perl-testing
Skill61 starsChanged 56 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Perl testing patterns using Test2::V0, Test::More, prove runner, mocking, coverage with Devel::Cover, and TDD methodology.
11 other projects use a version of this, 11 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codeedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- renepf/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- gongyijie85/dsh-eccedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-libraryedited, first seen Aug 1, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 11
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272100% same
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 899% same
- ronmkr/PromptBook★ 2100% same
- junimnjw/everything-claude-code★ 162% same
- Rojios/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1100% same
- TironFox/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- PeterYang888/claude-skills★ 0100% same
1 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository319 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/common-agents.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-auto-intuition.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-development-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-git-workflow.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-performance.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/common-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/egc-context.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/golang-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/kotlin-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/php-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/python-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/swift-testing.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-coding-style.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-patterns.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-security.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-testing.mdCursor rule
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- api-designSkill
- article-writingSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- content-engineSkill
- crosspostSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dmux-workflowsSkill
- documentation-lookupSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
6
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 22
Always follow the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
- Very specific: line 313
Place reusable helpers in t/lib/TestHelper.pm and load with use lib 't/lib'.
- Common: line 378
Use in-memory SQLite for database tests, mock HTTP::Tiny for API tests.
- Common: line 403
Follow TDD: Write tests before implementation (red-green-refactor)
- Very specific: line 407
Use
prove -l: Always include lib/ in @INC - Common: line 415
Don't test implementation: Test behavior and output, not internals
- Very specific: line 419
Don't use
Test::Morefor new projects: Prefer Test2::V0 - Common: line 420
Don't ignore test failures: All tests must pass before merge
- Common: line 422
Don't write brittle tests: Avoid over-specific string matching
- Very specific: line 473
Use my variables inside subtests: never our: to prevent state leaking between tests.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Perl Testing Patterns
Comprehensive testing strategies for Perl applications using Test2::V0, Test::More, prove, and TDD methodology.
When to Activate
- Writing new Perl code (follow TDD: red, green, refactor)
- Designing test suites for Perl modules or applications
- Reviewing Perl test coverage
- Setting up Perl testing infrastructure
- Migrating tests from Test::More to Test2::V0
- Debugging failing Perl tests
TDD Workflow
Always follow the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
# Step 1: RED: Write a failing test
# t/unit/calculator.t
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
use lib 'lib';
use Calculator;
subtest 'addition' => sub {
my $calc = Calculator->new;
is($calc->add(2, 3), 5, 'adds two numbers');
is($calc->add(-1, 1), 0, 'handles negatives');
};
done_testing;
# Step 2: GREEN: Write minimal implementation
# lib/Calculator.pm
package Calculator;
use v5.36;
use Moo;
sub add($self, $a, $b) {
return $a + $b;
}
1;
# Step 3: REFACTOR: Improve while tests stay green
# Run: prove -lv t/unit/calculator.tTest::More Fundamentals
The standard Perl testing module: widely used, ships with core.
Basic Assertions
use v5.36;
use Test::More;
# Plan upfront or use done_testing
# plan tests => 5; # Fixed plan (optional)
# Equality
is($result, 42, 'returns correct value');
isnt($result, 0, 'not zero');
# Boolean
ok($user->is_active, 'user is active');
ok(!$user->is_banned, 'user is not banned');
# Deep comparison
is_deeply(
$got,
{ name => 'Alice', roles => ['admin'] },
'returns expected structure'
);
# Pattern matching
like($error, qr/not found/i, 'error mentions not found');
unlike($output, qr/password/, 'output hides password');
# Type check
isa_ok($obj, 'MyApp::User');
can_ok($obj, 'save', 'delete');
done_testing;SKIP and TODO
use v5.36;
use Test::More;
# Skip tests conditionally
SKIP: {
skip 'No database configured', 2 unless $ENV{TEST_DB};
my $db = connect_db();
ok($db->ping, 'database is reachable');
is($db->version, '15', 'correct PostgreSQL version');
}
# Mark expected failures
TODO: {
local $TODO = 'Caching not yet implemented';
is($cache->get('key'), 'value', 'cache returns value');
}
done_testing;Test2::V0 Modern Framework
Test2::V0 is the modern replacement for Test::More: richer assertions, better diagnostics, and extensible.
Why Test2?
- Superior deep comparison with hash/array builders
- Better diagnostic output on failures
- Subtests with cleaner scoping
- Extensible via Test2::Tools::* plugins
- Backward-compatible with Test::More tests
Deep Comparison with Builders
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
# Hash builder: check partial structure
is(
$user->to_hash,
hash {
field name => 'Alice';
field email => match(qr/\@example\.com$/);
field age => validator(sub { $_ >= 18 });
# Ignore other fields
etc();
},
'user has expected fields'
);
# Array builder
is(
$result,
array {
item 'first';
item match(qr/^second/);
item DNE(); # Does Not Exist: verify no extra items
},
'result matches expected list'
);
# Bag: order-independent comparison
is(
$tags,
bag {
item 'perl';
item 'testing';
item 'tdd';
},
'has all required tags regardless of order'
);Subtests
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
subtest 'User creation' => sub {
my $user = User->new(name => 'Alice', email => 'alice@example.com');
ok($user, 'user object created');
is($user->name, 'Alice', 'name is set');
is($user->email, 'alice@example.com', 'email is set');
};
subtest 'User validation' => sub {
my $warnings = warns {
User->new(name => '', email => 'bad');
};
ok($warnings, 'warns on invalid data');
};
done_testing;Exception Testing with Test2
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
# Test that code dies
like(
dies { divide(10, 0) },
qr/Division by zero/,
'dies on division by zero'
);
# Test that code lives
ok(lives { divide(10, 2) }, 'division succeeds') or note($@);
# Combined pattern
subtest 'error handling' => sub {
ok(lives { parse_config('valid.json') }, 'valid config parses');
like(
dies { parse_config('missing.json') },
qr/Cannot open/,
'missing file dies with message'
);
};
done_testing;Test Organization and prove
Directory Structure
t/
├── 00-load.t # Verify modules compile
├── 01-basic.t # Core functionality
├── unit/
│ ├── config.t # Unit tests by module
│ ├── user.t
│ └── util.t
├── integration/
│ ├── database.t
│ └── api.t
├── lib/
│ └── TestHelper.pm # Shared test utilities
└── fixtures/
├── config.json # Test data files
└── users.csvprove Commands
# Run all tests
prove -l t/
# Verbose output
prove -lv t/
# Run specific test
prove -lv t/unit/user.t
# Recursive search
prove -lr t/
# Parallel execution (8 jobs)
prove -lr -j8 t/
# Run only failing tests from last run
prove -l --state=failed t/
# Colored output with timer
prove -l --color --timer t/
# TAP output for CI
prove -l --formatter TAP::Formatter::JUnit t/ > results.xml.proverc Configuration
-l
--color
--timer
-r
-j4
--state=saveFixtures and Setup/Teardown
Subtest Isolation
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
use File::Temp qw(tempdir);
use Path::Tiny;
subtest 'file processing' => sub {
# Setup
my $dir = tempdir(CLEANUP => 1);
my $file = path($dir, 'input.txt');
$file->spew_utf8("line1\nline2\nline3\n");
# Test
my $result = process_file("$file");
is($result->{line_count}, 3, 'counts lines');
# Teardown happens automatically (CLEANUP => 1)
};Shared Test Helpers
Place reusable helpers in t/lib/TestHelper.pm and load with use lib 't/lib'. Export factory functions like create_test_db(), create_temp_dir(), and fixture_path() via Exporter.
Mocking
Test::MockModule
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
use Test::MockModule;
subtest 'mock external API' => sub {
my $mock = Test::MockModule->new('MyApp::API');
# Good: Mock returns controlled data
$mock->mock(fetch_user => sub ($self, $id) {
return { id => $id, name => 'Mock User', email => 'mock@test.com' };
});
my $api = MyApp::API->new;
my $user = $api->fetch_user(42);
is($user->{name}, 'Mock User', 'returns mocked user');
# Verify call count
my $call_count = 0;
$mock->mock(fetch_user => sub { $call_count++; return {} });
$api->fetch_user(1);
$api->fetch_user(2);
is($call_count, 2, 'fetch_user called twice');
# Mock is automatically restored when $mock goes out of scope
};
# Bad: Monkey-patching without restoration
# *MyApp::API::fetch_user = sub { ... }; # NEVER: leaks across testsFor lightweight mock objects, use Test::MockObject to create injectable test doubles with ->mock() and verify calls with ->called_ok().
Coverage with Devel::Cover
Running Coverage
# Basic coverage report
cover -test
# Or step by step
perl -MDevel::Cover -Ilib t/unit/user.t
cover
# HTML report
cover -report html
open cover_db/coverage.html
# Specific thresholds
cover -test -report text | grep 'Total'
# CI-friendly: fail under threshold
cover -test && cover -report text -select '^lib/' \
| perl -ne 'if (/Total.*?(\d+\.\d+)/) { exit 1 if $1 < 80 }'Integration Testing
Use in-memory SQLite for database tests, mock HTTP::Tiny for API tests.
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
use DBI;
subtest 'database integration' => sub {
my $dbh = DBI->connect('dbi:SQLite:dbname=:memory:', '', '', {
RaiseError => 1,
});
$dbh->do('CREATE TABLE users (id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT)');
$dbh->prepare('INSERT INTO users (name) VALUES (?)')->execute('Alice');
my $row = $dbh->selectrow_hashref('SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = ?', undef, 'Alice');
is($row->{name}, 'Alice', 'inserted and retrieved user');
};
done_testing;Best Practices
DO
- Follow TDD: Write tests before implementation (red-green-refactor)
- Use Test2::V0: Modern assertions, better diagnostics
- Use subtests: Group related assertions, isolate state
- Mock external dependencies: Network, database, file system
- Use
prove -l: Always include lib/ in@INC - Name tests clearly:
'user login with invalid password fails' - Test edge cases: Empty strings, undef, zero, boundary values
- Aim for 80%+ coverage: Focus on business logic paths
- Keep tests fast: Mock I/O, use in-memory databases
DON'T
- Don't test implementation: Test behavior and output, not internals
- Don't share state between subtests: Each subtest should be independent
- Don't skip
done_testing: Ensures all planned tests ran - Don't over-mock: Mock boundaries only, not the code under test
- Don't use
Test::Morefor new projects: Prefer Test2::V0 - Don't ignore test failures: All tests must pass before merge
- Don't test CPAN modules: Trust libraries to work correctly
- Don't write brittle tests: Avoid over-specific string matching
Quick Reference
| Task | Command / Pattern |
| Run all tests | prove -lr t/ |
| Run one test verbose | prove -lv t/unit/user.t |
| Parallel test run | prove -lr -j8 t/ |
| Coverage report | cover -test && cover -report html |
| Test equality | is($got, $expected, 'label') |
| Deep comparison | is($got, hash { field k => 'v'; etc() }, 'label') |
| Test exception | like(dies { ... }, qr/msg/, 'label') |
| Test no exception | ok(lives { ... }, 'label') |
| Mock a method | Test::MockModule->new('Pkg')->mock(m => sub { ... }) |
| Skip tests | SKIP: { skip 'reason', $count unless $cond; ... } |
| TODO tests | TODO: { local $TODO = 'reason'; ... } |
Common Pitfalls
Forgetting done_testing
# Bad: Test file runs but doesn't verify all tests executed
use Test2::V0;
is(1, 1, 'works');
# Missing done_testing: silent bugs if test code is skipped
# Good: Always end with done_testing
use Test2::V0;
is(1, 1, 'works');
done_testing;Missing -l Flag
# Bad: Modules in lib/ not found
prove t/unit/user.t
# Can't locate MyApp/User.pm in @INC
# Good: Include lib/ in @INC
prove -l t/unit/user.tOver-Mocking
Mock the dependency, not the code under test. If your test only verifies that a mock returns what you told it to, it tests nothing.
Test Pollution
Use my variables inside subtests: never our: to prevent state leaking between tests.
Remember: Tests are your safety net. Keep them fast, focused, and independent. Use Test2::V0 for new projects, prove for running, and Devel::Cover for accountability.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

