agentleFS
EndikaEndika/eskills/skills/gen-uml/SKILL.md

gen-uml

Skill0 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when you need a Mermaid diagram (architecture, flow, or sequence) generated from existing code, and a check that the diagram matches what was actually built.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every box maps to a real module/function.

    line 20

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

gen-uml

Overview

Generate a Mermaid diagram from existing code — architecture, flow, or sequence — and verify it reflects what the code actually does, not what it was supposed to do.

Steps

  1. Read the real code for the slice you're diagramming (entry points, modules, call/data flow). Diagram what exists.
  2. Pick the diagram type that answers the question being asked (below).
  3. Emit Mermaid.
  4. Match-check (required): walk the diagram against the code one node/edge at a time. Every box maps to a real module/function; every arrow to a real call/dependency. Drop or fix anything you can't point to in the source. A diagram that quietly diverges is worse than none.

Types & examples

Architecture (modules/dependencies):

graph TD
  UI[UI] --> UC[Use cases]
  UC --> SVC[Services]
  SVC --> REPO[Repository]
  REPO --> DB[(Store)]

Flow (a process / decision path):

flowchart TD
  A[Receive task] --> B{Brownfield?}
  B -- yes --> C[Explore code]
  B -- no --> D[Brainstorm]
  C --> D --> E[Plan]

Sequence (interaction over time):

sequenceDiagram
  participant C as Client
  participant R as Repo
  participant DB as Store
  C->>R: save(entity)
  R->>DB: update(blob)
  DB-->>R: version
  R-->>C: ok

Output

The Mermaid block plus one line per diagram confirming the match-check passed (or listing what was corrected).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.