land-and-deploy
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Merge, deploy, and verify production skill. Use when a PR is approved and ready to land — this skill merges the PR, monitors CI/CD pipeline completion, waits for the deploy to finish, verifies production health, and confirms the feature is live and working. The final step from "approved" to "verified in production".
- Commits and pushes
33 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- timurgaleev/vibestacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- trungtm78/ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ignavm1/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- leishifu666/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- chriswestt/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- IyedBecheikh/bstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use landing-report, pair-agent and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 7 projects that use this
seek888Skillpair-agent
Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".
Also in 9 projects that use this
timurgaleevSkilldocument-generate
Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 7 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 6 projects that use this
Saqlain-811Skillios-clean
Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +3 more from ShreyRavi
Other versions33 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 33
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7ksame name
- DenchHQ/ironclaw★ 1.7ksame name
- mr-daedalium/ostack-saas★ 108same name
- no-session/pstack★ 96same name
- lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko★ 45same name
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- Samin12/skills★ 8same name
- timurgaleev/vibestack★ 8same name
- blas1n/claude-skills★ 2same name
23 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository48 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-memorySkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- api-designSkill
- autoplanSkill
- backend-devSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- commit-messageSkill
- database-architectSkill
- data-engineerSkill
- debuggerSkill
- design-explorerSkill
- devex-engineerSkill
- devops-platformSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- forward-deployment-engineerSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- java-developmentSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- pdfSkill
- performance-optimizerSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- plan-eng-reviewSkill
- pptxSkill
- product-engineerSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- python-developmentSkill
- qa-engineerSkill
- react-developmentSkill
- release-engineerSkill
- research-agentSkill
- retro-engineerSkill
- safety-guardrailsSkill
- security-engineerSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- spec-authorSkill
- sre-canarySkill
- system-designSkill
- technical-writerSkill
- test-writerSkill
- theme-factorySkill
- typescript-developmentSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
- xlsxSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 26 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
One PR per deploy: Never stack deploys. Land one, verify it, then land the next.
- Distinctive: line 26
Before touching the merge button:
- Distinctive: line 86
If CI fails: Do not proceed to deploy. Fix the failure on a hotfix branch or revert the merge.
- Very specific: line 145
All instances/pods/dynos running the new version
- Distinctive: line 153
Run these checks immediately after deploy completes.
- Distinctive: line 165
Check your monitoring dashboard (Datadog, Grafana, New Relic) for:
- Distinctive: line 200
If guarded by a feature flag: Do NOT flip the flag yet. Verify the deploy is healthy first.
- Distinctive: line 203
If a performance change: Check the benchmark metric that was being improved.
- Distinctive: line 253
After a successful deploy:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 26 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Land and Deploy
You are the release engineer who takes an approved PR from "approved" to "verified in production." This is the final mile. Everything before this was preparation. This is the moment where preparation meets reality — and reality has a way of finding surprises.
Go slow here. Every step has a verification. Never assume a step succeeded without checking.
Land and Deploy Principles
- Approved is not shipped. CI can pass and the deploy can still fail. The feature can deploy and still not reach users. Verify at every stage.
- One PR per deploy. Never stack deploys. Land one, verify it, then land the next.
- The rollback plan is not optional. Know how to undo this deploy before you start it.
- Speed kills here. The pressure to ship fast causes skipped verification steps. Skipped steps cause incidents. Take the five extra minutes.
- Silence after deploy is not success. Actively verify — do not assume it worked because nothing broke loudly.
Step 0: Pre-Land Checklist
Before touching the merge button:
- PR has explicit approval from a qualified reviewer
- All CI checks are green — not just the required ones
- No merge conflicts (re-check — new commits to main since approval can create conflicts)
- Deploy environment is ready (no ongoing incident, no freeze window, no other deploy in progress)
- Rollback plan confirmed: know the exact command to revert this deploy
- Feature flag confirmed (if applicable): deploy can happen before the flag is flipped
- On-call / relevant team notified if this is a high-risk change
- Database migrations reviewed: are they zero-downtime?
Step 1: Merge
Choosing the merge strategy
| Strategy | When to use | Effect on history |
| Squash merge | Feature branches with messy interim commits | One clean commit on main per PR |
| Merge commit | Long-lived branches, audit trail needed | Preserves full branch history |
| Rebase merge | Linear history required, clean commits on branch | Linear history, replays commits |
Default recommendation: Squash merge for feature branches. Merge commit for release branches.
Merge steps
# Via GitHub CLI (recommended — atomically merges and triggers CI)
gh pr merge <PR-NUMBER> --squash --delete-branch
# Verify merge landed on main
git fetch origin
git log origin/main --oneline -5Confirm: the merged commit SHA appears at the top of main.
Step 2: Monitor CI Pipeline
The merge triggers CI. Watch it — do not walk away.
GitHub Actions
# Watch CI status in real time
gh run watch
# Or check status
gh run list --branch main --limit 5
gh run view <RUN-ID>What to watch for
- Build failures — dependency issues, compilation errors introduced by the merge
- Test failures — flaky tests that passed on the PR but fail on main
- Lint / type check failures — code that sneaked past branch checks
- Security scan failures — new vulnerabilities in merged dependencies
If CI fails: Do not proceed to deploy. Fix the failure on a hotfix branch or revert the merge. Never deploy from a failing main.
Step 3: Trigger & Monitor Deploy
Platform-specific deploy verification
Vercel
# Check deployment status
vercel ls --prod | head -5
# Or via dashboard: vercel.com/[team]/[project]/deployments
# Wait for status: ● ReadyRailway / Render
# Railway
railway status
# Check logs for startup errors
railway logs --tail 50Kubernetes (kubectl)
# Watch rollout
kubectl rollout status deployment/<name> -n production --timeout=5m
# Verify pods are running
kubectl get pods -n production -l app=<name>
# Check for restart loops
kubectl get pods -n production -l app=<name> | grep -v RunningAWS ECS
# Watch service stabilization
aws ecs wait services-stable \
--cluster production \
--services <service-name>
# Check task health
aws ecs describe-services \
--cluster production \
--services <service-name> \
--query 'services[0].{running:runningCount,desired:desiredCount,pending:pendingCount}'Heroku
heroku releases --app <app-name> | head -5
heroku ps --app <app-name>Deploy completion signals
- All instances/pods/dynos running the new version
- Zero pending or crashed instances
- Health check endpoint responding on all instances
Step 4: Production Health Verification
Run these checks immediately after deploy completes. Do not skip.
1. Health endpoint check
# Liveness
curl -sf https://your-app.com/health | jq .
# Expected: { "status": "ok", "version": "1.2.3" }
# Verify: version matches the deployed commit2. Error rate check
Check your monitoring dashboard (Datadog, Grafana, New Relic) for:
- Error rate spike in the 5 minutes post-deploy vs the 5 minutes pre-deploy
- P95 latency change
- Any new error types appearing in logs
# Quick server log check (if accessible)
# Look for ERROR, FATAL, Exception in the last 5 minutes3. Critical path smoke test
Manually verify the single most important user action works:
| App type | Smoke test |
| API | curl the most-used endpoint with valid auth |
| Web app | Open the app, log in, perform the core action |
| Background worker | Trigger a job, verify it completes without error |
| Data pipeline | Check that the latest run completed successfully |
4. Database migration verification (if applicable)
-- Verify migration ran
SELECT version, applied_at FROM schema_migrations ORDER BY applied_at DESC LIMIT 3;
-- Verify data integrity (spot check)
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM affected_table WHERE created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '10 minutes';Step 5: Feature Verification
Confirm the specific feature that was deployed is actually working:
- If guarded by a feature flag: Do NOT flip the flag yet. Verify the deploy is healthy first. Then flip the flag for internal users only. Monitor for 15 minutes. Then roll out to 100%.
- If live for all users: Perform the specific user action introduced or changed by this PR.
- If a bug fix: Reproduce the original bug scenario. Confirm it no longer occurs.
- If a performance change: Check the benchmark metric that was being improved.
Step 6: Rollback Decision Tree
Deploy complete?
├── NO → Wait, check platform logs for stuck deploy → escalate if >10min
└── YES
└── Health checks passing?
├── NO → ROLLBACK IMMEDIATELY (see below)
└── YES
└── Error rate normal?
├── SPIKE (>2x baseline) → ROLLBACK IMMEDIATELY
└── NORMAL
└── Smoke test passing?
├── FAIL → ROLLBACK IMMEDIATELY
└── PASS → ✅ DEPLOY VERIFIEDRollback commands
# Vercel
vercel rollback --prod
# Kubernetes
kubectl rollout undo deployment/<name> -n production
kubectl rollout status deployment/<name> -n production
# Heroku
heroku rollback --app <app-name>
# ECS (redeploy previous task definition)
aws ecs update-service \
--cluster production \
--service <service-name> \
--task-definition <name>:<previous-revision>
# Git revert (if rollback platform command unavailable)
git revert <merge-commit-sha> --no-edit
git push origin main
# Then redeployStep 7: Post-Deploy Documentation
After a successful deploy:
## Deploy Log — [Feature Name] — [Date]
**PR:** #[number] — [title]
**Merged by:** [name]
**Deployed at:** [timestamp]
**Deploy duration:** [minutes]
**Platform:** [Vercel / K8s / ECS / etc.]
**Verification:**
- [ ] Health endpoint: ✅ { "status": "ok", "version": "X.Y.Z" }
- [ ] Error rate: ✅ No spike (baseline: X%, post-deploy: X%)
- [ ] Smoke test: ✅ [describe what was tested]
- [ ] Feature verified: ✅ [describe what was confirmed working]
**Notes:** [anything unusual observed]
**Hand off to:** sre-canary for ongoing monitoringIntegration
| Upstream | Downstream |
release-engineer — creates and opens the PR | sre-canary — monitors production after this skill verifies the deploy |
code-reviewer — reviews the PR before merge | retro-engineer — retrospective includes deploy outcomes |
Definition of Done — Land and Deploy
- Pre-land checklist fully completed before merge
- Merge strategy chosen deliberately and executed
- CI pipeline monitored to completion — green
- Deploy monitored to completion on the target platform
- Health endpoint responding with correct version
- Error rate checked — no spike
- P95 latency checked — no regression
- Critical path smoke test passed manually
- Specific feature functionality verified in production
- Feature flag strategy executed (if applicable)
- Deploy log written with timestamps and verification evidence
- Hand-off to sre-canary for ongoing monitoring
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

