agentleFS
ControllableModelControllableModel/SWE-Skills-Bench/skills/clap-cli-patterns/SKILL.md

clap-cli-patterns

Skill8 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build production Rust CLIs with Clap: subcommands, config layering, validation, exit codes, shell completions, and testable command surfaces

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test the binary surface (arguments, output, exit codes) without coupling to internals.

    line 164

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Clap (Rust) - Production CLI Patterns

Overview

Clap provides declarative command-line parsing with strong help output, validation, and subcommand support. Use it to build CLIs with predictable UX and testable execution paths.

Quick Start

Minimal CLI

✅ Correct: derive Parser

use clap::Parser;

#[derive(Parser, Debug)]
#[command(name = "mytool", version, about = "Example CLI")]
struct Args {
    /// Enable verbose output
    #[arg(long)]
    verbose: bool,

    /// Input file path
    #[arg(value_name = "FILE")]
    input: String,
}

fn main() {
    let args = Args::parse();
    if args.verbose {
        eprintln!("verbose enabled");
    }
    println!("input={}", args.input);
}

❌ Wrong: parse multiple times

fn main() {
    let _a = Args::parse();
    let _b = Args::parse(); // duplicate parsing and inconsistent behavior
}

Subcommands (real tools)

Model multi-mode CLIs with subcommands and shared global flags.

✅ Correct: global flags + subcommands

use clap::{Parser, Subcommand, ValueEnum};

#[derive(Parser, Debug)]
struct Args {
    #[arg(long, global = true)]
    verbose: bool,

    #[arg(long, global = true, env = "MYTOOL_CONFIG")]
    config: Option<String>,

    #[command(subcommand)]
    cmd: Command,
}

#[derive(Subcommand, Debug)]
enum Command {
    Serve { #[arg(long, default_value_t = 3000)] port: u16 },
    Migrate { #[arg(long, value_enum, default_value_t = Mode::Up)] mode: Mode },
}

#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, ValueEnum)]
enum Mode { Up, Down }

fn main() {
    let args = Args::parse();
    match args.cmd {
        Command::Serve { port } => println!("serve on {}", port),
        Command::Migrate { mode } => println!("migrate: {:?}", mode),
    }
}

Config layering (CLI + env + config file)

Prefer explicit precedence:

  1. CLI flags
  2. Environment variables
  3. Config file
  4. Defaults

✅ Correct: merge config with CLI overrides

use clap::Parser;
use serde::Deserialize;

#[derive(Parser, Debug)]
struct Args {
    #[arg(long, env = "APP_PORT")]
    port: Option<u16>,
}

#[derive(Deserialize)]
struct FileConfig {
    port: Option<u16>,
}

fn effective_port(args: &Args, file: &FileConfig) -> u16 {
    args.port.or(file.port).unwrap_or(3000)
}

Exit codes and error handling

Map failures to stable exit codes. Return Result from command handlers and centralize printing.

✅ Correct: command returns Result

use std::process::ExitCode;

fn main() -> ExitCode {
    match run() {
        Ok(()) => ExitCode::SUCCESS,
        Err(e) => {
            eprintln!("{e}");
            ExitCode::from(1)
        }
    }
}

fn run() -> Result<(), String> {
    Ok(())
}

Testing (assert_cmd)

Test the binary surface (arguments, output, exit codes) without coupling to internals.

✅ Correct: integration test

use assert_cmd::Command;

#[test]
fn shows_help() {
    Command::cargo_bin("mytool")
        .unwrap()
        .arg("--help")
        .assert()
        .success();
}

Shell completions (optional)

Generate completions for Bash/Zsh/Fish.

✅ Correct: emit completions

use clap::{CommandFactory, Parser};
use clap_complete::{generate, shells::Zsh};
use std::io;

fn print_zsh_completions() {
    let mut cmd = super::Args::command();
    generate(Zsh, &mut cmd, "mytool", &mut io::stdout());
}

Anti-Patterns

  • Parse arguments in library code; parse once in main and pass a typed config down.
  • Hide failures behind unwrap; return stable exit codes and structured errors.
  • Overload one command with flags; use subcommands for distinct modes.

Resources

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.