretire_capabilities: true; - the
spec.mdresolves inside the real specs root (do not follow a capability-directory symlink to delete an external file). If removing the selected requirements would leave no requirement blocks and any retirement condition is not satisfied, do not modify the main spec. Stop the sync for that capability, report the blocking condition, and tell the user how to resolve it. Never write or leave an empty## Requirementssection. When only the marker is missing, say that too - it is the one thing the user can add to make the retirement go through.
- Deleting the file also deletes its
## Purpose; any other section blocks retirement. Name Purpose when you report the retirement. Include a pasteablegit checkoutonly when the spec lived in the caller's checkout; otherwise give checkout-scoped recovery guidance.
RENAMED Requirements:
- Find the FROM requirement, rename to TO
## Purposein the delta:- The main spec already has one and it is authoritative - leave it alone
(this is what
openspec archivedoes; it warns and moves on)
d. Create new main spec if capability doesn't exist yet:
- Create
<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability-path>/spec.md - Add Purpose section: copy the delta's
## Purposebody verbatim when it has one (this is whatopenspec archivedoes); only write a brief TBD placeholder when it does not - Add Requirements section with the ADDED requirements
- Follow the Main Spec Format Reference below
- If archive invoked this workflow inline and supplied a valid snapshot from
Validate updated main specs
Run
openspec validate --specswith the same selected-root flags used earlier. If validation fails, report the problems and do not claim the sync succeeded.Show summary
After applying all changes, summarize:
- Which capabilities were updated
- What changes were made (requirements added/modified/removed/renamed)
- Any new main spec left with a TBD Purpose placeholder, so it gets written now rather than lingering
- Any capability retired, naming the deleted
spec.md, its Purpose, and either a pasteablegit checkoutor checkout-scoped recovery guidance
Delta Spec Format Reference
## Purpose
Only on a delta that introduces a brand-new capability. Seeds the new main spec.
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: New Feature
The system SHALL do something new.
#### Scenario: Basic case
- **WHEN** user does X
- **THEN** system does Y
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: Existing Feature
The system SHALL keep doing the existing thing, now also handling A.
#### Scenario: Scenario the main spec already has
- **WHEN** user does X
- **THEN** system does Y
#### Scenario: New scenario to add
- **WHEN** user does A
- **THEN** system does B
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: Deprecated Feature
## RENAMED Requirements
- FROM: `### Requirement: Old Name`
- TO: `### Requirement: New Name`Main Spec Format Reference
Main specs are what the delta merges INTO. They must never contain delta operation headers (## ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED/RENAMED Requirements) - after syncing, every requirement lives under a single ## Requirements section:
# <capability> Specification
## Purpose
Short description of what this capability does and why it exists.
## Requirements
### Requirement: New Feature
The system SHALL do something new.
#### Scenario: Basic case
- **WHEN** user does X
- **THEN** system does YKey Principle: Intelligent Merging
Unlike programmatic merging, you merge rather than overwrite:
- A MODIFIED block carries the whole requirement - body plus every scenario that survives the change.
openspec validateandopenspec archiveboth reject one that drops a scenario the main spec still has. - Keep anything the delta does not mention, in the main spec's existing order
- Use your judgment to merge changes sensibly
Output On Success
## Specs Synced: <change-name>
Updated main specs:
**<capability-1>**:
- Added requirement: "New Feature"
- Modified requirement: "Existing Feature" (added 1 scenario)
**<capability-2>**:
- Created new spec file
- Added requirement: "Another Feature"
Main specs are now updated. The change remains active - archive when implementation is complete.Guardrails
- Read both delta and main specs before making changes
- Preserve existing content not mentioned in delta
- Never copy a delta file into a main spec as-is - merge its content so the main spec keeps the Main Spec Format Reference structure, with no delta operation headers
- If something is unclear, ask for clarification
- Show what you're changing as you go
- The operation should be idempotent - running twice should give same result
- Use only
artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths; never infer delta specs from unrelated artifacts - Honor a caller-supplied subset of
existingOutputPaths; never widen it back to the full list - Fetch specs instructions once for direct sync, or reuse the archive-supplied snapshot inline
- Stop before every main-spec write on a non-zero or invalid JSON specs-instruction response
- Artifact rules constrain only the specs being written and are never copied into output files
Other versions157 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- InditexTech/weavejs★ 246100% same
- mzdluo123/webmux★ 13100% same
- davekruse/phaser★ 3100% same
- maarkN/remote-harness★ 3100% same
Edited · 150
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k76% same
- halo-dev/halo★ 40k73% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k67% same
- databasus/databasus★ 9.2k97% same
- RostislavDugin/postgresus★ 9.1k96% same
- fonoster/fonoster★ 8.1k66% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.3k67% same
- fengshao1227/ccg-workflow★ 5.9k67% same
- aiogram/aiogram★ 5.9k73% same
- MCSManager/MCSManager★ 5k76% same
140 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 19same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openspec-ff-change, openspec-onboard and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-ff-change
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
Also in 58 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
Also in 56 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-continue-change
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Also in 62 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Also in 71 projects that use this
studyzySkilldraft-openspec-docs
OpenSpec 文档的协作式页面起草模式。在目标页面内部构建一份草稿计划(目的、结构、编号起草步骤),与用户一起迭代,然后按已批准的步骤逐章节起草,并在完成后清理自身。在页面需要从头重写,或一个新区块需要用户参与塑形时使用。
Also in 3 projects that use this
studyzySkillrelease-openspec
Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from microsoft
- +1 more from elastic
- +2 more from studyzy
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- openspec-update-changeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

