agentleFS
ChristopherAlphonseChristopherAlphonse/calphonse-skills/simplify/SKILL.md

simplify

Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Restate the last message in plain human language, with no jargon. Use when the user says they don't follow, or asks to "simplify", "ELI5", "say that plainly", "in plain English", or "what does that mean".

119 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use codex-system, design-tracker and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • gaebalaiSkill

    codex-system

    PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • gaebalaiSkill

    design-tracker

    PROACTIVELY track and document project design decisions without being asked. Activate automatically when detecting architecture discussions, implementation decisions, pattern choices, library selections, or any technical decisions. Also use when user explicitly says "記録して", "設計どうなってる", "record this". Do NOT wait for user to ask - record important decisions immediately.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mike22890Skill

    clonedeps

    将项目依赖的第三方库源码克隆到本地,便于深入阅读和调试。当需要查看库的实现细节、阅读源码、调试第三方依赖、理解 SDK/framework 内部机制、查看 node_modules 之外的原始代码、分析开源库架构、学习他人代码、查看依赖的 TypeScript 类型定义时使用。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • mdrubelamin2Skill

    verification-planning

    Plans how to prove a change works or broke nothing: frames the claim, designs an evidence path from the system itself, and requires every check to be able to fail.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • devbrother2024Skill

    artifact-design

    단독 self-contained HTML 산출물(랜딩 페이지, 정적 문서·리포트, 독립 대시보드, 데모·게임, 개발 전 UX/UI 대안 비교 목업)을 만들 때 팔레트·타이포그래피·레이아웃을 의도적으로 설계하고 템플릿·AI스러운 디자인을 피하도록 돕는 디자인 가이드. HTML/CSS를 쓰기 전에 로드한다. "랜딩 만들어줘", "이 내용 단일 HTML로 예쁘게", "UX 대안 HTML로 비교해줘", "디자인 잡아줘"처럼 단독 HTML 아티팩트를 만들거나 비교하는 요청에 활성화하고, 기존 앱(React·Vue 등)의 인앱 컴포넌트 수정이나 순수 백엔드·로직 작업에는 쓰지 않는다.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • codebycoreySkill

    batch

    Create multiple proposals from free-form feature descriptions. Use when planning several features at once, batch creating proposals, or setting up related changes.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +3 more from gaebalai

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 111 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep caveats that change what the reader should do.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    No analogies unless the idea can't be said plainly.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Don't add new information or re-argue the original.

    line 15

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 111 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Restate your last message for someone who doesn't know this codebase or its vocabulary.

Rules:

  • Lead with the outcome or answer, then the one reason that matters.
  • Replace identifiers, flags, class names, and acronyms with what they do. Keep a name only if the reader must act on it (a command to run, a file to open).
  • Keep caveats that change what the reader should do.
  • Aim for 1-3 sentences unless the original had several distinct points or decisions.
  • No analogies unless the idea can't be said plainly.
  • Don't add new information or re-argue the original.

Example 1 (explaining behavior)

Before:

Without --traceparent, TraceParent is null, so StartFromTraceParent returns null and no span is started. Worker skips the "continuing trace" log line and the run goes ahead normally, just untraced. An empty value, the literal "null" that EventBridge sends when the field is missing, and a malformed value all behave the same way. This is covered by AppArgumentsFactoryTests and TraceContinuationTests. I also ran it locally without the flag, and it goes straight from Worker: starting with args… to the job. Locally there's no collector, so the compose files set OTEL_SDK_DISABLED=true.

After:

Nothing breaks, it just runs untraced, because without the flag no trace gets started and the job carries on as normal.

Example 2 (diagnosis and recommendation)

Before:

The 502s are from the ALB health check failing: the target group probes /health on 8080, but the container binds 127.0.0.1 only, so the probe gets a connection reset and the task is deregistered every ~90s. Bind to 0.0.0.0 (HOST env var) and the checks pass. Verified in staging; prod needs a task definition revision and a rolling deploy.

After:

The app is only listening to itself, so the load balancer can't reach it and keeps marking it unhealthy. Change its host setting to listen on all addresses and redeploy; I confirmed this fixes it in staging.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.