agentleFS
ElguajoElguajo/Progressive-Context-Kit/.agents/skills/documentation-governance/SKILL.md

documentation-governance

Skill0 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub

Material edits to durable governance, architecture, ownership, project-policy, or decision documentation.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep implementation-coupled documentation accurate without creating an approval gate.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Update automatically when required by the approved implementation:

    line 11
  3. Distinctive:

    Stop and ask before materially changing durable governance or project-policy documents unless the user explicitly requested that document:

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    Before asking, state what should change, why, what implementation/validation already occurred, and whether the update is required or …

    line 24
  5. Distinctive:

    After approval, update only the canonical owner of each fact/rule.

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Documentation Governance

Keep implementation-coupled documentation accurate without creating an approval gate.

Update automatically when required by the approved implementation:

  • README usage/setup affected by the change;
  • API examples and configuration docs;
  • narrowly affected developer docs;
  • comments and docstrings.

Stop and ask before materially changing durable governance or project-policy documents unless the user explicitly requested that document:

  • AGENTS.md / AGENTS.override.md;
  • architecture or ownership policy;
  • project-wide process rules;
  • durable planning/decision logs such as TASKS.md, AI_CHANGELOG.md, or equivalent.

Before asking, state what should change, why, what implementation/validation already occurred, and whether the update is required or recommended. An explicit request to edit a named durable document is approval within that scope; ask again only if the edit materially exceeds it.

After approval, update only the canonical owner of each fact/rule. Reference other docs instead of duplicating project truth.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.