session-handoff
Skill0 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub
End of a meaningful implementation/review session or phase transition.
139 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aktsmm/Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wanshuiyin/HERO-Anti-OverDefensetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alapha888/session-handoff-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zedarvates/frugal-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Sirius-Ji/dsh-disciplinary-skills-for-greenhandstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- maideps/ai-harness-frameworktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ascii-diagram, research-fleet and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SethGammonSkillascii-diagram
Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SethGammonSkillresearch-fleet
Parallel research using Fleet wave mechanics. Spawns multiple scout agents, each investigating a different angle of the same question. Findings are compressed between waves. Produces a unified research brief from multiple independent perspectives.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vicoa-aiSkilllive-preview
Start a local app in the current user project, expose it through a tunnel, and return preview details in structured Markdown. Use when the user asks for a preview URL, public URL, shareable localhost, mobile/web preview, or tunnel setup.
Also in 4 projects that use this
botlearn-aiSkilldoc-gen
Also in 4 projects that use this
flyingobsidianSkillterminology
Read a codebase, find terminology, create/update definitions into a markdown document.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Dizzy-TenSkillbug-diagnosis
Diagnose bugs and product issues without modifying code. Use when the user explicitly invokes $bug-diagnosis or asks for diagnosis, root-cause analysis, issue classification, or fix strategy for code bugs, failing tests, configuration/dependency problems, deployment issues, performance regressions, data anomalies, or frontend/user-experience problems described through screenshots, annotations, logs, errors, or natural-language reports. Prioritize analysis and recommendations only; do not edit files.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from SethGammon
Other versions139 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 139
- rohitg00/pro-workflow★ 2.9ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- wanshuiyin/HERO-Anti-OverDefense★ 805same name
- OneWave-AI/claude-skills★ 378same name
- ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst★ 304same name
- entireio/skills★ 239same name
- Innei/SKILL★ 92same name
- yuzushi-dev/session-handoff★ 67same name
- Hive-Academy/ptah-extension★ 34same name
- Hive-Academy/PtahCode★ 34same name
129 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- global/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-decisionSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- documentation-governanceSkill
- existing-project-adoptionSkill
- implementation-executionSkill
- project-bootstrapSkill
- project-doctorSkill
- security-sensitive-changeSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tooling-bootstrapSkill
- workflow-auditSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- documentation-governanceSkill
- existing-project-adoptionSkill
- implementation-executionSkill
- project-bootstrapSkill
- project-doctorSkill
- security-sensitive-changeSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tooling-bootstrapSkill
- workflow-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 117 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Read current acceptance evidence and docs/system/HANDOFF_PROTOCOL.md.
- Very specific: line 34
Use Single-Focus Continuation for NEXT_SESSION: one handoff prompt = one unresolved execution target.
- Distinctive: line 47
Keep the check narrow: do not replay completed work or mine chat/transcript history unless a specific contradiction requires cold …
- Distinctive: line 51
Do not repeat the diff line by line, claim success beyond observed evidence, or ask for post-hoc approval after a clean finish unless …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 117 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Session Handoff
Read current acceptance evidence and docs/system/HANDOFF_PROTOCOL.md. Classify the
session as IN PROGRESS, PHASE COMPLETE, or PROJECT COMPLETE. On PHASE COMPLETE,
update canonical owners first, write the durable phase completion report, then write the
completed phase's compact ## Completion Record pointing to that report before updating
Roadmap markers. Retain Phase-owned task requests/prompts and observed outcome/evidence;
reference their IDs in the report. Update NEXT_SESSION only when hot navigation/state changes,
using an Active task prompt pointer instead of an editable executable prompt.
The phase completion report may preserve evidence-bounded technical detail useful to humans or later investigation. The Completion Record must remain small enough for normal progressive warm-up and must not duplicate the report. Legacy completed phases that predate separate completion reports remain valid and do not require automatic migration.
For a safe mid-work pause, remain IN PROGRESS: finish the current atomic unit or return it to a
known recoverable state, start no queued unit, and record only actual disk/project state plus
observed verification. State whether it is RUNNABLE / GREEN, KNOWN BROKEN / RECOVERABLE (with
the exact issue and first recovery action), or BLOCKED. Do not fabricate completion artifacts,
create another ledger, or require a WIP Git commit.
For a non-trivial task inside an active phase, preserve its request/prompt, freshness checks, observed result/evidence and relevant decisions/issues in its Phase-owned archive record. Keep the same ID for unchanged instructions; changed instructions require a replacement revision linked to the retained old record. Do not create one completion file per routine task.
Use Single-Focus Continuation for NEXT_SESSION: one handoff prompt = one unresolved
execution target. If the current task, acceptance criterion, manual verification, blocker, or
other gate remains open, both Next action and the referenced Phase prompt must focus only on closing
that target. Do not name or preload the next queued task/phase with wording such as "then
continue" or "after that start". Multiple substeps are allowed only when they all complete the
same target and share one acceptance boundary. Select later work only after the current target
is genuinely complete and its evidence/state has been persisted.
On a cold-start continuation, treat NEXT_SESSION as a pointer rather than authority. Reconcile
its target with the Roadmap/current Phase, live worktree/repository state, and decisive evidence
before acting. Apply the freshness check in docs/system/CONTEXT_PROTOCOL.md, even for a
record previously marked CURRENT. Preserve stale prompts and revise navigation/instructions
when those sources contradict them; migrate legacy inline prompts only when continuing them.
Keep the check narrow: do not replay
completed work or mine chat/transcript history unless a specific contradiction requires cold
historical evidence.
Do not repeat the diff line by line, claim success beyond observed evidence, or ask for post-hoc approval after a clean finish unless another risky step remains. Include the short launch instruction pointing to the saved Phase task ID and requiring a freshness check when the project continues; do not repeat the task prompt body. Never end a turn with only "waiting for confirmation/next action is X" — persist state and provide the continuation record pointer before yielding to the user.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

