forge-review
Skill1 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Short alias for the Forgeflow multi-agent review workflow.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- brightstack/forgetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- antonailog/forge-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fabioalencar/forgedesigntheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- peterzat/OrgSmiththeir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- yike-gunshi/forge-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- KhaledAufDB/lakeforgetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use forge-ship and Forge.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
redteamlifeSkillforge-ship
Use when the user asks to merge, release, promote, reconcile, or close out work in a repo containing `docs/forge/` or governed by FORGE. Not for per-task commits; those complete inside forge-execute-task.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ikennaokpalaSkillForge
Autonomous quality engineering swarm that forges production-ready code through continuous behavioral verification, exhaustive E2E testing, and self-healing fix loops. Combines DDD+ADR+TDD methodology with BDD/Gherkin specifications, 7 quality gates, defect prediction, chaos testing, and cross-context dependency awareness. Architecture-agnostic - works with monoliths, microservices, modular monoliths, and any bounded-context topology.
Also in 8 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- antonailog/forge-skills★ 13same name
- brightstack/forge★ 13same name
- yike-gunshi/forge-skills★ 13same name
- peterzat/OrgSmith★ 6same name
- tonmoy007/forge-plugins★ 2same name
- fabioalencar/forgedesign★ 1same name
- khaledayeva/star-forge★ 1same name
- redteamlife/forge★ 1same name
- tinyorbit-ai/skills★ 1same name
- tusharpandey13/forge★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/forgeflow-lean.mdcCursor rule
- aegis-verifySkill
- agent-chat-offSkill
- agent-chat-onSkill
- auditSkill
- consultSkill
- create-agentSkill
- debateSkill
- discussSkill
- forgeflow-capabilitiesSkill
- forgeflow-consultSkill
- forgeflow-implementSkill
- forgeflow-research-divergence-adviceSkill
- forgeflow-research-divergence-evalSkill
- forgeflow-reviewSkill
- implementSkill
- planSkill
- quickSkill
- researchSkill
- shipSkill
- taskSkill
- update-forgeflowSkill
- verifier-verifySkill
- forgeflow-auditSkill
- forgeflow-capabilitiesSkill
- forgeflow-implementSkill
- forgeflow-lean-auditSkill
- forgeflow-lean-debtSkill
- forgeflow-lean-primeSkill
- forgeflow-lean-reviewSkill
- forgeflow-leanSkill
- forgeflow-planSkill
- forgeflow-research-divergence-adviceSkill
- forgeflow-reviewSkill
- forgeflow-shipSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
Use this skill when the user wants Forgeflow review of a diff, branch, or file set.
- Very specific: line 25
If both this alias and forgeflow-review are available, treat them as equivalent.
- Distinctive: line 29
After Architect or Product Lead issues an actual final decision, save that decision and its supporting evidence in a project-local report, …
- Distinctive: line 49
Never insert workflow agent identities or local evidence references into application source, comments, docstrings, tests, fixtures, …
- Distinctive: line 50
Before staging or publishing, inspect the actual staged diff, outgoing commits, and public text.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- forgeflow-capability-selection:start -->Automatic capability selection
Resolve select-capabilities.js from the checkout scripts/forgeflow, a host-supplied plugin root, or the installed ForgeFlow runtime for this host. Run node <helper-dir>/select-capabilities.js --guide and follow the shared selection procedure with phase review and the current objective, criteria and affected scope. Reuse the same result across alias handoffs and pass it through existing context construction; do not reset reassessment limits. Missing runtime support is an explicit limitation, not a reason to invent selection results. Preserve current workflow read-only and isolation boundaries. Planned capabilities are not executable and selection grants no new authority.
<!-- forgeflow-capability-selection:end -->At workflow entry, run node <helper-dir>/open-session-dashboard.js --root <project-root> --workflow forge-review when available. Resolve <helper-dir> from the checkout's scripts/forgeflow first, then ${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/forgeflow/scripts/forgeflow. The helper starts or reuses agent-chat and reports known workflow phases on each entry; it uses CODEX_THREAD_ID, CLAUDE_SESSION_ID, or FORGEFLOW_SESSION_ID to open the local dashboard once per session. If the host supplies a session id separately, pass --session <host-session-id>; never invent a new id per invocation. Headless runs and FORGEFLOW_DASHBOARD_AUTO_OPEN=off skip the launch. A missing helper or unavailable browser must not block the workflow. Report actual phase transitions, significant progress, waiting, and the final result with node <runtime-root>/services/agent-chat/client.js activity <state> "<short label>" (<runtime-root> is the checkout or installed forgeflow directory). Use complete only when work and required checks have finished; report failed for failures, and never invent progress to keep Ember moving.
Delegate to the forgeflow-review workflow.
Use this skill when the user wants Forgeflow review of a diff, branch, or file set.
Workflow:
- Determine the review scope.
- Spawn the specialist reviewers in parallel.
- Synthesize with
architect_reviewer. - Final-check with
product_lead_reviewer.
If both this alias and forgeflow-review are available, treat them as equivalent.
Record explicit review outcomes
After Architect or Product Lead issues an actual final decision, save that decision and its supporting evidence in a project-local report, then record it once with the shared telemetry helper:
node <runtime-root>/hooks/forgeflow-telemetry.js record-verdict --cwd <project-root> --reviewer <architect-or-product_lead> --verdict "<exact-decision>" --evidence <saved-report-relative-path> --event-id <stable-outcome-id> --command /<workflow-name> --session <host-session-id>Resolve <runtime-root> from the checkout first, then ${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/forgeflow. Architect decisions are APPROVE, CONDITIONAL APPROVE, REVISE, or BLOCK; Product Lead decisions are CONFIRM or CHALLENGE. Record only an explicitly issued decision, never infer approval from passing tests, silence, or an implementation summary. If a final decision is absent, ask the reviewer to state it or leave the outcome unrecorded. Reuse the same event id on retries; use a distinct id for each reviewer and review round, such as <host-session-id>.review-2.architect. The helper rejects conflicting reuse and prevents duplicate counts. Session can be omitted when CODEX_THREAD_ID or FORGEFLOW_SESSION_ID is present. A recording failure must be reported without changing the review result or fabricating history.
Task evidence continuity
Use the shared task workflow for a bounded change with an accepted objective or brief. Resolve task.js from the same runtime helper directory used above. Run list --root <project-root> and reuse only the task explicitly selected by the user or matching the current objective and scope. Do not attach an unrelated task based only on recency. If this is a new accepted change, create a task using its objective and behavioral acceptance criteria; the task workflow describes the JSON contract.
Keep the same task id across consult, implement, review and ship. Use check for actual validation commands and saved evidence for observed manual/reviewer results. Record a checkpoint at each completed phase and before interruption, including the actual host/session identity when available. A saved plan, successful build, or reviewer verdict alone must not mark every criterion verified. Waivers require explicit user intent and a reason.
Before reporting completion or preparing a shipping handoff, read status --root <project-root> --task <id>. Stale/missing/failed criteria and pending actions remain visible. Reconcile interrupted actions from actual evidence, then use resume; never silently replay unknown work. Legacy work without task records stays supported but has no source-bound task completion claim. All remote authorization rules above still apply.
Local-only workflow boundary
- Treat every
.forgeflow/directory, its contents, and workflow agent identities as local working context only. Never stage, commit, push, attach, upload, or sync this state, including through memory-sync commands. Use Git's localinfo/excludefor generated state; never force-add it. Ignore rules do not protect already tracked files. - Never include local artifact paths, agent names, persona names, role labels, agent verdict attribution, or workflow signatures in PR titles, bodies, comments, commit messages, release notes, or published artifacts. Describe the change and observed validation in ordinary engineering language. Keep detailed review attribution and evidence links in local reports.
- Never insert workflow agent identities or local evidence references into application source, comments, docstrings, tests, fixtures, identifiers, UI text, or shipped documentation. Use domain-based names and explain technical reasons without agent attribution.
- Before staging or publishing, inspect the actual staged diff, outgoing commits, and public text. A local-state file or workflow attribution leak blocks the action until corrected. Do not silently delete local evidence or rewrite existing history; report already tracked or committed state for cleanup.
- These rules govern project work produced with Forgeflow. Forgeflow's own maintained agent definitions, integration code, and documentation may name the agents and state paths needed to implement the tool; generated session state is always local. Ordinary domain terms that happen to match a role name are not workflow attribution.
- Local CLI labels, orchestration messages, and local report schemas may retain identities. This boundary takes precedence over instructions to copy local reports into public output or sync session memory.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

