handoff
Skill31 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Summarizes a specific aspect of the current conversation so another agent can resume. Use when the user says "handoff", "summarize for handoff", "write a handoff", or wants to capture context for another agent session. The user MUST specify what aspect to summarize in their prompt (e.g., "handoff the debugging progress", "handoff the design decisions").
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Write a focused summary of a specific aspect of the current conversation so a fresh agent can pick up where this session left off.
- Very specific: line 31
Write the summary to handoff.md.
- Distinctive: line 35
If the user specified a path in their prompt, use it.
- Distinctive: line 36
If a project configuration (e.g., AGENTS.md, openspec config, or similar conventions) specifies a change directory, write there.
- Distinctive: line 39
Do not ask the user to confirm the location.
- Distinctive: line 76
Do not invent context: Only capture what actually happened or was discussed in this session.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Handoff
Write a focused summary of a specific aspect of the current conversation so a fresh agent can pick up where this session left off.
This is NOT a full conversation summary. The user's prompt tells you which aspect to capture. If the aspect is unclear, ask for clarification before proceeding.
What to capture
For the aspect the user specified, write:
- Objective — What the user is trying to accomplish (the goal, not the history).
- Current state — Where things stand right now. What's done, what's in progress, what's blocked.
- Key decisions — Decisions made during this session that the next agent must honor, with brief rationale.
- Open questions — Unresolved issues, trade-offs still being weighed, or things the user hasn't decided yet.
- Next steps — Concrete actions the resuming agent should take first.
- Relevant files — Paths to files that were created, modified, or are central to the work.
Omit any section that has nothing meaningful to say. Keep it tight — the resuming agent needs signal, not narration.
Output
Write the summary to handoff.md.
Determining the output location:
- If the user specified a path in their prompt, use it.
- If a project configuration (e.g., AGENTS.md, openspec config, or similar conventions) specifies a change directory, write there.
- Otherwise, determine the relevant change slug from context (the change being worked on, or a kebab-case slug from the topic) and write to
~/.agent-skills/changes/<slug>/handoff.md.
Do not ask the user to confirm the location. Just write to the resolved path.
Template
# Handoff: <aspect being handed off>
## Objective
<!-- What the user is trying to accomplish -->
## Current State
<!-- Where things stand: done, in progress, blocked -->
## Key Decisions
<!-- Decisions made this session that the next agent must honor -->
- **<decision>** — <rationale>
## Open Questions
<!-- Unresolved issues or trade-offs -->
## Next Steps
<!-- Concrete first actions for the resuming agent -->
## Relevant Files
<!-- Paths to files central to this work -->Guardrails
- Write from current context only. The handoff should be based on what the agent already knows from the current conversation — do not explore files, run searches, or do additional research unless the user explicitly asks for it.
- Do not summarize the entire conversation. Focus only on the aspect the user specified.
- Do not invent context. Only capture what actually happened or was discussed in this session.
- Do not prescribe solutions for open questions. State the question; let the next agent and user decide.
- Write for a cold reader. The resuming agent has zero prior context — be precise about file paths, branch names, and terminology.
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- ykdojo/claude-code-tips★ 10ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- davidondrej/skills★ 4.2ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use decision-mapping, setup-ts-deep-modules and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 37 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 84 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 80 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 46 projects that use this
AWSSkillwait-what
Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.
Also in 102 projects that use this
- +1 more from aws
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- releaseSkill
- releaseSkill
- ask-questionsSkill
- call-agentSkill
- designSkill
- finalize-prSkill
- fix-prSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- initSkill
- orchestrate-changeSkill
- plan-tasksSkill
- prepare-acceptanceSkill
- proposal-reviewSkill
- proposeSkill
- push-prSkill
- review-approachSkill
- review-assumptionsSkill
- review-specSkill
- review-tasksSkill
- session-reportSkill
- simple-planSkill
- specSkill
- task-complianceSkill
- test-flowsSkill
- test-planSkill
- verify-behaviorSkill
- wait-ciSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

