agentleFS
EskyeeEskyee/agentbot-opensource/skills/aeon-defi-overview/SKILL.md

aeon-defi-overview

Skill17 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Daily DeFi read — regime verdict (RISK-ON / NEUTRAL / RISK-OFF) reproducible from named inputs, top TVL movers with one-line causal reasoning, and a sustainable-vs-incentive yield split so the operator can tell real product-market fit from emissions-pumped APY. Public APIs only. Triggers: "DeFi read", "DeFi regime today", "yield decomposition", "is this APY real or emissions", "DeFi movers with why".

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

aeon-defi-overview

The decision layer above DefiLlama. One read per day on the regime, the biggest movers with causal reasoning, and which yields are actually sustainable vs being paid for in inflation.

Regime verdict

One of RISK-ON / NEUTRAL / RISK-OFF. Computed from five inputs, each named in the output:

  • 24h aggregate TVL change across majors.
  • 24h DEX volume vs 30d average.
  • Leverage utilization on top lending markets.
  • Stablecoin net mint / burn.
  • Perp funding rates on majors.

Verdict is reproducible from these values — operator can disagree but not on the math.

Movers

Top 5 TVL gainers and top 5 losers. Per row: protocol + chain, 24h delta, one-line "why" (incentive launch, exploit, depeg, narrative, liquidation cascade) or "no obvious driver" if unclear.

Yields

Top protocols by TVL on each major chain, with the sustainable share (real / (real + incentives)). Yields under 20% sustainable share are flagged incentive-dependent — they evaporate when emissions end.

Sources

DefiLlama (api.llama.fi), GeckoTerminal, perp aggregators for funding rates.

Rules

  • Sustainable vs incentive is the headline lens.
  • "Why" or admit it's unclear. No filler.
  • Fees > TVL for fundamentals — declining TVL + rising fees is healthier than the reverse.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.