agentleFS
CadastoCadasto/openehr-assistant-plugin/skills/archetype-lint/SKILL.md

archetype-lint

Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when the user asks to "lint an archetype", "validate an archetype", "check archetype compliance", "check archetype rules compliance", or "run archetype rules". Applies 24 normative lint rules with ERROR/WARNING/INFO severity. Supports STRICT and PERMISSIVE modes. Reports violations only — it does not modify files; to lint *and* remediate, use the `archetype-authoring` skill. Auto-invoked on lint/validate intent, and also directly invocable as `/archetype-lint <file or id> [strict]`.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user does not specify a mode, use PERMISSIVE.

    line 39

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Archetype Lint

An openEHR archetype linting engine. Evaluate archetypes against 24 normative rules. Classify each violation as ERROR, WARNING, or INFO. ERROR means the archetype is invalid or unsafe.

Step 1: Load Guides (MANDATORY)

guide_get("openehr://guides/archetypes/rules")
guide_get("openehr://guides/archetypes/structural-constraints")
guide_get("openehr://guides/archetypes/anti-patterns")
guide_get("openehr://guides/archetypes/terminology")

Step 2: Determine Mode

  • STRICT: Zero WARNING tolerance. For publication candidates and CKM submissions.
  • PERMISSIVE (default): WARNINGs allowed with justification. For early modeling iterations.

If the user does not specify a mode, use PERMISSIVE.

Step 3: Apply Lint Rules

The normative rule definitions live in the archetypes/rules guide loaded in Step 1 — that guide is the single source of truth. If this index ever disagrees with the loaded guide, the guide wins. Use the index below for rule numbering and severity; consult the guide for each rule's full definition, rationale, and worked examples before classifying a violation.

#RuleSeverityGroup
1Single ConceptERRORCore semantic
2ENTRY Type SemanticsERRORCore semantic
3Root RM Type MatchERRORCore semantic
4Valid RM Attributes OnlyERRORCore semantic
5occurrences vs cardinalityERRORCore semantic
6Specialisation IntegrityERRORCore semantic
7Path StabilityERRORCore semantic
8Term Definition CompletenessERRORCore semantic
9Mandatory Data JustificationWARNINGStructural
10Arbitrary Upper BoundsWARNINGStructural
11CLUSTER SemanticsWARNINGStructural
12Slot DisciplineWARNINGStructural
13Template LeakageWARNINGStructural
14Unconstrained Leaf NodesWARNINGADL & AOM syntax
15Attribute Multiplicity ComplianceERRORADL & AOM syntax
16Ontology IntegrityERRORADL & AOM syntax
17Terminology NeutralityWARNINGTerminology
18Semantic Binding AccuracyWARNINGTerminology
19Archetypable DemographicsINFODemographic
20Identity vs Role SeparationERRORDemographic
21Patch Version DisciplineERRORVersioning
22Deprecation HandlingWARNINGVersioning
23Prose ↔ Slot ConsistencyWARNINGDocumentation (guide rule D9)
24Translation AccuracyWARNINGDocumentation (guide rule E7)

For rule 4, verify attribute names against the RM with type_specification_get when uncertain.

Offline fallback only: skills/openehr-assistant/reference/lint-rules-complete.md mirrors these definitions as the clinical-modeler agent's fallback when its read-only MCP lookups are blocked. In the main session, always prefer the loaded archetypes/rules guide.

Avoid known false positives

  • ITEM_TREE.items {0..*} is idiomatic — the established CKM convention for container attributes (e.g. the published ecg_result.v1). Do not flag it under rule 9 / structural-constraints when at least one contained ELEMENT is mandatory; reserve a finding for genuinely empty or all-optional containers. Flagging idiomatic items {0..*} is noise.
  • Unstated occurrences/existence are not violations — ADL 1.4 defaults both to {1..1} when unstated. For rule 5, also check mutual consistency: the sum of sibling occurrences ranges must fit inside the container's cardinality interval (validator-tooling check VCOC).
  • Validity codes are tooling constructs — mnemonics like VARID/VCOC/VUNT come from AOM2 and validator tooling (ADL Workbench, archie, CKM), not from ADL 1.4 spec text. Cite them as tool-output aids, never as "ADL 1.4 validity rules".
  • Partial terminology coverage is valid — a term_bindings section need not bind every internal at-code (ADL 1.4, Term_bindings). Do not report unbound codes as a rule 17/18 violation; bindings are optional-but-recommended, so incomplete coverage is at most an INFO observation.

Step 4: Generate Report

Required Output Format

## Lint Report

**Archetype:** <archetype-id>
**Mode:** STRICT | PERMISSIVE
**Overall Status:** PASS | FAIL

### Violations

| # | Severity | Rule | Explanation | Suggested Fix |
|---|----------|------|-------------|---------------|
| 1 | ERROR    | R4   | Attribute `blood_pressure` is not a valid RM attribute on ITEM_TREE | Use `items` (valid RM path) |

### Summary
- ERRORs: N
- WARNINGs: N
- INFOs: N

Gating logic:

  • Any ERROR -> overall status = FAIL
  • STRICT mode: any WARNING -> overall status = FAIL
  • PERMISSIVE mode: WARNINGs allowed if justified

Step 5: After the Report (routing only)

This skill reports; the report's Suggested Fix column is the ceiling of what it provides. When the user asks for a fix plan or for fixes to be applied, route to the archetype-authoring skill — its fix-syntax mode for parse/structure errors, its review-remediate pipeline (minimal-diff plan, path/semantics impact, version-bump justification) for semantic findings.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.