postmortem
Skill0 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when capturing an important bug or production failure — record the incident, root cause, fix, and lesson as an archivable markdown document.
44 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mehboobali98/rmine-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- SethGammon/Citadeltheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- flonat/flonat-researchtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- jp-solumhealth/jpstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- MakiDevelop/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use hypothesis-driven-debugging, status-report and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Sturla22Skillhypothesis-driven-debugging
Debug by ranking concrete hypotheses and running discriminating checks. Use when a bug is hard to localize, many plausible failure points exist, logs are noisy or misleading, a symptom appears intermittently, or trial-and-error edits haven't worked.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus-report
Generate a status report with KPIs, risks, and action items. Use when writing a weekly or monthly update for leadership, summarizing project health with green/yellow/red status, surfacing risks and decisions that need stakeholder attention, or turning a pile of project tracker activity into a readable narrative.
Also in 3 projects that use this
seongjaeryuSkillorganize
Organize knowledge into Sets
Also in 3 projects that use this
SaluteYBSkillskill-eval
Evaluate, tune, and regression-check AgentSkills. Use when creating a new skill or improving an existing one and you need structured should-trigger, should-not-trigger, boundary-case, and execution-quality examples. Also use when auditing overlapping skills and sharpening trigger descriptions before release.
Also in 3 projects that use this
neurofooSkillpremortem
Pre-mortem analysis that imagines a plan has failed, then works backward to identify causes and preventions. Use before launches, major decisions, or risky initiatives to surface hidden risks.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillincident-response
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions44 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 44
- dotnet/fsharp★ 4.3ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- boshu2/agentops★ 453same name
- flonat/flonat-research★ 150same name
- neurofoo/agent-skills★ 111same name
- Dimon94/dverity★ 107same name
- Dimon94/skills★ 107same name
- EthanReedLabs/sulde★ 99same name
- Hongyu-yu/matsci-ai-skills★ 19same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
34 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- arch-barSkill
- commsSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- exploit-huntSkill
- gdprSkill
- gen-umlSkill
- perf-barSkill
- security-barSkill
- spec-intakeSkill
- stack-gotchasSkill
- stacksSkill
- standardsSkill
- task-flowSkill
- ux-barSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 40 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
After an important bug or failure, capture what happened and why so the same class of problem can't quietly recur.
- Distinctive: line 17
NOT every small hiccup — a typo fixed in 30 seconds doesn't need a postmortem.
- Very specific: line 21
Find the real root cause first: Use superpowers:systematic-debugging — don't document the symptom or the first plausible guess.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 40 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
postmortem
Overview
After an important bug or failure, capture what happened and why so the same class of problem can't quietly recur. Blameless: the target is the system and the gap, not who typed it. The output is one archivable markdown file.
When to use
- A production failure, data issue, broken release, or a bug that cost real time.
- NOT every small hiccup — a typo fixed in 30 seconds doesn't need a postmortem.
Steps
- Find the real root cause first. Use
superpowers:systematic-debugging— don't document the symptom or the first plausible guess. The postmortem is only as good as the cause it names. - Fill the template from evidence, not memory: the actual error output, the commit/PR that fixed it, and the timeline if order mattered.
- Make prevention concrete. "Be more careful" is not prevention. Name the specific
thing that would have caught or blocked it: a test, a guard/validation, a CI gate, a
CLAUDE.mdnote, or a durable memory. - Save it outside the repo:
../<repo>-notes/postmortems/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md. Internal docs are never committed (seestandards) — archive it, don't ship it.
Template
# Postmortem: <short title>
- **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
- **Severity:** low | medium | high
- **Impact:** who/what was affected, for how long
## Incident
<one paragraph: the observable failure>
## Timeline (only if order mattered)
- HH:MM — …
## Root cause
<the underlying cause found via systematic-debugging — the "why", not the symptom>
## Fix
<what changed; commit / PR reference>
## Prevention
<the specific thing that stops this class of bug recurring>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

