systematic-debugging
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Investigate bugs, test failures, build failures, performance regressions, and unexpected behavior by reproducing the issue, tracing evidence, testing one hypothesis, and fixing the root cause. Use before speculative fixes; do not use for planned feature work without a failure.
190 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- chrysogonus/power-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- willy92wins/DayZ-Modding-Knowledge-Packtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
mjunaidcaSkillbuilding-chatgpt-apps
Guides creation of ChatGPT Apps with interactive widgets using OpenAI Apps SDK and MCP servers. Use when building ChatGPT custom apps with visual UI components, embedded widgets, or rich interactive experiences. Covers widget architecture, MCP server setup with FastMCP, response metadata, and Developer Mode configuration. NOT when building standard MCP servers without widgets (use building-mcp-servers skill instead).
Also in 4 projects that use this
mjunaidcaSkillbuilding-chat-interfaces
Build AI chat interfaces with custom backends, authentication, and context injection. Use when integrating chat UI with AI agents, adding auth to chat, injecting user/page context, or implementing httpOnly cookie proxies. Covers ChatKitServer, useChatKit, and MCP auth patterns. NOT when building simple chatbots without persistence or custom agent integration.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +5 more from mjunaidca
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 190
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262ksame name
- open-metadata/OpenMetadata★ 16ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- ChrisWiles/claude-code-showcase★ 6.1ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- global/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- api-designSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- brandSkill
- contract-firstSkill
- database-migrationsSkill
- engineering-task-workflowSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- fixing-accessibilitySkill
- frontend-designSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- intent-driven-developmentSkill
- react-native-patternsSkill
- react-patternsSkill
- react-testingSkill
- security-best-practicesSkill
- shadcnSkill
- supabase-postgres-best-practicesSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
16
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Read the complete useful error, stack trace, status code, and affected path.
- Distinctive: line 18
Check current Git changes, relevant recent changes, configuration, dependency versions, and runtime assumptions.
- Distinctive: line 21
If reproduction is unsafe or requires production, stop before the effect and build the strongest safe diagnostic path.
- Distinctive: line 27
Add temporary diagnostics only when existing evidence is insufficient.
- Distinctive: line 29
never dump the full environment.
- Distinctive: line 30
never print tokens, credentials, cookies, personal data, or connection strings.
- Distinctive: line 31
prefer presence, type, length, hash, status, or bounded identifiers.
- Distinctive: line 32
remove temporary diagnostics unless they are justified as lasting observability.
- Distinctive: line 40
If rejected, remove speculative changes and form a new hypothesis from the new evidence.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not stack several possible fixes into one experiment.
- Distinctive: line 42
After two failed correction attempts against the same symptom, stop patching and reassess the reproduction, assumptions, architecture, and …
- Distinctive: line 44
Ask the user only if a product decision, inaccessible environment, credential, or privileged action is required to continue.
- Distinctive: line 48
Add the smallest useful regression test or reproduction harness when practical.
- Distinctive: line 51
Run the focused reproduction and relevant surrounding checks.
- Distinctive: line 54
If the cause is external or environmental, implement only the handling justified by evidence: a clear error, validated retry, timeout, …
- Distinctive: line 66
Never report a fix when only the symptom disappeared once or when verification used a different environment without explaining the boundary.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Systematic Debugging
Find and verify the cause before changing behavior. A plausible explanation is a hypothesis until evidence supports it.
1. Establish the failure
- Read the complete useful error, stack trace, status code, and affected path.
- Reproduce with the smallest reliable command or sequence.
- Record whether the failure is deterministic, intermittent, environment-specific, or external.
- Check current Git changes, relevant recent changes, configuration, dependency versions, and runtime assumptions.
- Preserve unrelated user changes.
If reproduction is unsafe or requires production, stop before the effect and build the strongest safe diagnostic path.
2. Locate the failing boundary
Trace inputs and outputs across the shortest relevant path. Inspect the point where expected state first becomes incorrect.
Add temporary diagnostics only when existing evidence is insufficient. Diagnostics must be targeted and redacted:
- never dump the full environment;
- never print tokens, credentials, cookies, personal data, or connection strings;
- prefer presence, type, length, hash, status, or bounded identifiers;
- remove temporary diagnostics unless they are justified as lasting observability.
Compare with a working path in the same repository when available. Identify meaningful differences without assuming every difference is causal.
3. Test one hypothesis
State one falsifiable hypothesis and the evidence that would confirm or reject it. Test the smallest variable possible.
- If rejected, remove speculative changes and form a new hypothesis from the new evidence.
- Do not stack several possible fixes into one experiment.
- After two failed correction attempts against the same symptom, stop patching and reassess the reproduction, assumptions, architecture, and external documentation.
Ask the user only if a product decision, inaccessible environment, credential, or privileged action is required to continue.
4. Implement the root-cause fix
- Add the smallest useful regression test or reproduction harness when practical.
- Make one coherent fix at the source of the faulty behavior.
- Avoid opportunistic refactors.
- Run the focused reproduction and relevant surrounding checks.
- Inspect the final diff and remove temporary artifacts.
If the cause is external or environmental, implement only the handling justified by evidence: a clear error, validated retry, timeout, fallback, or observability. Do not disguise an unknown cause as fixed.
Completion evidence
Report:
- the observed root cause;
- the evidence that isolated it;
- the correction;
- the regression or reproduction result;
- relevant checks and remaining uncertainty.
Never report a fix when only the symptom disappeared once or when verification used a different environment without explaining the boundary.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

