team-release
Skill19 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Orchestrate the release team: coordinates release-manager, qa-lead, devops-engineer, and producer to execute a release from candidate to deployment.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 5 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
5
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 8
When this skill is invoked, orchestrate the release team through a structured pipeline.
- Common: line 23
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
- Distinctive: line 29
Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (version number, milestone status, known issues).
- Common: line 55
Verify all strings are translated (delegate to localization-lead if available)
- Common: line 56
Run performance benchmarks against targets (delegate to performance-analyst if available)
- Common: line 76
producer: Update milestone tracking, communicate to stakeholders
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When this skill is invoked, orchestrate the release team through a structured pipeline.
Decision Points: At each phase transition, use AskUserQuestion to present
the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's
full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels.
The user must approve before moving to the next phase.
Team Composition
- release-manager — Release branch, versioning, changelog, deployment
- qa-lead — Test sign-off, regression suite, release quality gate
- devops-engineer — Build pipeline, artifacts, deployment automation
- producer — Go/no-go decision, stakeholder communication, scheduling
How to Delegate
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
subagent_type: release-manager— Release branch, versioning, changelog, deploymentsubagent_type: qa-lead— Test sign-off, regression suite, release quality gatesubagent_type: devops-engineer— Build pipeline, artifacts, deployment automationsubagent_type: producer— Go/no-go decision, stakeholder communication
Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (version number, milestone status, known issues). Launch independent agents in parallel where the pipeline allows it (e.g., Phase 3 agents can run simultaneously).
Pipeline
Phase 1: Release Planning
Delegate to producer:
- Confirm all milestone acceptance criteria are met
- Identify any scope items deferred from this release
- Set the target release date and communicate to team
- Output: release authorization with scope confirmation
Phase 2: Release Candidate
Delegate to release-manager:
- Cut release branch from the agreed commit
- Bump version numbers in all relevant files
- Generate the release checklist using
/release-checklist - Freeze the branch — no feature changes, bug fixes only
- Output: release branch name and checklist
Phase 3: Quality Gate (parallel)
Delegate in parallel:
- qa-lead: Execute full regression test suite. Test all critical paths. Verify no S1/S2 bugs. Sign off on quality.
- devops-engineer: Build release artifacts for all target platforms. Verify builds are clean and reproducible. Run automated tests in CI.
Phase 4: Localization and Performance
Delegate (can run in parallel with Phase 3 if resources available):
- Verify all strings are translated (delegate to localization-lead if available)
- Run performance benchmarks against targets (delegate to performance-analyst if available)
- Output: localization and performance sign-off
Phase 5: Go/No-Go
Delegate to producer:
- Collect sign-off from: qa-lead, release-manager, devops-engineer, technical-director
- Evaluate any open issues — are they blocking or can they ship?
- Make the go/no-go call
- Output: release decision with rationale
Phase 6: Deployment (if GO)
Delegate to release-manager + devops-engineer:
- Tag the release in version control
- Generate changelog using
/changelog - Deploy to staging for final smoke test
- Deploy to production
- Monitor for 48 hours post-release
Phase 7: Post-Release
- release-manager: Generate release report (what shipped, what was deferred, metrics)
- producer: Update milestone tracking, communicate to stakeholders
- qa-lead: Monitor incoming bug reports for regressions
- Schedule post-release retrospective if issues occurred
Output
A summary report covering: release version, scope, quality gate results, go/no-go decision, deployment status, and monitoring plan.
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- scotidev/GameDevStudio★ 1100% same
Edited · 9
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27k11% same
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 9338% same
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 7185% same
- dawn840705/codex-code-studios★ 1737% same
- lilangMax/ClaudeCodeGameStudios★ 839% same
- hongyuanc/codex-game-studios★ 510% same
- dawn840705/claude-code-studios★ 139% same
- HunLuanZhiZhu/Game-Studios-Plugin★ 133% same
- venus2099/codex-game-studios★ 111% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- cenconq25/claude-code-app-studio★ 40same name
- CodePhobiia/claude-roblox-game-studio★ 9same name
- gonimar/claude-web-studio★ 4same name
- Shehabov/ai-dev-crew★ 4same name
- ShiningPlague/shiningplague-studio★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +10 more from lilangMax
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architecture-decisionSkill
- asset-auditSkill
- balance-checkSkill
- brainstormSkill
- bug-reportSkill
- changelogSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-systemSkill
- estimateSkill
- gate-checkSkill
- hotfixSkill
- launch-checklistSkill
- localizeSkill
- map-systemsSkill
- milestone-reviewSkill
- onboardSkill
- patch-notesSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playtest-reportSkill
- project-stage-detectSkill
- prototypeSkill
- release-checklistSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reverse-documentSkill
- scope-checkSkill
- setup-engineSkill
- sprint-planSkill
- startSkill
- team-audioSkill
- team-combatSkill
- team-levelSkill
- team-narrativeSkill
- team-polishSkill
- team-uiSkill
- tech-debtSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

