agentleFS
Codagent-AICodagent-AI/agent-skills/skills/wait-ci/SKILL.md

wait-ci

Skill31 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Polls CI check status for the current branch's pull request and reports pass/fail/pending/comments, surfacing PR review comments even when CI is green. Use when the user says "wait for CI", "check CI", "poll CI", or invokes "codagent:wait-ci".

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the bundled scripts for all API calls — they encode the correct field names, jq patterns, and GraphQL queries.

    line 13
  2. Very specific:

    Use timeout: 120000 on the Bash call.

    line 39
  3. Very specific:

    After each exit-2 result, set ever_had_checks = ever_had_checks OR result.had_checks.

    line 47
  4. Distinctive:

    Timeout handling: When all runs are exhausted (exit code 2 on the last run):

    line 49
  5. Very specific:

    If ever_had_checks is false → treat CI as non-blocking, then still run Step 3 before reporting a final status

    line 50
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep the last 100 lines if output is longer.

    line 83
  7. Distinctive:

    Run this step after checks are terminal, checks time out as pending, or no checks exist:

    line 87
  8. Very specific:

    When checks are terminal, time out as pending, or do not exist, inspect informational_bot_comments.

    line 107
  9. Very specific:

    Status upgrade: If checks returned passed, timed out as pending, or were absent, but get-pr-comments.sh returns has_comments: true, report …

    line 124
  10. Very specific:

    No-checks handling: If polling timed out with no checks ever observed, run get-pr-comments.sh before reporting success.

    line 129
  11. Very specific:

    Default: 10 runs × 90 seconds = ~15 minutes max wait.

    line 182

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

codagent:wait-ci

Poll CI check status for the current branch's PR and report the result, enriching failures with log output and checking for blocking reviews.

Use the bundled scripts for all API calls — they encode the correct field names, jq patterns, and GraphQL queries. Do not rewrite API calls inline.

NEVER pause to ask the user for permission to wait. Always run the full polling duration silently. Asking mid-execution breaks automation and is never needed — the caller already decided to invoke this skill.

How polling works

check-ci.sh is a single-invocation script. It polls every 10 seconds for up to 90 seconds, then exits. Claude calls it in a loop to cover the full max wait time. This keeps each Bash call bounded to ~2 minutes rather than blocking the agent for the full duration.

Each Bash call to check-ci.sh must use timeout: 120000 (2 minutes).

Steps

1. Run the polling loop

Compute max_runs = ceil(max_minutes * 60 / 90), defaulting to max_minutes = 15 → 10 runs.

The skill accepts an optional --max-minutes N argument; pass it through to adjust max_runs.

Track ever_had_checks = false, run = 0, and the overall deadline across iterations. The deadline is max_minutes after polling starts and also bounds any review-bot waiting in Step 3.

For each run:

bash skills/wait-ci/scripts/check-ci.sh

Use timeout: 120000 on the Bash call. Check the exit code:

Exit codeMeaningAction
0Terminal (passed or failed)Break out of loop, proceed to Step 2
2Not yet terminal (pending or no_checks)If run < max_runs, re-run; else preserve the result and proceed to Step 3
1Fatal errorReport error and stop

After each exit-2 result, set ever_had_checks = ever_had_checks OR result.had_checks.

Timeout handling: When all runs are exhausted (exit code 2 on the last run):

  • If ever_had_checks is false → treat CI as non-blocking, then still run Step 3 before reporting a final status
  • Otherwise → preserve pending and the list of still-running checks, then run Step 3 before classifying the final status

The script outputs a JSON object with these fields:

FieldTypeDescription
statusstringpassed, failed, pending, no_checks, or comments (set by caller; may coexist with pending-check evidence)
pr_urlstringPR URL
pr_numbernumberPR number
head_shastringPR head commit queried for this invocation; preserve it when upgrading the status to comments
owner / repostringRepo coordinates for subsequent calls
had_checksboolWhether any checks were seen on this invocation
failed_checksarrayChecks with bucket == "fail"
passed_checksarrayChecks with bucket == "pass"
pending_checksarrayChecks still running
blocking_reviewsarrayReviews with CHANGES_REQUESTED (latest per reviewer)
failed_run_idsarrayGitHub Actions run IDs extracted from failed check links
mergeablestringGraphQL mergeable: MERGEABLE, CONFLICTING, or UNKNOWN
mergeStateStatusstringGraphQL merge state (DIRTY when conflicting)
conflicting_filesarrayPaths that conflict with the PR base when git merge-tree can see both commits

CONFLICTING is terminal failed even when checks are green. Keep polling while mergeable is UNKNOWN; do not emit passed. Include conflicting_files in the JSON when the PR base is available locally.

2. Fetch failure logs (if status == "failed")

For each run ID in failed_run_ids:

gh run view <run-id> --log-failed

Keep the last 100 lines if output is longer. External checks (no run ID) get no logs.

3. Gather PR comments

Run this step after checks are terminal, checks time out as pending, or no checks exist:

bash skills/wait-ci/scripts/get-pr-comments.sh <owner> <repo> <pr-number> [<pr-author-login>]

Uses GraphQL to check isResolved on review threads directly — no jq != workarounds needed.

Output fields:

FieldTypeDescription
has_commentsboolTrue if any actionable comments exist
unresolved_threadsarray{file, line, author, body} per actionable unresolved review thread
deferred_threadsarray{file, line, author, body} per unresolved thread deferred by the PR author or fix-pr session
issue_commentsarray{author, body} blocking top-level human comments (excluding PR creator)
informational_bot_commentsarray{author, body} non-blocking top-level bot comments retained as evidence

has_comments is true only for actionable unresolved threads plus blocking issue comments. A thread is deferred (non-actionable) when fix-pr replied without resolving: the latest significant comment after stripping trailing reviewer-bot acks is from the PR author or from a different bot than the original finding bot (factory session identity). Later bot acknowledgments do not re-block; a later human reviewer reply is actionable again. Green CI with only deferred threads is passed. Keep deferred threads visible under their own heading. Do not add a fourth CI status marker.

When checks are terminal, time out as pending, or do not exist, inspect informational_bot_comments. If a bot explicitly reports that its review is pending or in progress, or asks the caller to check back, wait 10 seconds and call get-pr-comments.sh again while time remains before the overall deadline. Re-evaluate the latest evidence on every poll. Do not hard-code bot vendors or exact phrases; use the comment's meaning. A terminal current-head check from that bot supersedes an older progress notice. Completed summaries and ordinary status notices remain informational and do not delay completion.

At the overall deadline, use this precedence:

  1. failed for failed checks, CONFLICTING merge state, or blocking reviews.
  2. comments when actionable unresolved feedback exists, even if a review bot is still unfinished.
  3. pending when checks or a review bot remain unfinished and no actionable feedback exists.
  4. passed when CI is green or explicitly absent, no actionable feedback exists, and no review bot remains unfinished.

Preserve unfinished bot notices in the report even when actionable feedback makes the status comments. Never extend the overall deadline while waiting for review bots.

Status upgrade: If checks returned passed, timed out as pending, or were absent, but get-pr-comments.sh returns has_comments: true, report the final status as comments unless failed checks or blocking reviews require failed. Preserve the check result, including pending_checks, when upgrading the status.

No-checks handling: If polling timed out with no checks ever observed, run get-pr-comments.sh before reporting success. Report comments when has_comments is true, pending when a review bot remains explicitly unfinished at the deadline or mergeable is UNKNOWN, and otherwise passed.

Output Format

## CI Status: <passed | failed | pending | comments>

**PR:** <url>
**Elapsed:** ~<N> minutes

### Failed Checks
- **<check-name>** (FAILURE)
  Link: <details-url>
  Logs:
<log output> ```

Merge Conflicts

  • <conflicting-path>

Blocking Reviews

  • <reviewer>: <review body>

PR Comments

  • <author> on <file> line <N>: <comment body>
  • <author> (issue comment): <comment body>

Deferred Threads

  • <author> on <file> line <N>: <comment body>

Informational Bot Comments

  • <author>: <comment body>

Passing Checks

  • <check-name> (SUCCESS)

Still Running

  • <check-name> (PENDING/IN_PROGRESS)

Status meanings:
- `passed` — CI green, mergeable, no blocking reviews or actionable comments, and no bot review still in progress. Deferred threads may still be listed.
- `failed` — CI failures, `CONFLICTING` merge state, or `CHANGES_REQUESTED` reviews (with logs and conflicting paths when available)
- `comments` — actionable PR comments need addressing; known actionable feedback takes precedence
  over unfinished checks or review automation, whose pending evidence remains in the report
- `pending` — checks, unknown mergeability, or an explicitly unfinished bot review remain after max wait, with no actionable feedback available

## Notes

- Can be invoked standalone without prior workflow state
- Default: 10 runs × 90 seconds = ~15 minutes max wait; pass `--max-minutes N` to override
- **Never ask the user for permission mid-execution** — always run the full duration
- `CHANGES_REQUESTED` is a hard block; `APPROVED` and `COMMENTED` alone do not block
- `CONFLICTING` is a hard block; `UNKNOWN` mergeability is not `passed`
- Comment gathering runs after polling ends, including pending-check timeouts and the no-checks path
- Log enrichment only works for GitHub Actions checks (not external status checks)

## Scripts Reference

| Script | Purpose |
|---|---|
| `scripts/check-ci.sh` | Single-invocation poller (90s, 10s interval) — call in a loop from the skill |
| `scripts/get-pr-comments.sh` | GraphQL comment fetcher — returns actionable review feedback, deferred threads, and informational bot comments |

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.