openspec-apply-change
Skill624 starsChanged 53 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
27 rules. 13 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
13
Common
Most of the 143 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 23
If a name is provided, use it.
- Very specific: line 26
If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select one
- Very specific: line 28
Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).
- Very specific: line 54
If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using /opsx:continue (if it is not installed, run openspec status --change …
- Very specific: line 55
If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
- Very specific: line 58
Treat context as a required prompt-level input.
- Very specific: line 60
Treat operationGuidance as optional additive advice.
- Very specific: line 64
Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks, progress, contextFiles, and the built-in instruction.
- Very specific: line 75
Read every file path listed under contextFiles from the apply instructions output.
- Very specific: line 80
Do not copy context or operationGuidance verbatim into implementation files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that …
- Common: line 96
Keep changes minimal and focused
- Common: line 112
If all done: suggest archive
- Common: line 113
If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
- Common: line 167
Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Common: line 168
Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- Common: line 169
If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- Common: line 170
If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Common: line 171
Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Common: line 172
Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Distinctive: line 174
When a task needs work beyond what the spec describes, surface the added scope and pause - never silently narrow, defer, or simplify away …
- Very specific: line 175
Only mark a task - [x] when its specified behavior is fully implemented, not when it is partially done or deferred
- Common: line 176
Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Distinctive: line 177
Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
- Distinctive: line 179
Consider every guidance entry.
- Distinctive: line 180
Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
- Common: line 187
Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Common: line 188
Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 143 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx:apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and ask the user to select one
Always announce: "Using change:
<name>" and how to override (e.g.,/opsx:apply <other>).- Check status to understand the schema
Parse the JSON to understand:openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonschemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")planningHome,changeRoot, andactionContext: planning scope and edit constraints- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --jsonThis returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
- Optional
context: current required project instruction input from the selected root - Optional
operationGuidance: current advisory guidance for apply
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked"(missing artifacts): show message, suggest using/opsx:continue(if it is not installed, runopenspec status --change "<name>" --jsonto see the next artifact andopenspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --jsonfor how to create it) - If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Treat
contextas a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing. TreatoperationGuidanceas optional additive advice. Read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in workflow.Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks, progress,
contextFiles, and the built-ininstruction. They are not evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.Read context files
Read every file path listed under
contextFilesfrom the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
Do not copy
contextoroperationGuidanceverbatim into implementation files or planning artifacts unless the user separately asks for that content.Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ]→- [x] - Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- A task needs work beyond what the spec and tasks describe, or you are tempted to drop, narrow, defer, or accept exceptions to specified behavior to make it fit → surface the added scope and ask; do not absorb it silently
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task completeOutput On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx:archive`.Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?Guardrails
- Keep going through tasks until done or blocked
- Always read context files before starting (from the apply instructions output)
- If task is ambiguous, pause and ask before implementing
- If implementation reveals issues, pause and suggest artifact updates
- Keep code changes minimal and scoped to each task
- Update task checkbox immediately after completing each task
- Pause on errors, blockers, or unclear requirements - don't guess
- When a task needs work beyond what the spec describes, surface the added scope and pause - never silently narrow, defer, or simplify away specified behavior
- Only mark a task
- [x]when its specified behavior is fully implemented, not when it is partially done or deferred - Use contextFiles from CLI output, don't assume specific file names
- Do not use context or operation guidance as proof that a task is complete
- Apply relevant project context; report conflicts with controlling workflow inputs
- Consider every guidance entry; explain any inapplicable or conflicting advice
- Do not copy runtime context or operation guidance into implementation files or planning artifacts
- Preserve CLI-controlled blocked/ready/all-done behavior and completion criteria
Fluid Workflow Integration
This skill supports the "actions on a change" model:
- Can be invoked anytime: Before all artifacts are done (if tasks exist), after partial implementation, interleaved with other actions
- Allows artifact updates: If implementation reveals design issues, suggest updating artifacts - not phase-locked, work fluidly
Other versions151 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- InditexTech/weavejs★ 246100% same
- mzdluo123/webmux★ 13100% same
- davekruse/phaser★ 3100% same
- maarkN/remote-harness★ 2100% same
Edited · 141
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k63% same
- halo-dev/halo★ 40k91% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k86% same
- databasus/databasus★ 9.2k95% same
- RostislavDugin/postgresus★ 9.1k91% same
- fonoster/fonoster★ 8.1k82% same
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.1k88% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.3k84% same
- KunAgent/Kun★ 6.3k88% same
- XingYu-Zhong/DeepSeek-GUI★ 6.3k88% same
131 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 6
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name
- henhen6/mdp★ 133same name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- beautifulSoup/speccoding-template★ 62same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 19same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use source-command-opsx-apply, source-command-opsx-archive and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-apply
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change (Experimental)
Also in 5 projects that use this
antech2-asyncSkillsource-command-opsx-archive
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow
Also in 5 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-verify-change
Verify implementation matches change artifacts. Use when the user wants to validate that implementation is complete, correct, and coherent before archiving.
Also in 74 projects that use this
ElasticSkillopenspec-continue-change
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
Also in 63 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-ff-change
Fast-forward through OpenSpec artifact creation. Use when the user wants to quickly create all artifacts needed for implementation without stepping through each one individually.
Also in 58 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillopenspec-onboard
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
Also in 56 projects that use this
- +2 more from antech2-async
- +1 more from microsoft
- +1 more from elastic
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-update-changeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

